| Literature DB >> 33023252 |
Abdelfattah El Moussaoui1, Mohammed Bourhia2, Fatima Zahra Jawhari1, Hamza Mechchate1, Meryem Slighoua1, Ahmed Bari3, Riaz Ullah4, Hafiz Majid Mahmood5, Syed Saeed Ali3, Samir Ibenmoussa2, Dalila Bousta1, Amina Bari1.
Abstract
Withania frutescens (W. frutescens) is a medicinal plant widely used to treat several diseases. This work aims to study phytochemical composition as well as acute and subacute toxicity of W. frutescens hydroethanolic extract in mice. The phytochemical composition of W. frutescens extract was performed using gas chromatographic analysis. Acute toxicity was studied in vivo with oral administration of single doses 400 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg, and 2000 mg/kg for 14 days. Subacute toxicity was studied with the administration of repeated doses of 400 mg/kg/day and 2000 mg/kg/day for 28 days. Phytochemical analysis of W. frutescens hydro-ethanolic extract confirmed the presence of interesting chemical compounds. Acute toxicity results showed no toxic symptoms in mice treated with an increasing dose up to a maximum of 2000 mg/kg. Alongside acute toxicity, subacute data showed no clinical symptoms nor biochemical or histological alteration in mice treated with an increasing dose up to a maximum of 2000 mg/kg compared to the control group (p < 0.05). This study shows no toxic effects in animals treated with W. frutescens extract, and, therefore, this plant can be considered safe in animals up to 2000 mg/kg under both acute and subacute toxicity conditions.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS; Withania frutescens; biochemical parameters; histopathology; toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33023252 PMCID: PMC7583005 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Gas chromatographic profile of W. frutescens extract.
Phytochemical compounds identified in the extract by gas chromatography.
| Peaks | R.T (min) | Name | Area % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.203 | 1,7,7-Trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol | 1.19 |
| 2 | 15.086 | Terpinenol-4 | 10.04 |
| 3 | 14.862 | 6,6-Dimethyl-2-methylenebicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-one | 2.67 |
| 4 | 14.151 | Bicyclo [3.1.1] heptan-3-ol, 6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene | 6.26 |
| 5 | 13.902 | 1-Isopropyl-4-methylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one | 1.24 |
| 6 | 13.593 | Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-one, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl) | 1.10 |
| 7 | 13.348 | 2,5,5-trimethylhepta-2,6-dien-4-ol | 1.84 |
| 8 | 13.284 | Cuproine | 2.34 |
| 9 | 13.063 | butanedioic acid,(trimethylsilyl oxy); bis (trimethylsilyl) | 1.33 |
| 10 | 12.978 | Malic acid, o-trimethylsilyl), bis (trimethylsilyl) ester | 2.77 |
| 11 | 12.930 | 2,2′-biquinoline | 3.00 |
| 12 | 12.685 | 3-oxovaleric acid | 0.65 |
| 13 | 12.529 | Hexadecanoic acid | 1.17 |
| 14 | 11.874 | Palmitic acid | 1.00 |
| 15 | 11.115 | cyclopentadieneacrylic acid | 0.68 |
| 16 | 10.927 | Ferrocene (2-carboxyethenyl) | 0.75 |
| 17 | 10.786 | 4H-1-benzopyran-4-one,2,3-dihydro-5,7-dihydroxy-2phenyl(S) | 8.76 |
| 18 | 9.702 | Pyrido (3,2-d) pyrimidine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione,1,3,6,trimethyl | 3.66 |
| 19 | 9.590 | Trimethylsilyl ether of glycerol | 0.86 |
| 20 | 9.377 | 2-cyanophenazine | 7.67 |
| 21 | 9.100 | 2-phenazine carbonitrile | 10.64 |
| 22 | 8.614 | Cyclopentan ecarboxylic acid, 3-methyl-2-oxo, ethyl ester | 0.83 |
| 23 | 8.570 | m-phenylphenol | 1.04 |
| 24 | 8.397 | Tetramethylethylene-1,4-diol 2Tms | 7.58 |
| 25 | 7.851 | 3-biphenylol | 2.92 |
| 26 | 7.486 | 1-Naphtalenethiol | 0.72 |
| 27 | 5.120 | Pyradiazine,3-chloro-6-(methylthio) | 1.72 |
| 28 | 4.952 | Chromium, pentacarbonyl | 13.22 |
| 29 | 4.671 | 3H-pyrazol-3-one, 2-4-dihydro-5-phenyl | 2.29 |
Figure 2Effect of treatment with W. frutescens extract on body weight evolution of animals.
Figure 3Effect of treatment with W. frutescens extract on body weight evolution of animals.
Figure 4Effect of treatment with W. frutescens extract on relative organ weights.
Figure 5Effect of W. frutescens extract on animal biochemical parameters (A): Urea, (B): Creatinine, (C): ASAT, (D): ALAT. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5.
Figure 6Photomicrographs of liver slices of animals treated W. frutescens (magnification ×40).
Figure 7Microscopic photo of spleens of animals treated W. frutescens (magnification ×40).
Figure 8Kidney histology of animals treated with 400 mg/kg, 2000 mg/kg (magnification ×40).