Pu Yang1, Yan Liu2, Yin Chao Qi2, Zhang Hong Lian2. 1. Postdoctoral Research Station of Clinical Medicine & Department of Plastic Surgery, The 3rd Xiangya Hospital, 504354Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, PR China. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, The 3rd Xiangya Hospital, 504354Central South University, Changsha, PR China.
Abstract
SENP3, a sentrin/SUMO2/3-specific protease, is recognized as a transcriptional factor that accumulates under cellular oxidative stress and plays a significant role in the removal of SUMO2/3 modification. In our study, we examined a TCGA dataset and found that the transcripts per million (TPM) value of SENP3 is high in sarcoma, including osteosarcoma (OS). We found that SENP3 was highly expressed in OS cancer tissues when compared with osteofibrous dysplasia tissues. The survival data of SENP3 in TCGA showed that the sarcoma patients with higher SENP3 expression levels showed poor prognosis. In vitro, SENP3 knockdown in OS cancer cells inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and induced apoptosis. In contrast, SENP3 overexpression reversed these effects. Next, we found that SENP3 inhibited the expression of E-cadherin (E-Cad) by increasing methylation of the E-Cad promoter. Finally, E-Cad expression was increased in the OS cell line MG63 following methylation, and the cell proliferation, migration, and invasion capacity were decreased. In summary, SENP3 played a significant role in OS carcinogenesis and may act as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of OS.
SENP3, a sentrin/SUMO2/3-specific protease, is recognized as a transcriptional factor that accumulates under cellular oxidative stress and plays a significant role in the removal of SUMO2/3 modification. In our study, we examined a TCGA dataset and found that the transcripts per million (TPM) value of SENP3 is high in sarcoma, including osteosarcoma (OS). We found that SENP3 was highly expressed in OS cancer tissues when compared with osteofibrous dysplasia tissues. The survival data of SENP3 in TCGA showed that the sarcomapatients with higher SENP3 expression levels showed poor prognosis. In vitro, SENP3 knockdown in OS cancer cells inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and induced apoptosis. In contrast, SENP3 overexpression reversed these effects. Next, we found that SENP3 inhibited the expression of E-cadherin (E-Cad) by increasing methylation of the E-Cad promoter. Finally, E-Cad expression was increased in the OS cell line MG63 following methylation, and the cell proliferation, migration, and invasion capacity were decreased. In summary, SENP3 played a significant role in OS carcinogenesis and may act as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of OS.
Entities:
Keywords:
DNA methylation; E-cadherin; SENP3; cancer metastasis; osteosarcoma
Osteosarcoma is known as the most common aggressive and malignant tumor from bone,
with a peak in incidence during childhood and adolescence.[1] The incidence of osteosarcoma is estimated at 5 per million people.[2] Osteosarcoma accounted for approximately 5% of childhood cancers and also
almost 8.9% of childhood cancer-related deaths.[3] The high aggressiveness of OS leads to cancer spread within the diaphysis;
migration to soft tissues, nerves, and vessels; and tumor metastasis in the lung,
indicating the poor prognosis of OS.[4] Despite the development of complex technology for treatment in recent
decades, early diagnoses and molecule-targeted strategies against metastatic OS have
not achieved remarkable progress.[5] The clinical outcomes and prognosis of OS have not noticeably improved, and
the 5-year survival of OS patients is less than 50%.[6] The slow development of diagnostic and targeted therapy strategies is mainly
due to the limited understanding of the biology underpinning the high malignancy of OS.[7]Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells plays a significant role in
cancer metastasis.[8,9] Cadherins exert functions at intercellular level, mainly communicating by
cell connections through calcium ion-dependent binding. Instead, at an intracellular
level, cadherins bind to catenin molecules establishing links with the cytoskeleton.[10] The remarkable increase in N-cadherin and decrease in E-cadherin (E-Cad) is
the major biological feature of EMT, resulting in stroma-oriented adhesion and
conversion of epithelial cells to a mesenchymal phenotype.[11,12] Accumulated evidence has shown that many signaling pathways are involved in
accelerating the EMT of OS cells and are essential to OS development and
pathological processes. Cadherins is the emerging targets appeared with reference to
the OS microenvironment and critical proteins in OS regulation circuits.[13] The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway can significantly
promote invasion and metastasis by inducing EMT in OS cells.[14,15] The Wnt-β-catenin pathway plays an oncogenic role in OS by increasing the
