Literature DB >> 33006066

Developing brief versions of the Moral Foundations Vignettes using a genetic algorithm-based approach.

Damien L Crone1, Joshua J Rhee2, Simon M Laham2.   

Abstract

The time-efficient assessment of moral values using systematically validated measures is a high priority in moral psychology research. However, few such options exist for researchers working with Moral Foundations Theory, one of the most popular theories in moral psychology. Across two samples totaling 1336 participants (756 Australian undergraduates and 580 American Mechanical Turk workers), we used a genetic algorithm-based (GA) approach to construct and validate abbreviated versions of the Moral Foundations Vignettes (MFV), a 90-item scale comprising vignettes of concrete violations of each of the six moral foundations. We constructed 36- and 18-item versions of the MFV, demonstrating close correspondence with the complete MFV, and adequate reliability, predictive validity, and factor-analytic goodness of fit for both abbreviated versions. Overall, the abbreviated scales achieve substantially reduced length with minimal loss of information, providing a useful resource for moral psychology researchers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moral judgment; Moral psychology; Scale abbreviation; Scale validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33006066     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01489-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  Manifest variable path analysis: potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error.

Authors:  David A Cole; Kristopher J Preacher
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2013-09-30

2.  Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory.

Authors:  Scott Clifford; Vijeth Iyengar; Roberto Cabeza; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-12

3.  Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.

Authors:  Fieke M A Wagemans; Mark J Brandt; Marcel Zeelenberg
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Mapping the moral domain.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Haidt; Ravi Iyer; Spassena Koleva; Peter H Ditto
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-08

5.  The Abbreviation of Personality, or how to Measure 200 Personality Scales with 200 Items.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-04-01

6.  Deontological morality can be experimentally enhanced by increasing disgust: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Cristina Ottaviani; Francesco Mancini; Samantha Provenzano; Alberto Collazzoni; Francesca D'Olimpio
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Meta-Heuristics in Short Scale Construction: Ant Colony Optimization and Genetic Algorithm.

Authors:  Ulrich Schroeders; Oliver Wilhelm; Gabriel Olaru
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes.

Authors:  Damien L Crone; Stefan Bode; Carsten Murawski; Simon M Laham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Understanding libertarian morality: the psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians.

Authors:  Ravi Iyer; Spassena Koleva; Jesse Graham; Peter Ditto; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.

Authors:  Jacob Westfall; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.