OBJECTIVE: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes numerous domains to assess functioning among the pediatric population. These domains, however, have not been evaluated for use in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this study was to determine the measurement properties of PROMIS domains (pain behavior, pain quality, physical stress experience, physical activity, strength impact, and profile-25) in children with T1D. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of children with T1Drecruited from tertiary care facilities. To determine construct validity, we compared PROMIS T-scores between known-groups based on (a) glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) and (b) self-reported general health, using t test or analysis of variance. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha and item response theory reliability. We also determined agreement between parent-proxy and child self-report PROMIS scores. RESULTS: Our study included 192 children, mean age 12.7 (SD = 2.9) years, eligible to self-report PROMIS surveys. There were significant differences in physical stress experience and pain intensity between children with HbA1c < 10% and those with HbA1c ≥ 10%. There also were significant differences in T-scores for all domains except physical function mobility and strength impact among children with poor/fair, good, very good/excellent general health. All valid domains had reliability >0.70. More than 40% of child-parent pairs were in agreement, with intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) ranging between 0.41 and 0.63 for all domains, except pain behavior (%agreement = 23%; ICC = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the PROMIS domains tested are valid, reliable, and able to differentiate children with T1D who report different general health states. There is moderate agreement between child-parent pairs for all domains except pain behavior.
OBJECTIVE: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) includes numerous domains to assess functioning among the pediatric population. These domains, however, have not been evaluated for use in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this study was to determine the measurement properties of PROMIS domains (pain behavior, pain quality, physical stress experience, physical activity, strength impact, and profile-25) in children with T1D. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of children with T1Drecruited from tertiary care facilities. To determine construct validity, we compared PROMIS T-scores between known-groups based on (a) glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) and (b) self-reported general health, using t test or analysis of variance. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha and item response theory reliability. We also determined agreement between parent-proxy and child self-report PROMIS scores. RESULTS: Our study included 192 children, mean age 12.7 (SD = 2.9) years, eligible to self-report PROMIS surveys. There were significant differences in physical stress experience and pain intensity between children with HbA1c < 10% and those with HbA1c ≥ 10%. There also were significant differences in T-scores for all domains except physical function mobility and strength impact among children with poor/fair, good, very good/excellent general health. All valid domains had reliability >0.70. More than 40% of child-parent pairs were in agreement, with intraclass correlations coefficients (ICC) ranging between 0.41 and 0.63 for all domains, except pain behavior (%agreement = 23%; ICC = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the PROMIS domains tested are valid, reliable, and able to differentiate children with T1D who report different general health states. There is moderate agreement between child-parent pairs for all domains except pain behavior.
Authors: Lisa M Ingerski; Avani C Modi; Korey K Hood; Ahna L Pai; Meg Zeller; Carrie Piazza-Waggoner; Kimberly A Driscoll; Marc E Rothenberg; James Franciosi; Kevin A Hommel Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Michael G Sawyer; Katherine E Reynolds; Jennifer J Couper; Davina J French; Declan Kennedy; James Martin; Rima Staugas; Tahereh Ziaian; Peter A Baghurst Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maartje de Wit; Per Winterdijk; Henk-Jan Aanstoot; Barbara Anderson; Thomas Danne; Larry Deeb; Karin Lange; Anja Østergren Nielsen; Soren Skovlund; Mark Peyrot; Frank Snoek Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Maartje de Wit; Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal; Jan Alle Bokma; Krijn Haasnoot; Mieke C Houdijk; Reinoud J Gemke; Frank J Snoek Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Gina Agiostratidou; Henry Anhalt; Dana Ball; Lawrence Blonde; Evgenia Gourgari; Karen N Harriman; Aaron J Kowalski; Paul Madden; Alicia H McAuliffe-Fogarty; Molly McElwee-Malloy; Anne Peters; Sripriya Raman; Kent Reifschneider; Karen Rubin; Stuart A Weinzimer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 19.112