BACKGROUND: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system provided a specific 'ypTNM' stage grouping for patients with esophageal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the AJCC 8th edition ypTNM stage grouping for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We enrolled 152 patients with ESCC who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) therapy between June 2005 and December 2011. ypStage was evaluated according to the AJCC 7th and 8th editions. Predictive performance for disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between both editions. The prognostic significance of ypTNM stage grouping was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Revision of the AJCC 7th edition to the 8th edition was associated with a change in ypStage in 96 patients (63.2%). The AJCC 8th edition revealed a better predictive performance than the 7th edition in terms of DSS (Akaike's information criterion [AIC] 499 vs. 513; Bayesian information criterion [BIC] 505 versus 519; concordance index [C-index] 0.725 versus 0.679) and OS (AIC 662 vs. 674; BIC 669 vs. 681; C-index 0.662 vs. 0.622). On univariate and multivariate analyses, ypStage in the 8th edition was an independent prognostic factor for both DSS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ypTNM stage grouping in the AJCC 8th edition provided a better predictive performance for DSS and OS than that in the 7th edition. ypStage in the 8th edition was the most reliable prognostic factor for ESCC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CF therapy.
BACKGROUND: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system provided a specific 'ypTNM' stage grouping for patients with esophageal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the AJCC 8th edition ypTNM stage grouping for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: We enrolled 152 patients with ESCC who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) therapy between June 2005 and December 2011. ypStage was evaluated according to the AJCC 7th and 8th editions. Predictive performance for disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) was compared between both editions. The prognostic significance of ypTNM stage grouping was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Revision of the AJCC 7th edition to the 8th edition was associated with a change in ypStage in 96 patients (63.2%). The AJCC 8th edition revealed a better predictive performance than the 7th edition in terms of DSS (Akaike's information criterion [AIC] 499 vs. 513; Bayesian information criterion [BIC] 505 versus 519; concordance index [C-index] 0.725 versus 0.679) and OS (AIC 662 vs. 674; BIC 669 vs. 681; C-index 0.662 vs. 0.622). On univariate and multivariate analyses, ypStage in the 8th edition was an independent prognostic factor for both DSS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ypTNM stage grouping in the AJCC 8th edition provided a better predictive performance for DSS and OS than that in the 7th edition. ypStage in the 8th edition was the most reliable prognostic factor for ESCC patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CF therapy.
Authors: P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T W Rice; C Apperson-Hansen; L M DiPaola; M E Semple; T E M R Lerut; M B Orringer; L-Q Chen; W L Hofstetter; B M Smithers; V W Rusch; B P L Wijnhoven; K N Chen; A R Davies; X B D'Journo; K A Kesler; J D Luketich; M K Ferguson; J V Räsänen; R van Hillegersberg; W Fang; L Durand; W H Allum; I Cecconello; R J Cerfolio; M Pera; S M Griffin; R Burger; J-F Liu; M S Allen; S Law; T J Watson; G E Darling; W J Scott; A Duranceau; C E Denlinger; P H Schipper; H Ishwaran; E H Blackstone Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: T W Rice; L-Q Chen; W L Hofstetter; B M Smithers; V W Rusch; B P L Wijnhoven; K L Chen; A R Davies; X B D'Journo; K A Kesler; J D Luketich; M K Ferguson; J V Räsänen; R van Hillegersberg; W Fang; L Durand; I Cecconello; W H Allum; R J Cerfolio; M Pera; S M Griffin; R Burger; J-F Liu; M S Allen; S Law; T J Watson; G E Darling; W J Scott; A Duranceau; C E Denlinger; P H Schipper; T E M R Lerut; M B Orringer; H Ishwaran; C Apperson-Hansen; L M DiPaola; M E Semple; E H Blackstone Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: T W Rice; T E M R Lerut; M B Orringer; L-Q Chen; W L Hofstetter; B M Smithers; V W Rusch; J van Lanschot; K N Chen; A R Davies; X B D'Journo; K A Kesler; J D Luketich; M K Ferguson; J V Räsänen; R van Hillegersberg; W Fang; L Durand; W H Allum; I Cecconello; R J Cerfolio; M Pera; S M Griffin; R Burger; J-F Liu; M S Allen; S Law; T J Watson; G E Darling; W J Scott; A Duranceau; C E Denlinger; P H Schipper; H Ishwaran; C Apperson-Hansen; L M DiPaola; M E Semple; E H Blackstone Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.429