Erin B Fennern1,2, Farhood Farjah3, Judy Y Chen1, Francys C Verdial1, Sara B Cook1, Erika M Wolff1, Saurabh Khandelwal1. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356310, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356310, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. ffarjah@uw.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Roughly 80% of VTEs occur post-discharge. The frequency of post-discharge heparin (PDH) prophylaxis use is unknown, and evidence about benefits and risks is limited. We aimed to determine the rate of use of PDH prophylaxis and evaluate its relationship with VTE and bleeding events. METHODS: Using the Truven Health MarketScan® database, we performed a retrospective cohort study (2007-2015) of adult patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass. We determined PDH prophylaxis from outpatient pharmacy claims, and post-discharge 90-day VTE and bleeding events from outpatient and inpatient claims. We used propensity score-adjusted regression models to mitigate confounding bias. RESULTS: Among 43,493 patients (median age 45 years; 78% women; 77% laparoscopic gastric bypass, 17% laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 6% open gastric bypass), 6% received PDH prophylaxis. Overall, 224 patients (0.52%) experienced VTEs, and 806 patients (1.85%) experienced bleeding. The unadjusted VTE rate did not differ between patients who did and did not receive PDH prophylaxis (0.39% vs. 0.52%, respectively; p = 0.347). The unadjusted bleeding rate was higher for the PDH prophylaxis group (2.74% vs. 1.80%, p < 0.001). In our adjusted analysis, a 23% lower risk of VTE in the PDH prophylaxis group was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 1.46), whereas the 47% higher risk of bleeding was statistically significant (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.88). CONCLUSIONS: PDH prophylaxis after bariatric surgery is uncommon. In our analysis, use was not associated with a lower VTE risk but was associated with a higher bleeding risk.
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Roughly 80% of VTEs occur post-discharge. The frequency of post-discharge heparin (PDH) prophylaxis use is unknown, and evidence about benefits and risks is limited. We aimed to determine the rate of use of PDH prophylaxis and evaluate its relationship with VTE and bleeding events. METHODS: Using the Truven Health MarketScan® database, we performed a retrospective cohort study (2007-2015) of adult patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass. We determined PDH prophylaxis from outpatient pharmacy claims, and post-discharge 90-day VTE and bleeding events from outpatient and inpatient claims. We used propensity score-adjusted regression models to mitigate confounding bias. RESULTS: Among 43,493 patients (median age 45 years; 78% women; 77% laparoscopic gastric bypass, 17% laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 6% open gastric bypass), 6% received PDH prophylaxis. Overall, 224 patients (0.52%) experienced VTEs, and 806 patients (1.85%) experienced bleeding. The unadjusted VTE rate did not differ between patients who did and did not receive PDH prophylaxis (0.39% vs. 0.52%, respectively; p = 0.347). The unadjusted bleeding rate was higher for the PDH prophylaxis group (2.74% vs. 1.80%, p < 0.001). In our adjusted analysis, a 23% lower risk of VTE in the PDH prophylaxis group was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 1.46), whereas the 47% higher risk of bleeding was statistically significant (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.88). CONCLUSIONS: PDH prophylaxis after bariatric surgery is uncommon. In our analysis, use was not associated with a lower VTE risk but was associated with a higher bleeding risk.
Authors: Aliu Sanni; Sebastian Perez; Rachel Medbery; Hernan D Urrego; Craig McCready; Juan P Toro; Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jérémie Thereaux; Thomas Lesuffleur; Sébastien Czernichow; Arnaud Basdevant; Simon Msika; David Nocca; Bertrand Millat; Anne Fagot-Campagna Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Anita P Courcoulas; Wendy C King; Steven H Belle; Paul Berk; David R Flum; Luis Garcia; William Gourash; Mary Horlick; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Jonathan Q Purnell; Ashima Singh; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Richard Thirlby; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Melissa M Garrido; Amy S Kelley; Julia Paris; Katherine Roza; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jonathan F Finks; Wayne J English; Arthur M Carlin; Kevin R Krause; David A Share; Mousumi Banerjee; John D Birkmeyer; Nancy J Birkmeyer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 12.969