expression of key molecules of EMT, such as N-cadherin and vimentin.[16,17] In addition, the dysregulated expression of the non-coding RNAs involved in
regulating EMT progression plays a crucial role in human EMT-induced carcinogenesis.[18,19]SENP3 is a sentrin/SUMO2/3-specific protease and a critical redox-sensitive molecule
that participates in the removal of SUMO2/3 modification. Recent studies have shown
that SENP3 can serve as a core regulator of proliferation, tumorigenesis,
angiogenesis, and EMT in cancer cells.[20-22] However, the involvement and function of SENP3 in OS carcinogenesis
progression and its clinical and prognostic value in OS are unclear. Here, we tested
SENP3 expression in OS tissues and examined its function and molecular mechanism in
OS cell lines. Our results lend novel insights into the regulation of SENP3, which
has key roles in OS progression and may aid in identifying new biomarkers or
targeted therapies for OS.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines and Tissue
The human OS cell line MG63 was purchased from the Cancer Research Institute
(Central South University, Hunan, China) and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% penicillin
under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Human OS tissues, osteofibrous
dysplasia (OFD) tissues and 40 OS Paraffin section were collected from patients
who underwent surgical operation and were pathologically diagnosed at the Third
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2017 to December 2018.
All patients provided informed consent before undergoing surgical biopsy. All
experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital
of Central South University.
Tissue RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA, USA). For qRT-PCR, RNA from the samples was reverse transcribed using a
PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). For Twist and E-Cad
expression, qRT-PCR was performed using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit (Takara,
Dalian, China) with the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules,
CA, USA). PCR amplification was performed in triplicate. The following qRT-PCR
primers were used:E-Cad Real-time F: 5’-CAGCCTTCTTTTCGGAAGACT-3E-Cad Real-time R: 5’-GGTAGACAGCTCCCTATGACTG-3SENP3 Real-time F: 5′ -GGAGTCCGCAGTCTTACGAG-3′SENP3 Real-time R: 5′ -TCTGGAGGACCTGGTAGAGG-3′Actin Real-time F: 5’-GCTATGTCGCCCTGGATTTC-3′Actin Real-time R: 5′ -CACAGGACTCCATACCCAAGAA-3′
Western Blotting
Biopsy tissue cells and cancer cells were washed with PBS and then lysed on ice
using RIPA buffer containing 10% proteinase inhibitor (Roche Applied Science,
Basel, Switzerland) for 0.5 h. Proteins were quantified using a Total Protein
Extraction Kit (ProMab, Richmond, CA, USA), separated using a 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane.
The membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-Twist
(1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab50887), anti-E-Cad (1:50, Abcam, ab15148), and
anti-β-Actin (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; #3700 S) at
4°C overnight; then, HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were added at 37°C for
1 h. The signals of the immunoreactive protein bands were assessed using
densitometric analysis software and quantified by densitometry using the ImageJ
system. β-actin served as a loading control.
Invasion and Migration Assays
The migration capacity of MG63 cells was evaluated using a wound-healing assay.
Cells (1 × 105 per mL) were cultivated in 6-well plates and grown to
85–90% confluence. A 1-µL tip was used to scratch a wound in the middle of the
monolayer, and the dislodged cellular debris was washed away with 10% PBS. The
cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. The wound was
photographed at 0 h and 48 h under a microscope.The invasion capacity of MG63 was detected using a Transwell assay. Cells (2 ×
105) in 200 µL serum-free medium were added to the top of an
apical chamber; the lower chamber contained 500 µL of 20% FBS. After incubation
for 48 h at 37°C, the invaded cells that traversed the membrane were fixed with
100% methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Cells remaining on the upper
chamber surface of the Transwell membrane were wiped off using a cotton bud. The
number of invaded tumor cells was captured randomly at 6 visual fields at 20×
magnification.
Cell Proliferation Bioassays
The pre-treated MG63 cells were cultivated in 96-well plates (500 cells per
well). Cell proliferation after co-culture or transfection was determined using
a commercial 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
assay kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. First, 50 µL MTT was added to cells in each well and incubated for
4 h. Then, 150 µL dimethyl sulfoxide was added to dissolve the MTT crystals. The
light absorption value of each well was measured using a spectrometer at 570 nm.
