| Literature DB >> 33727836 |
Mingming Zhai1, Xi Yan2, Jiangzheng Liu3, Zi Long3, Siyan Zhao4, Wendan Li4, Ying Liu4, Chunxu Hai3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which has recently become known as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), has risen. However, pharmacotherapies for this disease have not been approved. Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have excellent bioeffects on multiple diseases. However, the effects of EMFs on NAFLD are unknown. This study investigated the bioeffects of EMF exposure on insulin resistance, liver redox homeostasis and hepatic steatosis in db/db mice.Entities:
Keywords: electromagnetic fields; hepatic steatosis; insulin resistance; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; oxidative stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 33727836 PMCID: PMC7954280 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S294020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.168
Figure 1Schematic representation of EMF exposure system and output waveform. The exposure waveform comprises a pulsed burst (burst width, 5 ms; pulse width, 0.2 ms; pulse wait, 0.02 ms; burst wait, 60 ms; pulse rise, 0.3 μs; pulse fall, 2.0 μs) repeated at 15 Hz.
Figure 2Effect of EMF on IR in db/db mice. (A) Data of fasting blood glucose. (B) Data of fasting blood insulin. (C) Results of HOMA-IR. *P<0.05, compared with control; #P<0.05, compared with db/db group.
Figure 3Effects of EMF exposure on redox homeostasis. (A) Liver MDA content. (B) Liver GSSG content. (C) Liver GSH content. (D) Activity/unit of CAT. (E) Activity/unit of SOD. (F) Activity/unit of GSH-Px. (G) Original recording and quantification of Western blotting. Values are all expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05, compared with control; #P<0.05, compared with db/db group.
Figure 4Effects of EMF exposure on liver and SREBP-1c expression. (A) Weight of body. (B) Weight of liver. (C) Liver triglyceride content. (D) Oil Red O staining (×20). (E) Percentage of lipid droplets. (F) Liver SREBP-1c expression. Values are all expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.05, compared with control; #P<0.05, compared with db/db group.