| Literature DB >> 33007979 |
Jing Fan1, Caicui Ding1, Weiyan Gong1, Fan Yuan1, Yanning Ma1, Ganyu Feng1, Chao Song1, Ailing Liu1.
Abstract
The prevalence of metabolic diseases has increased over the past few decades, and epidemiological studies suggest that metabolic diseases may be associated with lifestyle. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between leisure-time sedentary behaviors (LTSBs) and metabolic risks in middle-aged women in China. Data came from the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance (CNNHS) in 2010-2012. A total of 2643 women aged 46 to 53 years were involved. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the association of leisure-time sedentary duration (LTSD) with total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), waist circumference (WC), and body mass index (BMI). Restrictive cubic splines (RCS) were used to plot the curves between LTSD and the risk of metabolic diseases. Region, education, income, alcohol consumption, exercise, daily energy intake, and fat energy ratio were adjusted for all models. After adjusting for potential influencing factors, the results of multiple linear regression showed that for each additional hour increase in LTSD, TC and TG increased by 0.03 mmol/L and 0.04 mmol/L, respectively. The results of RCS curves showed that the risks of MetS (p for trend = 0.0276), obesity (p for trend = 0.0369), hypertension (p for trend = 0.0062), and hypercholesteremia (p for trend = 0.0033) increased with the increase in LTSD. LTSB was associated with the risks of MetS, obesity, hypertension, and hypercholesteremia in middle-aged women. Reducing LTSD may be an effective way of preventing metabolic diseases in middle-aged women.Entities:
Keywords: metabolic diseases; sedentary behaviors; women’s health
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33007979 PMCID: PMC7594022 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Basic characteristics between middle-aged women with different leisure-time sedentary behavior (LTSB) levels.
| Variables | Low-Level LTSB (<2.0 h/day) | Middle-Level LTSB (2.0–3.0 h/day) | High-Level LTSB (≥3.0 h/day) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 463 (17.5%) | 962 (36.4%) | 1218 (46.1%) | |
| Residence (%) | ||||
| Urban | 47.5 | 45.5 | 57.2 | <0.0001 |
| Rural | 52.5 | 54.5 | 42.8 | |
| Education (%) | ||||
| Primary school and low | 46.4 | 37.9 | 30.9 | <0.0001 |
| Middle school | 33.7 | 36.5 | 37.7 | |
| High school and above | 19.9 | 25.6 | 31.4 | |
| Family income | ||||
| Low income | 50.8 | 46.9 | 44.6 | 0.184 |
| Middle income | 36.5 | 36.0 | 39.2 | |
| High income | 8.0 | 10.8 | 10.8 | |
| Unknown | 4.8 | 6.3 | 5.5 | |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 24.3 ± 13.3 | 24.6 ± 3.3 | 24.6 ± 3.6 | 0.097 |
| WC (cm) | 81.3 ± 9.0 | 81.5 ± 8.9 | 81.3 ± 9.3 | 0.203 |
| Leisure exercise (%) | 13.8 | 13.6 | 15.3 | 0.509 |
| Drinking (%) | 19.2 | 17.3 | 17.2 | 0.583 |
| Energy intake (kcal) | 1912.8 ± 737.6 | 1936.2 ± 743.2 | 1908.7 ± 818.8 | 0.485 |
| Fat energy ratio (%) | 26.6 ± 13.3 | 27.2 ± 12.8 | 27.7 ± 12.8 | 0.000 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.66 ± 0.93 | 4.72 ± 0.93 | 4.83 ± 0.96 | 0.007 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.38 ± 0.91 | 1.43 ± 0.99 | 1.49 ± 1.07 | 0.031 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.21 ± 0.34 | 1.22 ± 0.32 | 1.22 ± 0.33 | 0.264 |
| Hypercholesteremia (%) | 4.3 | 5.2 | 8.2 | 0.002 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia (%) | 11.0 | 12.6 | 13.1 | 0.528 |
| Low HDL-C level (%) | 29.2 | 25.0 | 25.9 | 0.230 |
| Diabetes (%) | 5.2 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 0.477 |
| Hypertension (%) | 20.7 | 25.9 | 25.9 | 0.068 |
| BMI status | <0.0001 | |||
| Underweight | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |
| Normal | 46.2 | 40.8 | 43.3 | |
| Overweight | 37.4 | 42.6 | 38.1 | |
| Obesity | 14.3 | 14.2 | 16.3 | |
| Central Obesity (%) | 55.3 | 55.9 | 55.7 | 0.975 |
| Metabolic syndrome (%) | 25.7 | 27.4 | 28.2 | 0.601 |
Note: BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Linear regression analysis of the relationship between leisure-time sedentary duration (LTSD) and TC, TG, HDL-C, WC, and BMI.
