| Literature DB >> 25582811 |
Scott Clifford1, Vijeth Iyengar2, Roberto Cabeza2, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong3.
Abstract
Research on the emotional, cognitive, and social determinants of moral judgment has surged in recent years. The development of moral foundations theory (MFT) has played an important role, demonstrating the breadth of morality. Moral psychology has responded by investigating how different domains of moral judgment are shaped by a variety of psychological factors. Yet, the discipline lacks a validated set of moral violations that span the moral domain, creating a barrier to investigating influences on judgment and how their neural bases might vary across the moral domain. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by developing and validating a large set of moral foundations vignettes (MFVs). Each vignette depicts a behavior violating a particular moral foundation and not others. The vignettes are controlled on many dimensions including syntactic structure and complexity making them suitable for neuroimaging research. We demonstrate the validity of our vignettes by examining respondents' classifications of moral violations, conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and demonstrating the correspondence between the extracted factors and existing measures of the moral foundations. We expect that the MFVs will be beneficial for a wide variety of behavioral and neuroimaging investigations of moral cognition.Entities:
Keywords: Intuition; Moral foundations theory; Moral judgment; Vignettes; Violations
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25582811 PMCID: PMC4780680 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Res Methods ISSN: 1554-351X