All assays were repeated at least 3 times in triplicate wells.
Cell Apoptosis Assays
Cell cycle and apoptosis assays were performed using flow cytometry. The
pre-treated MG63 cells were cultivated in 6-well plates for 48 h and then
harvested by centrifugation. For apoptosis assays, cells were trypsinized,
washed, resuspended in 200 µL binding buffer, and then evaluated for apoptosis
by double staining with 5 µL 7-aminoactinomycin D and 5 µL annexin V (all from
BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer.
DNA Methylation Analysis
Tissue DNA was extracted from cells using the phenol/chloroform method. The
bisulfite detection method was used to examine the methylation status of the
E-Cad promoter region.For bisulfite conversion, the QIAGEN EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden,
Germany) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA methylation
was determined by PCR, and the primer sequences used to examine the methylation
status of promoter region DNA are as follows:E-Cad-Met F1: 5’-TGTAGTTACGTATTTATTTTTAGTGGCGTC-3’E-Cad-Met R1: 5’-CGAATACGATCGAATCGAACCG-3’ (methylation primers)E-Cad-unMet F1: 5’-TGGTTGTAGTTATGTATTTATTTTTAGTGGTGTT-3’E-Cad-unMet R1: 5’-ACACCAAATACAATCAAATCAAACCAAA-3’ (non-methylation primers)
Statistical Analysis
The expression levels of SENP3 and E-Cad in OS and OFD tissues were analyzed by
unpaired t-test. The statistical software package GraphPrism version 5.0
(GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical
analyses. All experiments were performed in triplicate at the minimum, and the
results of the analysis were considered significant in a log-rank test if
p < 0.05.
Results
SENP3 Is Highly Expressed in Sarcomas and OS
The TCGA dataset showed that the transcripts per million (TPM) value of SENP3 is
the highest in many types of humancancers (Figure 1A). To assess SENP3 function in
OS, we examined SENP3 expression in 8 OS and 3 OFD tissues using qRT-PCR and
western blotting. The results showed that SENP3 was overexpressed in 8 OS
tissues when compared with OFD tissues (Figure 1B and C). Based on the TCGA data, the high
expression of SENP3 in sarcomapatients indicated a shorter disease-free
survival (Figure 1D) and
overall survival (Figure
1E). Then we measured the expression clinicopathologic characteristic
of SENP3 on paraffin-cut section of 40 OS patients by immunohistochemical.The
expression of SENP3 was significantly related with TNM stages (p = 0.0455), and
distant metastasis (p = 0.04223; Table 1). In conclusion, SENP3 is
potentially an oncogene in sarcoma and may influence the prognosis of sarcomapatients.
Figure 1.
SENP3 is highly expressed in sarcomas and osteosarcoma. (A) The
transcripts per million (TPM) value of SENP3 is the highest of many
human cancer types. (B) SENP3 mRNA expression was higher in OS tissues
(tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.024). (C) SENP3
protein expression was higher in OS tissues (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.0005). (D, E) The TCGA dataset showed shorter
disease-free survival (p = 0.038) and overall survival (p = 0.026) with
high SENP3 expression in sarcoma.All the TCGA data set was obtained from
GEPIA website.
Table 1.
SENP3 Expression and Clinicopathologic Characteristic on 40
Specimens.
SENP3 expression
Characteristics
Total
low
high
p value
Age(years)
≥40
18
8
10
0.25734
≤40
22
6
16
Gender
male
28
11
17
0.26721
female
12
7
5
TNM stage
I-II
16
9
7
0.0455*
III-Iv
24
6
18
Distant metastasis
negative
30
20
10
0.04223*
positive
10
3
7
Lymph node metastasis
negative
23
11
12
0.96433
positive
17
8
9
Pathological Type
conventional OS
34
16
18
0.37592
Low-Grade Central OS
6
4
2
SENP3 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics on 40 OS
specimens.
SENP3 is highly expressed in sarcomas and osteosarcoma. (A) The
transcripts per million (TPM) value of SENP3 is the highest of many
humancancer types. (B) SENP3 mRNA expression was higher in OS tissues
(tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.024). (C) SENP3
protein expression was higher in OS tissues (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.0005). (D, E) The TCGA dataset showed shorter
disease-free survival (p = 0.038) and overall survival (p = 0.026) with
high SENP3 expression in sarcoma.All the TCGA data set was obtained from
GEPIA website.SENP3 Expression and Clinicopathologic Characteristic on 40
Specimens.SENP3 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics on 40 OS
specimens.
