Literature DB >> 33027675

Exposure to Static Magnetic and Electric Fields Treats Type 2 Diabetes.

Calvin S Carter1, Sunny C Huang2, Charles C Searby3, Benjamin Cassaidy3, Michael J Miller4, Wojciech J Grzesik5, Ted B Piorczynski6, Thomas K Pak2, Susan A Walsh7, Michael Acevedo7, Qihong Zhang3, Kranti A Mapuskar8, Ginger L Milne9, Antentor O Hinton5, Deng-Fu Guo10, Robert Weiss11, Kyle Bradberry5, Eric B Taylor12, Adam J Rauckhorst12, David W Dick7, Vamsidhar Akurathi7, Kelly C Falls-Hubert13, Brett A Wagner8, Walter A Carter3, Kai Wang14, Andrew W Norris15, Kamal Rahmouni10, Garry R Buettner8, Jason M Hansen6, Douglas R Spitz8, E Dale Abel16, Val C Sheffield17.   

Abstract

Aberrant redox signaling underlies the pathophysiology of many chronic metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methodologies aimed at rebalancing systemic redox homeostasis have had limited success. A noninvasive, sustained approach would enable the long-term control of redox signaling for the treatment of T2D. We report that static magnetic and electric fields (sBE) noninvasively modulate the systemic GSH-to-GSSG redox couple to promote a healthier systemic redox environment that is reducing. Strikingly, when applied to mouse models of T2D, sBE rapidly ameliorates insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in as few as 3 days with no observed adverse effects. Scavenging paramagnetic byproducts of oxygen metabolism with SOD2 in hepatic mitochondria fully abolishes these insulin sensitizing effects, demonstrating that mitochondrial superoxide mediates induction of these therapeutic changes. Our findings introduce a remarkable redox-modulating phenomenon that exploits endogenous electromagneto-receptive mechanisms for the noninvasive treatment of T2D, and potentially other redox-related diseases.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ROS; electromagnetic fields; glutathione; insulin resistance; liver; mitochondria; radical pair mechanism; redox; superoxide; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2020        PMID: 33027675      PMCID: PMC7819711          DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Metab        ISSN: 1550-4131            Impact factor:   27.287


  83 in total

Review 1.  Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple.

Authors:  F Q Schafer; G R Buettner
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Further studies on the properties and assay of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase of rat liver.

Authors:  G E GLOCK; P McLEAN
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1953-10       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Free radicals and diabetes.

Authors:  L W Oberley
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 4.  Redox regulation of insulin sensitivity due to enhanced fatty acid utilization in the mitochondria.

Authors:  Paul M Rindler; Clair L Crewe; Jolyn Fernandes; Michael Kinter; Luke I Szweda
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Emilie Mas; Christine Ginet; Françoise Michel; Laetitia Villon; Jean-Paul Cristol; Claude Colette
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Considerations in the design of hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in the conscious mouse.

Authors:  Julio E Ayala; Deanna P Bracy; Owen P McGuinness; David H Wasserman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Early Time-Restricted Feeding Improves Insulin Sensitivity, Blood Pressure, and Oxidative Stress Even without Weight Loss in Men with Prediabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Sutton; Robbie Beyl; Kate S Early; William T Cefalu; Eric Ravussin; Courtney M Peterson
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Mitochondrial Superoxide Increases Age-Associated Susceptibility of Human Dermal Fibroblasts to Radiation and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kranti A Mapuskar; Kyle H Flippo; Joshua D Schoenfeld; Dennis P Riley; Stefan Strack; Taher Abu Hejleh; Muhammad Furqan; Varun Monga; Frederick E Domann; John M Buatti; Prabhat C Goswami; Douglas R Spitz; Bryan G Allen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Magnetoreception through cryptochrome may involve superoxide.

Authors:  Ilia A Solov'yov; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Regulation of Insulin Receptor Trafficking by Bardet Biedl Syndrome Proteins.

Authors:  Rachel D Starks; Andreas M Beyer; Deng Fu Guo; Lauren Boland; Qihong Zhang; Val C Sheffield; Kamal Rahmouni
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  9 in total

1.  The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is vulnerable to moderate electric fields.

Authors:  Claudia R Arbeitman; Pablo Rojas; Pedro Ojeda-May; Martin E Garcia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  A Static Magnetic Field Improves Iron Metabolism and Prevents High-Fat-Diet/Streptozocin-Induced Diabetes.

Authors:  Biao Yu; Juanjuan Liu; Jing Cheng; Lei Zhang; Chao Song; Xiaofei Tian; Yixiang Fan; Yue Lv; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Innovation (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Reply to Petersen et al.: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Calvin S Carter; Sunny C Huang; Charles C Searby; Benjamin Cassaidy; Michael J Miller; Wojciech J Grzesik; Ted B Piorczynski; Thomas K Pak; Susan A Walsh; Michael Acevedo; Qihong Zhang; Kranti A Mapuskar; Ginger L Milne; Antentor O Hinton; Deng-Fu Guo; Robert Weiss; Kyle Bradberry; Eric B Taylor; Adam J Rauckhorst; David W Dick; Vamsidhar Akurathi; Kelly C Falls-Hubert; Brett A Wagner; Walter A Carter; Kai Wang; Andrew W Norris; Kamal Rahmouni; Garry R Buettner; Jason M Hansen; Douglas R Spitz; E Dale Abel; Val C Sheffield
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.900

4.  Counterpoint: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Calvin S Carter; Sunny C Huang; Charles C Searby; Benjamin Cassaidy; Michael J Miller; Wojciech J Grzesik; Ted B Piorczynski; Thomas K Pak; Susan A Walsh; Michael Acevedo; Qihong Zhang; Kranti A Mapuskar; Ginger L Milne; Antentor O Hinton; Deng-Fu Guo; Robert Weiss; Kyle Bradberry; Eric B Taylor; Adam J Rauckhorst; David W Dick; Vamsidhar Akurathi; Kelly C Falls-Hubert; Brett A Wagner; Walter A Carter; Kai Wang; Andrew W Norris; Kamal Rahmouni; Garry R Buettner; Jason M Hansen; Douglas R Spitz; E Dale Abel; Val C Sheffield
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.900

5.  Electromagnetic Fields Ameliorate Insulin Resistance and Hepatic Steatosis by Modulating Redox Homeostasis and SREBP-1c Expression in db/db Mice.

Authors:  Mingming Zhai; Xi Yan; Jiangzheng Liu; Zi Long; Siyan Zhao; Wendan Li; Ying Liu; Chunxu Hai
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Moderate Static Magnet Fields Suppress Ovarian Cancer Metastasis via ROS-Mediated Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Chao Song; Biao Yu; Junjun Wang; Xinmiao Ji; Lei Zhang; Xiaofei Tian; Xin Yu; Chuanlin Feng; Xinyu Wang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Static Magnetic Fields Reduce Oxidative Stress to Improve Wound Healing and Alleviate Diabetic Complications.

Authors:  Chuanlin Feng; Biao Yu; Chao Song; Junjun Wang; Lei Zhang; Xinmiao Ji; Ying Wang; Yanwen Fang; Zhongcai Liao; Min Wei; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

9.  Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach.

Authors:  Uloma Igara Uche; Olga V Naidenko
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.