| Literature DB >> 33019943 |
Jun Yang1, Megan Griffiths2, Melanie K Nies2, Stephanie Brandal2, Rachel Damico3, Dhananjay Vaidya4,5, Xueting Tao6, Catherine E Simpson3, Todd M Kolb3, Stephen C Mathai3, Michael W Pauciulo7, William C Nichols7, David D Ivy8, Eric D Austin9, Paul M Hassoun3, Allen D Everett2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a fatal disease that results from cardio-pulmonary dysfunction with the pathology largely unknown. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) is an important member of the insulin-like growth factor family, with evidence suggesting elevation in PAH patients. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum IGFBP2 in PAH to determine if it could discriminate PAH from healthy controls and if it was associated with disease severity and survival.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33019943 PMCID: PMC7537100 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01734-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Demographics and characteristics of all study cohorts
| JHPH cohort | PAHB cohort | Control cohort | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127 | 203 | 128 | |||
| Age (years) | 62 (50–69) | 56 (44–67) | 43 (33–57) | ||
| Female ( | 107 (84%) | 158 (78%) | 96 (75%) | ||
| Race—EA, AA, other | 95/20/12 (75%/16%/9%) | 168/26/8 (83%/13%/4%) | 105/15/8 (82%/12%/8%) | ||
| Co-morbidities (asthma /HTN/diabetes/thyroid) | 6/20/3/6 | ||||
| IPAH/APAH/other, | 46/81/0 (36%/64%/0%) | 85/98/20 (42%/48%/10%) | |||
| APAH-CTD | 81 (64%) | 71 (35%) | |||
| APAH-PoPH | 11 (5%) | ||||
| APAH-CHD | 3 (1.5%) | ||||
| 6MWD (m) | 376 | 297–454 | 302 | 183–401 | |
| NYHA-FC | |||||
| % | % | ||||
| I (13) | 10% | I (7) | 4% | ||
| II (53) | 42% | II (49) | 24% | ||
| III (60) | 47% | III (75) | 37% | ||
| IV (0) | 0% | IV (13) | 6% | ||
| No data (0) | 0% | No data (59) | 29% | ||
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 779.5 | (249.5–2826.6) | 1253.5 | (369.9–3593.3) | |
| RAP (mmHg) | 7 (4–9) | 9 (6–14) | |||
| mPAP (mmHg) | 39 (29–50) | 48 (40–56) | |||
| PCWP (mmHg) | 10 (7–12) | 11 (8–13) | |||
| PVR (WU) | 6.4 (3.4–10.3) | 9.4 (6.8–13.9) | |||
| CO (L.min−1) | 4.4 (3.7–5.5) | 4 (3.2–4.9) | |||
| CI (L.min−1/m−2) | 2.5 (2.1–3.1) | 2.2 (1.7–2.8) | |||
Data expressed as median and IQR, number (n), percentage (%), or range as indicated
Abbreviations: EA European American, AA African American, HTN hypertension, thyroid thyroid disease, RAP right atrial pressure, mPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure, PCWP pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, WU Wood units, CO cardiac output, CI cardiac index, NYHA-FC New York Heart Associated-Functional Class, 6MWD 6-min walk distance, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, JHPH Johns Hopkins Pulmonary Hypertension, PAHB Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Biobank
Circulating IGF axis proteins levels
| JHPH, | PAHB, | Control, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD, | mean ± SD, | mean ± SD | |
| (median; range) | (median; range) | (median; range) | |
| 72.9 ± 30.4, | 89.6 ± 51.3, | 69.4 ± 34.4 | |
| (67.0; 24.3–222.8) | (79.1; 21.6–486.6) | (64.7; 18.3–199.6) | |
| 374.5 ± 121.9, | 400.3 ± 182.8, | 385.0 ± 171.6 | |
| (347.8; 56.1–908.1) | (391.6; 55.4–963.4) | (340.9; 56.6–994.5) | |
| 419.8 ± 307.4, | 621.2 ± 425.9, | 207.3 ± 180.5 | |
| (350.9; 55.5–1869) | (474.6; 103.6–2144) | (170.2; 55.6–1806) |
p value was calculated by Mann-Whitney test between the values from PAH and control cohorts
Fig. 1Box and whisker plot of serum IGFBP2 levels in subgroups of APAH (N = 81) and IPAH (N = 46) in JHPH cohort (a) versus healthy control (N = 128). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR 5–95%) and horizontal lines are the median. Outliers are indicated with solid dots. b The subgroups of APAH (N = 98), IPAH (N = 85), and FAPH (N = 20) in the PAHB cohort in the same style
Fig. 2Comparison of receiver operating curves (ROC) for IGF1, IGF2, and IGFBP2as predictors of pulmonary arterial hypertension for 127 subjects from the JHPH cohort and 128 healthy control subjects. The AUC for IGFBP2 is 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.698–0.808, p < 0.0001; AUC for IGF1 is 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.455–0.583, p = 0.61; and AUC for IGF2 is 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.438–0.566, p = 0.96
Associations (unadjusted) between IGFBP2 and clinical variables
| | ||||
| | ||||
| | ||||
| | -0.1 | 0.265 | -0.111 | 0.116 |
| | -0.033 | 0.769 | -0.043 | 0.552 |
| | 0.123 | 0.171 | 0.062 | 0.387 |
| | 0.112 | 0.212 | -0.036 | 0.609 |
| | 0.036 | 0.685 | 0.124 | 0.082 |
| | 0.035 | 0.696 | -0.113 | 0.111 |
| | 0.13 | 0.307 | ||
| | ||||
| | ||||
Associations (adjusted for age and sex) between IGFBP2 and clinical variables
| JHPH | PAHB | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | Coefficient | |||
| | − 0.144 | 0.058 | ||
| | ||||
| | − 0.292 | 0.554 | − 0.224 | 0.236 |
| | 1.284 | 0.605 | − 0.039 | 0.722 |
| | 2.811 | 0.07 | 1.175 | 0.062 |
| | 0.913 | 0.529 | ||
| | 1.251 | 0.33 | 1.289 | 0.056 |
| | 0.207 | 0.835 | ||
| | 0.783 | 0.22 | 0.436 | 0.135 |
| | 1.166 | 0.099 | ||
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier survival curve for IGFBP2 in the JHPH cohort. The curves represent survival analysis of JHPH cohort dichotomized by median serum IGFBP2 (n = 125, p = 0.0001) concentration
Fig. 4Kaplan-Meier survival curve for IGFBP2 in the PAHB cohort. The curves represent survival analysis of PAH cohort dichotomized by median serum IGFBP2 (n = 200, p < 0.0001) concentration
Fig. 5IGFBP2 protein levels in the lung tissues measured by western blot using IGFBP2 specific antibody or actinin level as a loading control (a). C1–C4 are control donor lung samples, and P1–P4 are lung samples from PAH patients. Box and whisker plot of IGFBP2 protein levels in lung samples from PAH patients versus from controls (b). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR 5–95%) and horizontal lines are the median. The IGFBP2 protein level in each sample (bands in a) was quantified using ImageJ software
Fig. 6Box and whisker plot of IGFBP2 mRNA levels in PAEC (N = 10) versus that in PASMC (N = 13). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR 5–95%) and horizontal lines are the median
Fig. 7Box and whisker plot of IGFBP2 protein levels in conditional medias from PAEC (N = 14) versus that in PASMC (N = 22); IGFBP2 level was normalized by cultured cell protein concentration. Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR 5–95%) and horizontal lines are the median