E-Cad Is Downregulated in OS, and the Promoter Region Shows Abnormal
Methylation of CpG Islands
Since SENP3 can serve as a core EMT regulator in both the occurrence and
development of cancers,[20] we examined the expression of EMT-related factors. The results showed
lower E-Cad mRNA expression in 8 OS tissues when compared with OFD tissues the
N-Cad and Beta-Cad expression have not shown significant difference (Figure 2A). The
correlation analysis demonstrated that the expression of E-Cad mRNA was
negatively correlated with SENP3 expression in OS and OFD tissues (p = 0.035,
Figure 2B). Western
blotting analysis also confirmed these results (Figure 2C). We checked the DNA
methylation of E-Cad. The bisulfite conversion results showed that the E-Cad
promoter region of patients 1 and 2 had highly methylated bases compared with
the control (Figure 2D).
The PCR results showed that the E-Cad promoter region had more abnormal
methylation of CpG islands in 8 OS patients compared with 3 OFD patients (Figure 2E).
Figure 2.
E-cad is downregulated in osteosarcoma, and the promoter region shows
abnormal methylation of CpG islands. (A) E-Cad mRNA expression was lower
in OS tissues than in osteofibrous dysplasia (Tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.007)N-Cad and Beta mRNA expression have not
shown significant difference. (B) E-Cad mRNA expression was negatively
correlated with SENP3 expression in OS and osteofibrous dysplasia
tissues (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.035). (C)
The expression of SENP3 and E-Cad protein (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3). (D) The E-Cad promoter regions of patients 1 and 2
had highly methylated bases compared with the control. (E) The E-Cad
promoter region showed more abnormal methylation of CpG islands in 8 OS
patients compared with 3 osteofibrous dysplasia patients. (F) SENP3
overexpression in MG63 cells decreased E-Cad protein expression.
Silencing of SENP3 expression in MG63 cells increased E-Cad protein
expression. (G) Bisulfite conversion showed that SENP3 knockdown and
overexpression in MG63 cells decreased and increased the methylated base
levels of E-Cad, respectively. (H) The PCR results also confirmed the
results of bisulfite conversion.
E-cad is downregulated in osteosarcoma, and the promoter region shows
abnormal methylation of CpG islands. (A) E-Cad mRNA expression was lower
in OS tissues than in osteofibrous dysplasia (Tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.007)N-Cad and Beta mRNA expression have not
shown significant difference. (B) E-Cad mRNA expression was negatively
correlated with SENP3 expression in OS and osteofibrous dysplasia
tissues (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous dysplasia, n = 3; p = 0.035). (C)
The expression of SENP3 and E-Cad protein (tumor, n = 8; osteofibrous
dysplasia, n = 3). (D) The E-Cad promoter regions of patients 1 and 2
had highly methylated bases compared with the control. (E) The E-Cad
promoter region showed more abnormal methylation of CpG islands in 8 OS
patients compared with 3 osteofibrous dysplasiapatients. (F) SENP3
overexpression in MG63 cells decreased E-Cad protein expression.
Silencing of SENP3 expression in MG63 cells increased E-Cad protein
expression. (G) Bisulfite conversion showed that SENP3 knockdown and
overexpression in MG63 cells decreased and increased the methylated base
levels of E-Cad, respectively. (H) The PCR results also confirmed the
results of bisulfite conversion.
SENP3 Regulates E-Cad Expression and Induces the DNA Methylation of
E-Cad
As SENP3 was highly expressed in OS and its expression was negatively related to
E-Cad, we explored the effect of SENP3 on E-Cad expression. Western blotting
analysis showed that SENP3 overexpression in MG63 cells decreased the protein
expression of E-Cad, and silencing SENP3 expression in MG63 cells increased the
protein expression of E-Cad (Figure 2F). To investigate the impact of SENP3 on DNA methylation of
E-cad, we detected methylated bases using bisulfite conversion. Knockdown of
SENP3 expression decreased the methylated base level of E-Cad, whereas SENP3
overexpression in MG63 cells increased the methylated base level of E-Cad (Figure 2G). The PCR
results also confirmed these results (Figure 2H).
