Literature DB >> 33013148

Does Large-Scale Neighborhood Reinvestment Work? Effects of Public-Private Real Estate Investment on Local Sales Prices, Rental Prices, and Crime Rates.

Matthew Baird1, Heather Schwartz2, Gerald Hunter1, Tiffany L Gary-Webb3, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar1, Tamara Dubowitz1, Wendy Troxel1.   

Abstract

During the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded more than $6 billion in competitive grants called HOPE VI to spur neighborhood redevelopment. We add to HOPE VI research by examining the impacts of a large set of public-private real estate investments, including HOPE VI, made over a 16-year period in a distressed Pittsburgh neighborhood called the Hill District. Specifically, we estimate the effects of the $468 million additional public-private investments that Hill District received compared to a demographically similar neighborhood on sale prices, rental prices, and crime. We find large and statistically significant impacts of the public-private investments on residential sales prices, commercial sales prices, and on rental prices, but only a marginally significant yet meaningful decline in non-violent arrests. For each additional $10 million of public-private investment, we find a 0.95 percent increase in residential sales prices, 2.7 percent increase in commercial sales prices, and 0.55 percent increase in rental prices. Because there was an accumulated difference over 16 years of $468 million in the amount of public-private investment across the two neighborhoods we examine, these percentage increases amount to large changes in real estate prices over that time. Commercial real estate investors and homeowners benefited the most, followed by residential landlords. Our analyses imply cities should anticipate the potential impacts of major neighborhood investment on low-income households, especially unsubsidized renters that most directly experience the brunt of rising rents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HOPE VI; community development; public housing; real estate

Year:  2019        PMID: 33013148      PMCID: PMC7531196          DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2019.1655468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hous Policy Debate        ISSN: 1051-1482


  2 in total

1.  Healthy food access for urban food desert residents: examination of the food environment, food purchasing practices, diet and BMI.

Authors:  Tamara Dubowitz; Shannon N Zenk; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Deborah A Cohen; Robin Beckman; Gerald Hunter; Elizabeth D Steiner; Rebecca L Collins
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Diet And Perceptions Change With Supermarket Introduction In A Food Desert, But Not Because Of Supermarket Use.

Authors:  Tamara Dubowitz; Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar; Deborah A Cohen; Robin Beckman; Elizabeth D Steiner; Gerald P Hunter; Karen R Flórez; Christina Huang; Christine A Vaughan; Jennifer C Sloan; Shannon N Zenk; Steven Cummins; Rebecca L Collins
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.301

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Improvements in Neighborhood Socioeconomic Conditions May Improve Resident Diet.

Authors:  Andrea S Richardson; Rebecca L Collins; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Feifei Ye; Gerald P Hunter; Matthew D Baird; Heather Schwartz; Jennifer C Sloan; Alvin Nugroho; Robin Beckman; Wendy M Troxel; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Tamara Dubowitz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Does investing in low-income urban neighborhoods improve sleep?

Authors:  Tamara Dubowitz; Ann Haas; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Rebecca L Collins; Robin Beckman; Stephanie Brooks Holliday; Andrea S Richardson; Lauren Hale; Daniel J Buysse; Matthew P Buman; Wendy M Troxel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.

Authors:  Felicia Hill-Briggs; Nancy E Adler; Seth A Berkowitz; Marshall H Chin; Tiffany L Gary-Webb; Ana Navas-Acien; Pamela L Thornton; Debra Haire-Joshu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 19.112

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.