| Literature DB >> 33005687 |
Soheila Manifar1, Arezoo Rahimzamani2, Mohammad Shirkhoda3, Mohammad Nikkhah Ghamsari4, Mahin Bakhshi2.
Abstract
The antioxidant properties of uric acid may have a protective effect against the formation of oxygen radicals and subsequently against carcinogenicity. The present study aimed at evaluating the serum level of uric acid in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with different histopathological grades. In this descriptive-analytical, case-control study, patients with OSCC and healthy controls were selected and matched regarding age and gender. The serum samples were collected from patients (before radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and controls, and their serum uric acid levels were measured enzymatically. Data were analyzed using independent t-test and ANOVA at 0.05 level of significance. The mean serum uric acid level in OSCC patients (4.2 ± 1.5 mg/dL) and healthy controls (4.38 ± 1.22 mg/dL) was not significantly different (P = 0.377). No significant association was noted between the histopathological grade of OSCC and mean serum uric acid (P = 0.781). The serum uric acid level had a direct significant correlation with age in OSCC patients (P < 0.001). The results of this study did not support the role of uric acid as a protective biomarker in OSCC. Further prospective studies are recommended to better elucidate the role of uric acid in the etiology of OSCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33005687 PMCID: PMC7509556 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5185423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Gender and age of participants, location of OSCC lesions, and histopathological tumor grade.
| Case | Control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 20 (50%) | 20 (50%) | 1 |
| Female | 20 (50%) | 20 (50%) | |
| Age (years) | 46.43 ± 10.57 | 47.3 ± 8.76 | 0.244 |
| Tumor location | Number (percentage) | ||
| Tongue | 20 (50%) | ||
| Buccal mucosa | 10 (25%) | ||
| Lower lip | 5 (12.5%) | ||
| Floor of the mouth | 3 (7.5%) | ||
| Upper lip | 2 (5%) | ||
| Total | 40 (100%) | ||
| Histopathologic grade | Number (percentage) | ||
| Well differentiated | 18 (45%) | ||
| Moderately differentiated | 14 (35%) | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 8 (20%) | ||
| Undifferentiated | 0 | ||
| Total | 40 (100%) | ||
Frequency of histopathological grade according to the location of OSCC.
| Location | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tongue | 8 (44.4%) | 8 (57.1%) | 4 (50.0%) |
| Buccal mucosa | 4 (22.2%) | 4 (28.6%) | 2 (25.0%) |
| Lower lip | 3 (16.7%) | 2 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) |
| Upper lip | 2 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Floor of the mouth | 1 (5.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (25.0%) |
Comparison of serum uric acid level between the patient and control groups.
| Serum uric acid level (mg/dL) | Groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Control | ||
| Mean ± std.deviation | 4.2 ± 1.5 | 4.38 ± 1.22 | 0.377 |
| Minimum | 0.64 | 3 | |
| Maximum | 7.9 | 8.2 | |
Serum uric acid level in the patient group according to gender.
| Serum uric acid level | Gender | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||
| Mean ± std.deviation (mg/dL) | 4.43 ± 1.66 | 4 ± 1.32 | 0.201 |
| Minimum | 1.8 | 0.64 | |
| Maximum | 7.9 | 5.8 | |
Correlation of histopathological tumor grade and serum uric acid level.
| Uric acid level | Grade |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Moderate | High | ||
| Mean ± std.deviation | ||||
| (mg/dL) | 4 ± 1.36 | 4.35 ± 1.83 | 4.36 ± 1.39 |
|
| Minimum | 1.4 | 0.64 | 2.1 | |
| Maximum | 5.9 | 7.9 | 6.9 | |