Literature DB >> 33025088

Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.

Lee Reicher1,2, Anat Lavie3,4, Yuval Fouks3,4, Ofer Isakov4,5, Emmanuel Attali3,4, Yariv Yogev3,4, Sharon Maslovitz3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determining the efficacy of performance of a second external cephalic version (ECV) following successful first ECV with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation in reducing the rate of cesarean delivery (CD).
METHODS: Data were reviewed on healthy women with fetuses in breech presentation who underwent a first ECV after 36 weeks. Routine ultrasound study was performed at 39-week gestation, and a repeat ECV procedure was performed if the fetus had reverted to non-cephalic presentation. Obstetrical outcome measures were compared between women who underwent one successful ECV between 36- and 41-week gestation in which the fetus remained in cephalic presentation until labor and those who underwent a successful first ECV after which the fetus returned to breech and a second ECV was performed. The primary outcome was the rate of secondary CD during vaginal delivery in cephalic presentation; rate of successful second ECV was the secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Overall 250 women underwent one ECV attempt of which 169 (67%) were successful. Of them 28 reverted to breech presentation, all women underwent two attempts of which 21 (76%) were successful. A second successful ECV attempt was associated with a 33% incidence of a CD vs. 2.8% after one successful ECV in which the fetus remained in cephalic presentation.
CONCLUSION: A second ECV after a successful first ECV with subsequent spontaneous reversion to breech presentation can be expected to be successful in 76% of cases but lead to CD in 33% of cases. Our findings can be used to support patient counseling and decision-making before second ECV attempt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breech; Cesarean delivery; External cephalic version

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33025088     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05819-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  2 in total

1.  External cephalic version: predictors of success.

Authors:  G A Aisenbrey; V A Catanzarite; C Nelson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Births: Final Data for 2017.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; Patrick Drake
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2018-11
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Successful Vaginal Delivery after External Cephalic Version in a Woman with a Large Partial Uterine Septum.

Authors:  Kristen E Park; Nicole L Vestal; Michael S Awadalla; Sharon A Winer
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.