| Variables | Simple Linear Regression | Multiple Linear Regression 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β1 |
| β2 |
| |
| TC | 0.04 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.019 |
| TG | 0.03 | 0.030 | 0.04 | 0.015 |
| HDL-C | 0.00 | 0.534 | 0.00 | 0.336 |
| WC | 0.15 | 0.253 | 0.23 | 0.076 |
| BMI | 0.08 | 0.112 | 0.10 | 0.055 |
Note: β simple linear regression coefficient; : p value of simple linear regression; β multiple linear regression coefficient. : p value of multiple linear regression. 1 Region, education, income, alcohol consumption, exercise, daily energy intake, and fat energy ratio were adjusted for all multiple linear regression models.
Figure 1Restrictive cubic spline (RCS) curves for sedentary duration and (A) diabetes, (B) central obesity, (C) overweight, (D) obesity, (E) hypercholesterolemia, (F) hypertriglyceridemia, (G) low HDL-C level, (H) hypertension, and (I) metabolic syndrome (MetS). Region, education, income, alcohol consumption, exercise, daily energy intake, and fat energy ratio were adjusted for all RCS curves.
Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the restrictive cubic spline of MetS.
| LTSD | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.3 | 1.06 | (0.79–1.42) | 0.0276 |
| 2.3 | 1.12 | (0.72–1.75) | |
| 3.3 | 1.21 | (0.76–1.93) | |
| 4.3 | 1.32 | (0.85–2.06) | |
| 5.3 | 1.44 | (0.93–2.22) | |
| 6.3 | 1.56 | (1.00–2.44) | |
| 7.3 | 1.70 | (1.06–2.72) | |
| 8.3 | 1.85 | (1.10–3.10) | |
| 9.3 | 2.01 | (1.13–3.58) | |
| 10.3 | 2.19 | (1.15–4.16) | |
| 11.3 | 2.39 | (1.17–4.87) |
OR and 95% CI for the restrictive cubic spline of obesity.
| LTSD | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 1.10 | (0.83–1.47) | 0.0369 |
| 2.0 | 1.21 | (0.72–2.05) | |
| 3.0 | 1.33 | (0.73–2.42) | |
| 4.0 | 1.46 | (0.82–2.58) | |
| 5.0 | 1.59 | (0.91–2.76) | |
| 6.0 | 1.75 | (1.00–3.04) | |
| 7.0 | 1.90 | (1.07–3.39) | |
| 8.0 | 2.08 | (1.11–3.88) | |
| 9.0 | 2.27 | (1.15–4.51) | |
| 10.0 | 2.49 | (1.17–5.31) | |
| 11.0 | 2.72 | (1.17–6.31) |
OR and 95% CI for the restrictive cubic spline of hypertension.
| LTSD | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 1.54 | (1.00–2.38) | 0.0062 |
| 3.0 | 1.75 | (1.06–2.89) | |
| 4.0 | 1.85 | (1.14–2.99) | |
| 5.0 | 1.94 | (1.22–3.08) | |
| 6.0 | 2.03 | (1.27–3.24) | |
| 7.0 | 2.13 | (1.30–3.48) | |
| 8.0 | 2.23 | (1.31–3.80) | |
| 9.0 | 2.34 | (1.30–4.21) | |
| 10.0 | 2.45 | (1.28–4.71) | |
| 11.0 | 2.57 | (1.24–5.31) |
OR and 95% CI for the restrictive cubic spline of hypercholesteremia.
| LTSD | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 2.02 | (0.94–4.34) | 0.0033 |
| 2.7 | 2.64 | (1.00–6.96) | |
| 3.7 | 3.00 | (1.14–7.88) | |
| 4.7 | 3.31 | (1.31–8.32) | |
| 5.7 | 3.64 | (1.47–8.99) | |
| 6.7 | 4.01 | (1.62–9.97) | |
| 7.7 | 4.42 | (1.73–11.33) | |
| 8.7 | 4.87 | (1.80–13.17) | |
| 9.7 | 5.37 | (1.85–15.60) | |
| 10.7 | 5.92 | (1.87–18.77) |