Literature DB >> 33028708

Potential impact of tuberculosis vaccines in China, South Africa, and India.

Rebecca C Harris1, Tom Sumner2, Gwenan M Knight2, Hui Zhang3, Richard G White1.   

Abstract

More effective tuberculosis vaccines are needed to help reach World Health Organization tuberculosis elimination goals. Insufficient evidence exists on the potential impact of future tuberculosis vaccines with varying characteristics and in different epidemiological settings. To inform vaccine development decision making, we modeled the impact of hypothetical tuberculosis vaccines in three high-burden countries. We calibrated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) transmission models to age-stratified demographic and epidemiological data from China, South Africa, and India. We varied vaccine efficacy to prevent infection or disease, effective in persons M.tb uninfected or infected, and duration of protection. We modeled routine early-adolescent vaccination and 10-yearly mass campaigns from 2025. We estimated median percentage population-level tuberculosis incidence rate reduction (IRR) in 2050 compared to a no new vaccine scenario. In all settings, results suggested vaccines preventing disease in M.tb-infected populations would have greatest impact by 2050 (10-year, 70% efficacy against disease, IRR 51%, 52%, and 54% in China, South Africa, and India, respectively). Vaccines preventing reinfection delivered lower potential impact (IRR 1, 12, and 17%). Intermediate impact was predicted for vaccines effective only in uninfected populations, if preventing infection (IRR 21, 37, and 50%) or disease (IRR 19, 36, and 51%), with greater impact in higher-transmission settings. Tuberculosis vaccines have the potential to deliver substantial population-level impact. For prioritizing impact by 2050, vaccine development should focus on preventing disease in M.tb-infected populations. Preventing infection or disease in uninfected populations may be useful in higher transmission settings. As vaccine impact depended on epidemiology, different development strategies may be required.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33028708     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax4607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  8 in total

1.  Affordability of Adult Tuberculosis Vaccination in India and China: A Dynamic Transmission Model-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Chathika Krishan Weerasuriya; Rebecca Claire Harris; Matthew Quaife; Christopher Finn McQuaid; Richard G White; Gabriela B Gomez
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11

Review 2.  Accelerating research and development of new vaccines against tuberculosis: a global roadmap.

Authors:  Frank Cobelens; Rajinder Kumar Suri; Michelle Helinski; Michael Makanga; Ana Lúcia Weinberg; Britta Schaffmeister; Frank Deege; Mark Hatherill
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 71.421

Review 3.  It Takes a Village: The Multifaceted Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Vaccine-Induced Immunity.

Authors:  Sasha E Larsen; Brittany D Williams; Maham Rais; Rhea N Coler; Susan L Baldwin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Building the concept for WHO Evidence Considerations for Vaccine Policy (ECVP): Tuberculosis vaccines intended for adults and adolescents as a test case.

Authors:  Sonali Kochhar; Draurio Barreira; Pauline Beattie; Marco Cavaleri; Alejandro Cravioto; Mike W Frick; Ann M Ginsberg; Ian Hudson; David C Kaslow; Sherry Kurtz; Christian Lienhardt; Shabir A Madhi; Christopher Morgan; Yalda Momeni; Deepali Patel; Helen Rees; Taryn Rogalski-Salter; Alexander Schmidt; Boitumelo Semete-Makokotlela; Gerald Voss; Richard G White; Matteo Zignol; Birgitte Giersing
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Updating age-specific contact structures to match evolving demography in a dynamic mathematical model of tuberculosis vaccination.

Authors:  Chathika Krishan Weerasuriya; Rebecca Claire Harris; Christopher Finn McQuaid; Gabriela B Gomez; Richard G White
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Evaluation of early innate and adaptive immune responses to the TB vaccine Mycobacterium bovis BCG and vaccine candidate BCGΔBCG1419c.

Authors:  Manuja Gunasena; Rajni Kant Shukla; Naiquan Yao; Oscar Rosas Mejia; Michael D Powell; Kenneth J Oestreich; Michel de Jesús Aceves-Sánchez; Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez; Namal P M Liyanage; Richard T Robinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine?

Authors:  Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Cost-effectiveness of routine adolescent vaccination with an M72/AS01E-like tuberculosis vaccine in South Africa and India.

Authors:  Rebecca C Harris; Matthew Quaife; Chathika Weerasuriya; Gabriela B Gomez; Tom Sumner; Fiammetta Bozzani; Richard G White
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.