Literature DB >> 33012174

Quantification of Aerosol Particle Concentrations During Endoscopic Sinonasal Surgery in the Operating Room.

Alex Murr1, Nicholas R Lenze1, William Colby Brown1, Mark W Gelpi1, Charles S Ebert1, Brent A Senior1, Brian D Thorp1, Adam M Zanation1, Adam J Kimple1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent indirect evidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during endoscopic endonasal procedures has highlighted the dearth of knowledge surrounding aerosol generation with these procedures. As we adapt to function in the era of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) a better understanding of how surgical techniques generate potentially infectious aerosolized particles will enhance the safety of operating room (OR) staff and learners.
OBJECTIVE: To provide greater understanding of possible SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk during endonasal surgeries by quantifying increases in airborne particle concentrations during endoscopic sinonasal surgery.
METHODS: Aerosol concentrations were measured during live-patient endoscopic endonasal surgeries in ORs with an optical particle sizer. Measurements were taken throughout the procedure at six time points: 1) before patient entered the OR, 2) before pre-incision timeout during OR setup, 3) during cold instrumentation with suction, 4) during microdebrider use, 5) during drill use and, 6) at the end of the case prior to extubation. Measurements were taken at three different OR position: surgeon, circulating nurse, and anesthesia provider.
RESULTS: Significant increases in airborne particle concentration were measured at the surgeon position with both the microdebrider (p = 0.001) and drill (p = 0.001), but not for cold instrumentation with suction (p = 0.340). Particle concentration did not significantly increase at the anesthesia position or the circulator position with any form of instrumentation. Overall, the surgeon position had a mean increase in particle concentration of 2445 particles/ft3 (95% CI 881 to 3955; p = 0.001) during drill use and 1825 particles/ft3 (95% CI 641 to 3009; p = 0.001) during microdebrider use.
CONCLUSION: Drilling and microdebrider use during endonasal surgery in a standard operating room is associated with a significant increase in airborne particle concentrations. Fortunately, this increase in aerosol concentration is localized to the area of the operating surgeon, with no detectable increase in aerosol particles at other OR positions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; aerosolization; airborne particles; endoscopic sinus surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33012174      PMCID: PMC8822194          DOI: 10.1177/1945892420962335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  15 in total

1.  Airborne transmission of communicable infection--the elusive pathway.

Authors:  Chad J Roy; Donald K Milton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sourcing Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Edward Livingston; Angel Desai; Michael Berkwits
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Promise and Peril of Antibody Testing for COVID-19.

Authors:  Jennifer Abbasi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Alan D Workman; D Bradley Welling; Bob S Carter; William T Curry; Eric H Holbrook; Stacey T Gray; George A Scangas; Benjamin S Bleier
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  In Reply: Precautions for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Wende Zhu; Hongyang Zhao; Xiaobing Jiang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China, January-March 2020: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shufa Zheng; Jian Fan; Fei Yu; Baihuan Feng; Bin Lou; Qianda Zou; Guoliang Xie; Sha Lin; Ruonan Wang; Xianzhi Yang; Weizhen Chen; Qi Wang; Dan Zhang; Yanchao Liu; Renjie Gong; Zhaohui Ma; Siming Lu; Yanyan Xiao; Yaxi Gu; Jinming Zhang; Hangping Yao; Kaijin Xu; Xiaoyang Lu; Guoqing Wei; Jianying Zhou; Qiang Fang; Hongliu Cai; Yunqing Qiu; Jifang Sheng; Yu Chen; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 7.  COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses.

Authors:  Muhammad Adnan Shereen; Suliman Khan; Abeer Kazmi; Nadia Bashir; Rabeea Siddique
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 8.  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Melissa Severn; Carmem L Pessoa-Silva; John Conly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Real-time RT-PCR in COVID-19 detection: issues affecting the results.

Authors:  Alireza Tahamtan; Abdollah Ardebili
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 10.  Aerosol-generating otolaryngology procedures and the need for enhanced PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review.

Authors:  Paul Mick; Russell Murphy
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Experimental study on the exposure level of surgical staff to SARS-CoV-2 in operating rooms with mixing ventilation under negative pressure.

Authors:  Yang Bi; Amar Aganovic; Hans Martin Mathisen; Guangyu Cao
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 7.093

2.  Follow-up of a national web-based survey on the SARS-CoV-2 infectious state of otorhinolaryngologists in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Achim G Beule; Jan-Christoffer Lüers; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Leigh J Sowerby; Vasyl Bogdanov; Daniel Grafmans
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in-office procedures.

Authors:  Dhruv Sharma; Vincent J Campiti; Michael J Ye; Kolin E Rubel; Thomas S Higgins; Arthur W Wu; Taha Z Shipchandler; Sarah J Burgin; Michael W Sim; Elisa A Illing; Jae Hong Park; Jonathan Y Ting
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-14

Review 4.  [The first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic-impact on otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  M Herzog; A G Beule; J-C Lüers; O Guntinas-Lichius; D Grafmans; T Deitmer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.330

5.  Aerosol-scavenging isolation barrier mitigates exposure risk during endonasal procedures in coronavirus-2019.

Authors:  Alan D Workman; Benjamin S Bleier; Tofigh Sayahi; Kerry E Kelly; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.426

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.