Literature DB >> 27731547

Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: pathologic staging data.

T W Rice1, L-Q Chen2, W L Hofstetter3, B M Smithers4, V W Rusch5, B P L Wijnhoven6, K L Chen7, A R Davies8, X B D'Journo9, K A Kesler10, J D Luketich11, M K Ferguson12, J V Räsänen13, R van Hillegersberg14, W Fang15, L Durand16, I Cecconello17, W H Allum18, R J Cerfolio19, M Pera20, S M Griffin21, R Burger22, J-F Liu23, M S Allen24, S Law25, T J Watson26, G E Darling27, W J Scott28, A Duranceau29, C E Denlinger30, P H Schipper31, T E M R Lerut32, M B Orringer33, H Ishwaran34, C Apperson-Hansen35, L M DiPaola36, M E Semple36, E H Blackstone36.   

Abstract

We report data-simple descriptions of patient characteristics, cancer categories, and non-risk-adjusted survival-for patients with pathologically staged cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction after resection or ablation with no preoperative therapy from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC). Thirty-three institutions from six continents submitted de-identified data using standard definitions: demographics, comorbidities, clinical cancer categories, and all-cause mortality from first management decision. Of 13,300 patients, 5,631 had squamous cell carcinoma, 7,558 adenocarcinoma, 85 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 26 undifferentiated carcinoma. Patients were older (62 years) men (80%) with normal body mass index (51%), little weight loss (1.8 kg), 0-2 ECOG performance status (83%), and a history of smoking (70%). Cancers were pT1 (24%), pT2 (15%), pT3 (50%), pN0 (52%), pM0 (93%), and pG2-G3 (78%); most involved distal esophagus (71%). Non-risk-adjusted survival for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was monotonic and distinctive across pTNM. Survival was more distinctive for adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma when pT was ordered by pN. Survival for pTis-1 adenocarcinoma was better than for squamous cell carcinoma, although monotonic and distinctive for both. WECC pathologic staging data is improved over that of the 7th edition, with more patients studied and patient and cancer variables collected. These data will be the basis for the 8th edition cancer staging manuals following risk adjustment for patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics, and should direct 9th edition data collection. However, the role of pure pathologic staging as the principal point of reference for esophageal cancer staging is waning.
© 2016 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer staging; decision-making; esophagectomy; prognostication; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27731547      PMCID: PMC5731491          DOI: 10.1111/dote.12520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment?

Authors:  M S Lauer; E H Blackstone; J B Young; E J Topol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: clinical staging data.

Authors:  T W Rice; C Apperson-Hansen; L M DiPaola; M E Semple; T E M R Lerut; M B Orringer; L-Q Chen; W L Hofstetter; B M Smithers; V W Rusch; B P L Wijnhoven; K N Chen; A R Davies; X B D'Journo; K A Kesler; J D Luketich; M K Ferguson; J V Räsänen; R van Hillegersberg; W Fang; L Durand; W H Allum; I Cecconello; R J Cerfolio; M Pera; S M Griffin; R Burger; J-F Liu; M S Allen; S Law; T J Watson; G E Darling; W J Scott; A Duranceau; C E Denlinger; P H Schipper; H Ishwaran; E H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Valerie W Rusch; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Disease-specific mortality may underestimate the total effect of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Pim J van Leeuwen; Ries Kranse; Timo Hakulinen; Monique J Roobol; Harry J de Koning; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.

Authors:  William C Black; David A Haggstrom; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration.

Authors:  T W Rice; V W Rusch; C Apperson-Hansen; M S Allen; L-Q Chen; J G Hunter; K A Kesler; S Law; T E M R Lerut; C E Reed; J A Salo; W J Scott; S G Swisher; T J Watson; E H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.429

  6 in total
  22 in total

1.  8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Deepa T Patil; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

2.  Precision Surgical Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Min Lu; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Signet Ring Cell Features are Associated with Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment and Dismal Survival in Patients with High-Grade Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Solomon; Muhammad Abbas; Yael Feferman; Riad Haddad; Gali Perl; Yulia Kundel; Sara Morgenstern; Nikolai Menasherov; Hanoch Kashtan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Hemant Ishwaran; Mark K Ferguson; Eugene H Blackstone; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.

Authors:  T W Rice; H Ishwaran; W L Hofstetter; D P Kelsen; C Apperson-Hansen; E H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.429

6.  Recommendations for neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Hemant Ishwaran; David P Kelsen; Wayne L Hofstetter; Carolyn Apperson-Hansen; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  The MR radiomic signature can predict preoperative lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jinrong Qu; Chen Shen; Jianjun Qin; Zhaoqi Wang; Zhenyu Liu; Jia Guo; Hongkai Zhang; Pengrui Gao; Tianxia Bei; Yingshu Wang; Hui Liu; Ihab R Kamel; Jie Tian; Hailiang Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Clinical Utility of ypTNM Stage Grouping in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Natsuru Sudo; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Yusuke Muneoka; Takaaki Hanyu; Yosuke Kano; Takashi Ishikawa; Yuki Hirose; Kohei Miura; Yoshifumi Shimada; Masayuki Nagahashi; Jun Sakata; Takashi Kobayashi; Takeo Bamba; Satoru Nakagawa; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Clinical implication of the innovations of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for esophageal and esophago-gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Benoit D'Journo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Incidence of Esophageal Cancer in Iran, a Population-Based Study: 2001-2015.

Authors:  Rahmatollah Moradzadeh; Parvaneh Golmohammadi; Bahman Ghaitasi; Haidar Nadrian; Athareh Najafi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.