BACKGROUND AND AIM: Muscularis macrophages (MMs) not only mediate the innate immunity, but also functionally interact with cells important for gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to determine the spatial relationship and types of contacts between the MMs and neighboring cells in the muscularis propria of human and mouse stomach, small intestine, and large intestine. METHODS: The distribution and morphology of MMs and their contacts with other cells were investigated by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. KEY RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed variable shape and number of MMs according to their location in different portions of the muscle coat. By double labeling, a close association between MMs and neighboring cells, that is, neurons, smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), telocytes (TCs)/PDGFRα-positive cells, was seen. Electron microscopy demonstrated that in the muscle layers of both animal species, MMs have similar ultrastructural features and have specialized cell-to-cell contacts with smooth muscle cells and TCs/PDGFRα-positive cells but not with ICCs and enteric neurons. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This study describes varying patterns of distribution of MMs between different regions of the gut, and reports the presence of distinct and extended cell-to-cell contacts between MMs and smooth muscle cells and between MMs and TCs/PDGFRα-positive cells. In contrast, MMs, although close to ICCs and nerve elements, did not make contact with them. These findings indicate specialized and variable roles for MMs in the modulation of gastrointestinal motility whose significance should be more closely investigated in normal and pathological conditions.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Muscularis macrophages (MMs) not only mediate the innate immunity, but also functionally interact with cells important for gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to determine the spatial relationship and types of contacts between the MMs and neighboring cells in the muscularis propria of human and mouse stomach, small intestine, and large intestine. METHODS: The distribution and morphology of MMs and their contacts with other cells were investigated by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. KEY RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed variable shape and number of MMs according to their location in different portions of the muscle coat. By double labeling, a close association between MMs and neighboring cells, that is, neurons, smooth muscle cells, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), telocytes (TCs)/PDGFRα-positive cells, was seen. Electron microscopy demonstrated that in the muscle layers of both animal species, MMs have similar ultrastructural features and have specialized cell-to-cell contacts with smooth muscle cells and TCs/PDGFRα-positive cells but not with ICCs and enteric neurons. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This study describes varying patterns of distribution of MMs between different regions of the gut, and reports the presence of distinct and extended cell-to-cell contacts between MMs and smooth muscle cells and between MMs and TCs/PDGFRα-positive cells. In contrast, MMs, although close to ICCs and nerve elements, did not make contact with them. These findings indicate specialized and variable roles for MMs in the modulation of gastrointestinal motility whose significance should be more closely investigated in normal and pathological conditions.
Authors: Frances Y McWhorter; Tingting Wang; Phoebe Nguyen; Thanh Chung; Wendy F Liu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Paul Andrew Muller; Balázs Koscsó; Gaurav Manohar Rajani; Korey Stevanovic; Marie-Luise Berres; Daigo Hashimoto; Arthur Mortha; Marylene Leboeuf; Xiu-Min Li; Daniel Mucida; E Richard Stanley; Stephanie Dahan; Kara Gross Margolis; Michael David Gershon; Miriam Merad; Milena Bogunovic Journal: Cell Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jean-Marie Vanderwinden; Jüri J Rumessen; Alban de Kerchove d'Exaerde; Karine Gillard; Jean-Jacques Panthier; Marc-Henri de Laet; Serge N Schiffmann Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2002-10-23 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: J H Pierce; E Di Marco; G W Cox; D Lombardi; M Ruggiero; L Varesio; L M Wang; G G Choudhury; A Y Sakaguchi; P P Di Fiore Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1990-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Caroline A Cobine; Grant W Hennig; Masaaki Kurahashi; Kenton M Sanders; Sean M Ward; Kathleen D Keef Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Ilana Gabanyi; Paul A Muller; Linda Feighery; Thiago Y Oliveira; Frederico A Costa-Pinto; Daniel Mucida Journal: Cell Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Sofia T Rosenbaum; Julie Svalø; Karsten Nielsen; Torben Larsen; Jørgen C Jørgensen; Pierre Bouchelouche Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 5.310