SENP3 Regulates Cell Invasion, Migration, Proliferation, and Apoptosis in
MG63 Cells
As SENP3 regulates E-Cad expression, we further explored the effect of SENP3 on
invasion, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis of MG63 cells. The effects of
silencing or overexpression of SENP3 on cell invasion and migration were
examined by Transwell and wound-healing assays, respectively. Silencing SENP3
expression decreased cell invasion and migration, whereas overexpressing SENP3
expression increased cell migration (Figure 3A and B). Cell proliferation and apoptosis were
detected by MTT and flow cytometry, respectively. Knockdown of SENP3 expression
decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis, while overexpressing SENP3
increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis (Figure 3C and D).
Figure 3.
SENP3 regulates cell invasion, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis in
MG63 cells. (A) SENP3 overexpression increased the invasion of MG63
cells (p = 0.0036). SENP3 knockdown decreased cell invasion (p =
0.0022). (B) SENP3 overexpression increased the migration of MG63 cells
(p = 0.0074). SENP3 knockdown decreased cell migration (p = 0.0013). (C)
SENP3 overexpression increased the proliferation of MG63 cells. SENP3
knockdown decreased cell proliferation. (D) SENP3 overexpression
decreased cell apoptosis in MG63 cells (p = 0.0010), and SENP3 knockdown
increased cell apoptosis (p = 0.00011).
SENP3 regulates cell invasion, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis in
MG63 cells. (A) SENP3 overexpression increased the invasion of MG63
cells (p = 0.0036). SENP3 knockdown decreased cell invasion (p =
0.0022). (B) SENP3 overexpression increased the migration of MG63 cells
(p = 0.0074). SENP3 knockdown decreased cell migration (p = 0.0013). (C)
SENP3 overexpression increased the proliferation of MG63 cells. SENP3
knockdown decreased cell proliferation. (D) SENP3 overexpression
decreased cell apoptosis in MG63 cells (p = 0.0010), and SENP3 knockdown
increased cell apoptosis (p = 0.00011).
DNA Methylation Inhibitors Can Reverse SENP3-Induced Methylation Effects on
E-Cad and Cell Phenotypes
We further examined the effect of DNA methylation inhibitors on E-Cad expression
and DNA methylation status. We treated MG63 cells with the DNA methylation
inhibitors azartidine and 5-aza-DC. The DNA methylation inhibitors increased
E-Cad expression, reversed SENP3-induced E-Cad downregulation (Figure 4A and B), and decreased the DNA
methylation of E-Cad (Figure
4C). The Transwell and wound-healing assays indicated that DNA
methylation inhibitors reversed the SENP3-induced promotion of the invasion,
migration, proliferation, and apoptosis of MG63 cells (Figure 4D-G).
Figure 4.
DNA methylation inhibitors can reverse SENP3-induced methylation effects
on E-Cad and cell phenotypes. (A, B) The DNA methylation inhibitors
increased the expression of E-cad protein and reversed the SENP3-induced
downregulation of E-Cad. (C) The DNA methylation inhibitors decreased
the DNA methylation of E-Cad. (D) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed SENP3-induced promotion of cell invasion of MG63 cells
(5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0008; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0006; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0003; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0002). (E) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed the SENP3-induced promotion of MG63 cell migration
(5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0076; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0113; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0008; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0001). (F) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed the SENP3-induced promotion of MG63 cell proliferation. (G) The
DNA methylation inhibitors reversed the SENP3-induced apoptosis of MG63
cells (5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0002; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0001; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0010; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0003).
DNA methylation inhibitors can reverse SENP3-induced methylation effects
on E-Cad and cell phenotypes. (A, B) The DNA methylation inhibitors
increased the expression of E-cad protein and reversed the SENP3-induced
downregulation of E-Cad. (C) The DNA methylation inhibitors decreased
the DNA methylation of E-Cad. (D) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed SENP3-induced promotion of cell invasion of MG63 cells
(5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0008; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0006; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0003; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0002). (E) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed the SENP3-induced promotion of MG63 cell migration
(5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0076; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0113; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0008; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0001). (F) The DNA methylation inhibitors
reversed the SENP3-induced promotion of MG63 cell proliferation. (G) The
DNA methylation inhibitors reversed the SENP3-induced apoptosis of MG63
cells (5-aza-DC-treated group, p = 0.0002; Azartidine-treated group, p =
0.0001; 5-aza-DC + SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0010; Azartidine +
SENP3-treated group, p = 0.0003).
