Literature DB >> 33027064

Sensitivity analysis of FDG PET tumor voxel cluster radiomics and dosimetry for predicting mid-chemoradiation regional response of locally advanced lung cancer.

Chunyan Duan1, W Art Chaovalitwongse, Fangyun Bai, Daniel S Hippe, Shouyi Wang, Phawis Thammasorn, Larry A Pierce, Xiao Liu, Jianxin You, Robert S Miyaoka, Hubert J Vesselle, Paul E Kinahan, Ramesh Rengan, Jing Zeng, Stephen R Bowen.   

Abstract

We investigated the sensitivity of regional tumor response prediction to variability in voxel clustering techniques, imaging features, and machine learning algorithms in 25 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) enrolled on the FLARE-RT clinical trial. Metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) from pre-chemoradiation (PETpre) and mid-chemoradiation fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG PET) images (PETmid) were subdivided into K-means or hierarchical voxel clusters by standardized uptake values (SUV) and 3D-positions. MTV cluster separability was evaluated by CH index, and morphologic changes were captured by Dice similarity and centroid Euclidean distance. PETpre conventional features included SUVmean, MTV/MTV cluster size, and mean radiation dose. PETpre radiomics consisted of 41 intensity histogram and 3D texture features (PET Oncology Radiomics Test Suite) extracted from MTV or MTV clusters. Machine learning models (multiple linear regression, support vector regression, logistic regression, support vector machines) of conventional features or radiomic features were constructed to predict PETmid response. Leave-one-out-cross-validated root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) for continuous response regression (ΔSUVmean) and area-under-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUC) for binary response classification were calculated. K-means MTV 2-clusters (MTVhi, MTVlo) achieved maximum CH index separability (Friedman p < 0.001). Between PETpre and PETmid, MTV cluster pairs overlapped (Dice 0.70-0.87) and migrated 0.6-1.1 cm. PETmid ΔSUVmean response prediction was superior in MTV and MTVlo (RMSE = 0.17-0.21) compared to MTVhi (RMSE = 0.42-0.52, Friedman p < 0.001). PETmid ΔSUVmean response class prediction performance trended higher in MTVlo (AUC = 0.83-0.88) compared to MTVhi (AUC = 0.44-0.58, Friedman p = 0.052). Models were more sensitive to MTV/MTV cluster regions (Friedman p = 0.026) than feature sets/algorithms (Wilcoxon signed-rank p = 0.36). Top-ranked radiomic features included GLZSM-LZHGE (large-zone-high-SUV), GTSDM-CP (cluster-prominence), GTSDM-CS (cluster-shade) and NGTDM-CNT (contrast). Top-ranked features were consistent between MTVhi and MTVlo cluster pairs but varied between MTVhi-MTVlo clusters, reflecting distinct regional radiomic phenotypes. Variability in tumor voxel cluster response prediction can inform robust radiomic target definition for risk-adaptive chemoradiation in patients with LA-NSCLC. FLARE-RT trial: NCT02773238.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33027064      PMCID: PMC7593986          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb0c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  68 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Elleny Panayiotou; Kate Burnand; Sabina Dizdarevic; Ken Miles
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  M Vallières; C R Freeman; S R Skamene; I El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Deep Learning Predicts Lung Cancer Treatment Response from Serial Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Yiwen Xu; Ahmed Hosny; Roman Zeleznik; Chintan Parmar; Thibaud Coroller; Idalid Franco; Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The maximum uptake of (18)F-deoxyglucose on positron emission tomography scan correlates with survival, hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and GLUT-1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Angela van Baardwijk; Christophe Dooms; Robert Jan van Suylen; Erik Verbeken; Monique Hochstenbag; Cary Dehing-Oberije; Dennis Rupa; Silvia Pastorekova; Sigrid Stroobants; Ulrich Buell; Philippe Lambin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding Method with the Least Information Loss for Macromolecular Simulations.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhou; Feng Wang; Peng Tao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Repeatability of Radiomic Features in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT Studies: Impact of Reconstruction and Delineation.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Gerbrand M Kramer; Virginie Frings; Ida A Nissen; Emma R Mulder; Adrianus J de Langen; Otto S Hoekstra; Egbert F Smit; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Chris J Rose; John C Waterton; Richard A D Carano; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Baderaldeen A Altazi; Geoffrey G Zhang; Daniel C Fernandez; Michael E Montejo; Dylan Hunt; Joan Werner; Matthew C Biagioli; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.