AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We analysed a sample of Australian adults to determine the strength of associations of TV viewing and participation in physical activity with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: This population-based cross-sectional study included 6,241 adults aged > or =35 years who were free from diagnosed diabetes mellitus and self-reported ischaemic disease and were not taking lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria. Participants self-reported TV viewing time and physical activity time for the previous week. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio of having the metabolic syndrome was 2.07 (95% CI 1.49-2.88) in women and 1.48 (95% CI 0.95-2.31) in men who watched TV for >14 h per week compared with those who watched < or =7.0 h per week. Compared with those who were less active (<2.5 h per week), the odds ratio for the metabolic syndrome was 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.90) in men and 0.53 (95% CI 0.38-0.74) in women who were active (> or =2.5 h per week). Longer TV viewing (>14 h per week) was associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance, obesity and dyslipidaemia in both men and women. A total physical activity time of > or =2.5 h per week was associated with a reduced prevalence of both insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia in both sexes and reduced prevalence of both obesity and hypertension in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Increased TV viewing time was associated with an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, while physical activity was associated with a reduced prevalence. Population strategies addressing the metabolic syndrome should focus on reducing sedentary behaviours such as TV viewing, as well as increasing physical activity.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We analysed a sample of Australian adults to determine the strength of associations of TV viewing and participation in physical activity with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: This population-based cross-sectional study included 6,241 adults aged > or =35 years who were free from diagnosed diabetes mellitus and self-reported ischaemic disease and were not taking lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to the 1999 World Health Organization criteria. Participants self-reported TV viewing time and physical activity time for the previous week. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio of having the metabolic syndrome was 2.07 (95% CI 1.49-2.88) in women and 1.48 (95% CI 0.95-2.31) in men who watched TV for >14 h per week compared with those who watched < or =7.0 h per week. Compared with those who were less active (<2.5 h per week), the odds ratio for the metabolic syndrome was 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.90) in men and 0.53 (95% CI 0.38-0.74) in women who were active (> or =2.5 h per week). Longer TV viewing (>14 h per week) was associated with an increased risk of insulin resistance, obesity and dyslipidaemia in both men and women. A total physical activity time of > or =2.5 h per week was associated with a reduced prevalence of both insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia in both sexes and reduced prevalence of both obesity and hypertension in women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Increased TV viewing time was associated with an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, while physical activity was associated with a reduced prevalence. Population strategies addressing the metabolic syndrome should focus on reducing sedentary behaviours such as TV viewing, as well as increasing physical activity.
Authors: T T Fung; F B Hu; J Yu; N F Chu; D Spiegelman; G H Tofler; W C Willett; E B Rimm Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: P Ireland; D Jolley; G Giles; K O'Dea; J Powles; I Rutishauser; M L Wahlqvist; J Williams Journal: Asia Pac J Clin Nutr Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 1.662
Authors: David W Dunstan; Paul Z Zimmet; Timothy A Welborn; Maximilian P De Courten; Adrian J Cameron; Richard A Sicree; Terry Dwyer; Stephen Colagiuri; Damien Jolley; Matthew Knuiman; Robert Atkins; Jonathan E Shaw Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Henry E Wang; John Baddley; Russell L Griffin; Suzanne Judd; George Howard; John P Donnelly; Monika M Safford Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Damon L Swift; Carl J Lavie; Neil M Johannsen; Ross Arena; Conrad P Earnest; James H O'Keefe; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair; Timothy S Church Journal: Circ J Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Susan B Sisson; Sarah M Camhi; Timothy S Church; Corby K Martin; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Claude Bouchard; Conrad P Earnest; Steven R Smith; Robert L Newton; Tuomo Rankinen; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Veronica Y Womack; Hongyan Ning; Cora E Lewis; Eric B Loucks; Eli Puterman; Jared Reis; Juned Siddique; Barbara Sternfeld; Linda Van Horn; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2014-09