Discussion
OS is a highly malignant bone tumor that remains the major cause of mortality in bone
tumors worldwide.[23] The incidence of OS is high in childhood and adolescence, with an annual
global incidence rate of about 3 in 1 million.[24,25] To enhance OS therapy, new molecular targets for its diagnosis and prognosis
must be identified, and new treatments must be developed.As a member of the SUMO-specific protease family, the function of SENP3 is known to
regulate deSUMOylation of chromosome-associated proteins and chromosome stability in
multiple cellular biological processes.[26,27] Hypoxia is a common phenomenon in human solid tumors. Recent studies have
shown that SENP3 is a sensitive redox sensor, as SENP3 upregulation in cells is
triggered by oxidative modification and is responsible for HIF-1α transactivation.
These studies indicated that SENP3 may play a key role in tumor development.[28,29]Growing evidence has confirmed that SENP3 is highly expressed in some types of
malignant tumors, such as head and neck cancer,[30] ovarian cancer,[31] and gastric cancer.[22] Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies. Here, we firstly
report that the TPM of SENP3 in sarcoma is the highest among many humancancer
types, as analysis of a TCGA dataset demonstrated that SENP3 was upregulated in OS
compared to that in non-tumor tissues. Additionally, SENP3 upregulation was
significantly correlated with poor prognosis in sarcoma, suggesting that SENP3 may
serve as a diagnostic biomarker and a novel therapeutic target for OS. Furthermore,
upregulating SENP3 significantly promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion
of OS cancer cell lines, downregulating SENP3 by shRNA markedly inhibited MG63
proliferation, migration, and invasion, these indicated that SENP3 can act as an
essential character in the development of OS cancer and may be an importantly
oncogene of OS.EMT is one of the core mechanisms for transforming epithelial cells into epithelial
cancer cells by imparting migratory and invasive capabilities.[32] There is growing evidence that transcription factors participate in the
biological processes of EMT and that abnormal expression of some transcription
factors can promote malignant tumor occurrence and development by inducing EMT
progression, including ZEB1,[33] STAT3,[34] TWIST1,[35] and FOXQ1.[36] This paper firstly reports SENP3 as a transcription factor that can regulate
the EMT of OS cells by inducing the DNA methylation of E-Cad, and our research
provides a novel perspective in understanding the role of the SUMO-specific protease
family in OS initiation and promotion.E-Cad is a hallmark of adherens junctions, which play a pivotal role in maintaining
the stability of epithelial cells, and a decrease in E-Cad expression can trigger
EMT in cancer.[37] The cadherin switch hypothesis indicates that the loss of E-Cad and increases
in N-cadherin and vimentin are the major features of EMT.[37,38] Downregulation of E-Cad promotes tumor invasion and migration, and
post-translational modification is the main manner by which E-cad transcriptional
activity is regulated, including acetylation, methylation, and poly- and mono-ubiquitination.[39,40] In ovarian cancer-Knockdown of SENP3 decreased the proliferation, migration,
and invasion capability of ovarian cancer cells, down-regulated the expression of
N-cadherin, and resulted in upregulation of p21 and E-cadherin, which indicated that
SENP3 was a redox-sensitive molecule mediating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition.[31] Consistent with these results, in our study, SENP3 regulated E-Cad expression
and induced the DNA methylation of E-cad in the OS carcinogenesis process, hence
providing the first evidence for the SENP3/E-Cad EMT axis in OS cells. However, the
exact mechanism by which SENP3 regulates the DNA methylation of E-Cad needs to be
investigated further.In conclusion, SENP3 plays key role in the development of osteosarcoma.SENP3
expression was highly expressed in OS, and SENP3 upregulation significantly
increased the invasion, migration, and proliferation abilities and suppressed
apoptosis of OS cells. Furthermore, SENP3 is potentially an oncogene in OS and may
influence the prognosis of sarcomapatients. The inhibition or overexpression of
SENP3 expression can respectively decrease or increase the DNA methylation of E-Cad.
Our research indicates that SENP3 may be a prognostic biomarker and an actionable
target for novel tumor therapies for OS.