Literature DB >> 33017465

Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Versus Without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Ching-Jen Chen1, Dale Ding2, Cheng-Chia Lee3,4, Kathryn N Kearns1, I Jonathan Pomeraniec1, Christopher P Cifarelli5, David E Arsanious5, Roman Liscak6, Jaromir Hanuska6, Brian J Williams2, Mehran B Yusuf7, Shiao Y Woo7, Natasha Ironside1, Ronald E Warnick8, Daniel M Trifiletti9, David Mathieu10, Monica Mureb11, Carolina Benjamin11, Douglas Kondziolka11, Caleb E Feliciano12, Rafael Rodriguez-Mercado12, Kevin M Cockroft13, Scott Simon13, Heath B Mackley14, Samer Zammar13, Neel T Patel13, Varun Padmanaban13, Nathan Beatson15, Anissa Saylany15, John Lee15, Jason P Sheehan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior comparisons of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without embolization were inherently flawed, due to differences in the pretreatment nidus volumes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of embolization and SRS, vs SRS alone for AVMs using pre-embolization malformation features.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Patients were categorized into the embolization and SRS (E + SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was defined as AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiologic and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC), and cyst formation.
RESULTS: The matched cohorts each comprised 101 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (48.5% vs 54.5%; odds ratio = 0.788, P = .399). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were also similar between the E + SRS (33.0%, 46.4%, 56.2%, and 60.8%, respectively) and SRS-only (32.9%, 46.2%, 56.0%, and 60.6%, respectively) cohorts (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 1.005, P = .981). Cumulative probabilities of radiologic RIC at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were lower in the E + SRS (25.0%, 25.7%, 26.7%, and 26.7%, respectively) vs SRS-only (45.3%, 46.2%, 47.8%, and 47.8%, respectively) cohort (SHR = 0.478, P = .004). Symptomatic and asymptomatic embolization-related complication rates were 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, symptomatic RIC, and cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts.
CONCLUSION: This study refutes the prevalent notion that AVM embolization negatively affects the likelihood of obliteration after SRS.
Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteriovenous malformation; Embolization; Endovascular; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33017465     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  3 in total

1.  Dosimetric effects of embolization material artefacts in arteriovenous malformations stereotactic radiosurgery on treatment planning calculation.

Authors:  Abousaleh Elawadi; Mukhtar Alshanqity; Hussain AlHussain; Reham Mohamed; Yasser Orz; Sultan Alqahtani; Sayel Melheim
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 2.  Untangling the Modern Treatment Paradigm for Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Brent C Morel; Blake Wittenberg; Jessa E Hoffman; David E Case; Zach Folzenlogen; Christopher Roark; Joshua Seinfeld
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Embolization before Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations does not negatively impact its obliteration rate: a series of 190 patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Yahia-Cherif; Chifra Fenton; Thomas Bonnet; Olivier De Witte; Stéphane Simon; Viviane De Maertelaer; Benjamin Mine; Florence Lefranc; Boris Lubicz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.995

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.