Jules Chyten-Brennan1, Viraj V Patel2, Mindy S Ginsberg3, David B Hanna3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. Electronic address: jules.chyten-brennan@hhs.sccgov.org. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: HIV research among transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) people is limited by lack of gender identity data collection. We designed an EHR-based algorithm to identify TGNB people among people living with HIV (PLWH) when gender identity was not systematically collected. METHODS: We applied EHR-based search criteria to all PLWH receiving care at a large urban health system between 1997 and 2017, then confirmed gender identity by chart review. We compared patient characteristics by gender identity and screening criteria, then calculated positive predictive values for each criterion. RESULTS: Among 18,086 PLWH, 213 (1.2%) met criteria as potential TGNB patients and 178/213 were confirmed. Positive predictive values were highest for free-text keywords (91.7%) and diagnosis codes (77.4%). Confirmed TGNB patients were younger (median 32.5 vs. 42.5 years, P < .001) and less likely to be Hispanic (37.1% vs. 62.9%, P = .03) than unconfirmed patients. Among confirmed patients, 15% met criteria only for prospective gender identity data collection and were significantly older. CONCLUSION: EHR-based criteria can identify TGNB PLWH, but success may differ by ethnicity and age. Retrospective versus intentional, prospective gender identity data collection may capture different patients. To reduce misclassification in epidemiologic studies, gender identity data collection should address these potential differences and be systematic and prospective.
PURPOSE: HIV research among transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) people is limited by lack of gender identity data collection. We designed an EHR-based algorithm to identify TGNB people among people living with HIV (PLWH) when gender identity was not systematically collected. METHODS: We applied EHR-based search criteria to all PLWH receiving care at a large urban health system between 1997 and 2017, then confirmed gender identity by chart review. We compared patient characteristics by gender identity and screening criteria, then calculated positive predictive values for each criterion. RESULTS: Among 18,086 PLWH, 213 (1.2%) met criteria as potential TGNB patients and 178/213 were confirmed. Positive predictive values were highest for free-text keywords (91.7%) and diagnosis codes (77.4%). Confirmed TGNB patients were younger (median 32.5 vs. 42.5 years, P < .001) and less likely to be Hispanic (37.1% vs. 62.9%, P = .03) than unconfirmed patients. Among confirmed patients, 15% met criteria only for prospective gender identity data collection and were significantly older. CONCLUSION: EHR-based criteria can identify TGNB PLWH, but success may differ by ethnicity and age. Retrospective versus intentional, prospective gender identity data collection may capture different patients. To reduce misclassification in epidemiologic studies, gender identity data collection should address these potential differences and be systematic and prospective.
Authors: Douglas Roblin; Joshua Barzilay; Dennis Tolsma; Brandi Robinson; Laura Schild; Lee Cromwell; Hayley Braun; Rebecca Nash; Joseph Gerth; Enid Hunkeler; Virginia P Quinn; Vin Tangpricha; Michael Goodman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Douglas S Krakower; Susan Gruber; Katherine Hsu; John T Menchaca; Judith C Maro; Benjamin A Kruskal; Ira B Wilson; Kenneth H Mayer; Michael Klompas Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: John R Blosnich; John Cashy; Adam J Gordon; Jillian C Shipherd; Michael R Kauth; George R Brown; Michael J Fine Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497