Literature DB >> 33006484

Modeling the Effect of Tylosin Phosphate on Macrolide-Resistant Enterococci in Feedlots and Reducing Resistance Transmission.

Gregory Sean Stapleton1, Casey L Cazer2, Yrjö T Gröhn2.   

Abstract

Tylosin phosphate (TYL) is administered to more than 50% of U.S. beef cattle to reduce the incidence of liver abscesses but may increase the risk of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin-resistant bacteria disseminating from the feedlot. Limited evidence has been collected to understand how TYL affects the proportion of resistant bacteria in cattle or the feedlot environment. We created a mathematical model to investigate the effects of TYL administration on Enterococcus dynamics and examined preharvest strategies to mitigate the impact of TYL administration on resistance. The model simulated the physiological pharmacokinetics of orally administered TYL and estimated the pharmacodynamic effects of TYL on populations of resistant and susceptible Enterococcus within the cattle large intestine, feedlot pen, water trough, and feed bunk. The model parameters' population distributions were based on the available literature; 1000 Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the likely distribution of outcomes. At the end of the simulated treatment period, the median estimated proportion of macrolide-resistant enterococci was only 1 percentage point higher within treated cattle compared with cattle not fed TYL, in part because the TYL concentrations in the large intestine were substantially lower than the enterococci minimum inhibitory concentrations. However, 25% of the simulated cattle had a >10 percentage point increase in the proportion of resistant enterococci associated with TYL administration, termed the TYL effect. The model predicts withdrawing TYL treatment and moving cattle to an antimicrobial-free terminal pen with a low prevalence of resistant environmental enterococci for as few as 6 days could reduce the TYL effect by up to 14 percentage points. Additional investigation of the importance of this subset of cattle to the overall risk of resistance transmission from feedlots will aid in the interpretation and implementation of resistance mitigation strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus; antimicrobial resistance; enterococci; feedlot cattle; mathematical modeling; tylosin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33006484      PMCID: PMC8020526          DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  58 in total

1.  Mathematical models for Enterococcus faecalis recovery after microwave water disinfection.

Authors:  Earl Benjamin; Aron Reznik; Ellis Benjamin; Saroj K Pramanik; Louise Sowers; Arthur L Williams
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  Veterinary antimicrobials in feedlot manure: dissipation during composting and effects on composting processes.

Authors:  Allan J Cessna; Francis J Larney; Sandra L Kuchta; Xiying Hao; Toby Entz; Edward Topp; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Physicochemical factors differentially affect the biomass and bacteriocin production by bovine Enterococcus mundtii CRL1656.

Authors:  M Carolina Espeche; M Silvina Juárez Tomás; Birgitt Wiese; Elena Bru; M E Fátima Nader-Macías
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Growth performance and shedding of some pathogenic bacteria in feedlot cattle treated with different growth-promoting agents.

Authors:  Brigitte Lefebvre; François Malouin; Gabriel Roy; Karine Giguère; Moussa S Diarra
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment.

Authors:  Timothy R Desmarais; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Carol J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Dissipation of Three Veterinary Antimicrobials in Beef Cattle Feedlot Manure Stockpiled over Winter.

Authors:  Srinivas Sura; Dani Degenhardt; Allan J Cessna; Francis J Larney; Andrew F Olson; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Aerobic degradation of tylosin in cattle, chicken, and swine excreta.

Authors:  Jerold Scott Teeter; Roger D Meyerhoff
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Models of antimicrobial pressure on intestinal bacteria of the treated host populations.

Authors:  V V Volkova; C L Cazer; Y T Gröhn
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Monte Carlo Simulations Suggest Current Chlortetracycline Drug-Residue Based Withdrawal Periods Would Not Control Antimicrobial Resistance Dissemination from Feedlot to Slaughterhouse.

Authors:  Casey L Cazer; Lucas Ducrot; Victoriya V Volkova; Yrjö T Gröhn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Evaluating targets for control of plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance in enteric commensals of beef cattle: a modelling approach.

Authors:  V V Volkova; Z Lu; C Lanzas; Y T Grohn
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.