Literature DB >> 33005664

Antibiotic resistance and genotyping of mecA-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from milk and nasal carriage of dairy water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in the Philippines.

Alona T Badua1,2, Sukolrat Boonyayatra1, Nattakarn Awaiwanont1, Paula Blanca V Gaban3, Claro N Mingala3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mastitis is considered as an economically important disease of dairy buffaloes in Asia. This study examined the mastitis milk and nasal swab samples for the detection and genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in water buffaloes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Staphylococcus aureus was identified based on biochemical tests and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) detection of nuc gene, whereas MRSA on mecA gene. The disc diffusion test was used to determine the antibiotic resistance and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), spa, and multilocus sequence typing for the genotyping of isolates.
RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was detected on 39/93 milk (41.94%) and 27/384 nasal swab (7.03%) samples. However, only nine isolates (23.08%) harbored the mecA gene from milk samples and three isolates (11.11%) from the nasal carriage. All MRSA isolates exhibited resistance to cefoxitin and penicillin, whereas 50% were found resistant to clindamycin. All these isolates were found susceptible to sulfa-trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, whereas the majority of the isolates were susceptible to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and rifampicin. The SCCmec types of the MRSA isolates were type IVc (50.00%), type II (8.33%), type I (8.33%), and non-typeable (33.33%). The spa types and sequence type (ST) identified were t019 (ST30), t701 (ST1649), t311 (ST5), t657 (ST1148), t015 (ST508), t1939 (ST12), t800 (ST9), t091 (ST2454), t138 (ST5991), and t1642 (ST5992).
CONCLUSION: Milk and nasal swab samples from dairy water buffaloes were found positive for MRSA. The MRSA isolates were still susceptible to most antibiotics tested. Moreover, the genotypes of some MRSA isolates were found similar to some human MRSA strains, suggesting a possible human to animal transmission. Copyright: © Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; SCCmec; ST type; mecA; spa type; water buffaloes

Year:  2020        PMID: 33005664      PMCID: PMC7521815          DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res        ISSN: 2311-7710


Introduction

The Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus considered the anterior nares as its colonization site [1]; however, in dairy animals, the mammary gland served as its infection site, causing mastitis [2]. Besides, the anterior nares could be a possible source of contamination for udder and milk in dairy farms [3]. The emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in dairy animals is implicated in the use of antibiotics, particularly β-lactams for the treatment of mastitis, which is attributed to the presence of mecA gene in the staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCC) [4, 5] of these bacteria. The previous studies revealed the presence of drug-resistant MRSA isolates from milk and nasal carriage [6-10]. Drug resistance could pose a zoonotic threat to humans as this could be transferred to those who have direct contact with livestock or through the consumption of animal products such as milk [11]. Molecular typing of MRSA isolates includes staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), spa, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). SCCmec typing classifies the SCC components into types and subtypes [12]. MLST, on the other hand, uses the sequences of the seven housekeeping genes of S. aureus to produce an allelic profile for sequence type (ST) identification [13]. Spa typing involved the interpretation of succession repeats of the sequenced polymorphic region of spa protein A [14]. Molecular typing is essential for the epidemiological tracking of outbreaks or the establishment of a source of infection or contamination. Several reports showed similar SCCmec, spa, and ST types isolated from bovine milk and human, implicating the possible transmission of MRSA from cattle to humans or vice versa [15-19]. In the Philippines, only MRSA prevalence from hospital isolates is available [20], and there are no reports on the antimicrobial resistance status of MRSA on livestock. The increase in the population of dairy water buffaloes in the country was instrumental in boosting the local milk production. This is evident in the rise in the number of smallholder farmers involved in raising water buffaloes to meet the demand for local milk and milk products. With these, there is a need to determine the possible zoonotic threat of MRSA to consumers as well as animal handlers. Moreover, baseline data on the prevalence and genetic profiles of MRSA on livestock are lacking, and the results of this study can be used as a basis for antimicrobial resistance situation and future epidemiological studies. The objective of this study was to examine the mastitic milk and nasal swab samples for the detection and genotyping of MRSA in water buffaloes.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

A written or verbal permission was given to the farm owner/animal handlers/manager before the collection of milk and nasal swab samples. The collection of these samples was done by professional veterinarians. No animals were used for any kind of animal experiments in this study.

Sample collection and identification of S. aureus and MRSA isolates

A total of 93 mastitis-positive milk and nasal swab samples were collected from 384 lactating water buffaloes at the National Impact Zone (NIZ) of the Philippine Carabao Center in the Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Milk samples were collected aseptically using a 15-ml sterile plastic tube. For the nasal swab samples, a sterile cotton swab was inserted in the anterior nares of both the left and right nostrils of the animal. It was rotated against the anterior nasal mucosa. The swab was placed in a sterile plastic test tube containing 1 ml of sterile physiological saline solution. Milk and nasal swab samples were labeled and transported on ice for further laboratory analysis. Milk and nasal swab samples were inoculated on Baird–Parker medium with egg yolk tellurite supplement (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) for 48–72 h at 37°C. S. aureus was identified using catalase and coagulase tests. Furthermore, DNA samples were extracted using the boiling method [21]. Presumptive isolates were then further confirmed as S. aureus and MRSA using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the detection of nuc and mecA genes [22] (Fig. 1). PCR conditions performed were initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 45 sec, and 72°C for 60 sec; and a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. S. aureus American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 43300 was used as a positive control for the PCR procedure. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis using 1.0% agarose gel in 0.5× Tris-Borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 100 V for 25 min.
Figure 1.

PCR amplification of nuc and mecA genes. Lanes1–3 are composite samples, lanes 4–5 are nasal swab samples, lane 6 is the control (ATCC 43300), and M is the marker (100 bp).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

All mecA-positive MRSA isolates were further subjected to a disc diffusion test against 10 antibiotics (HiMedia, India) to determine their antimicrobial resistance (Table 1). ATCC 25923 was used as the quality control, and the resistance was determined based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standard [23].
Table 1.

Antibiotics used for the antibiotic susceptibility test.

Antibiotic discs Concentration
Penicillin G 10 IU
Cefoxitin 30 μg
Clindamycin 2 μg
Rifampicin 5 μg
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 23.75/1.25 μg
Tetracycline 30 μg
Erythromycin 15 μg
Chloramphenicol 30 μg
Ciprofloxacin 5 μg
Gentamycin 10 μg

Genotyping of MRSA isolates

The bacterial DNA of isolates used for the genotyping protocols was determined using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA). MRSA isolates were subjected to multiplex SCCmec typing using specific primers [21] (Table 2). A 25 μl of volume reaction was used containing 2.5 μl of 10× PCR buffer (Promega, Madison, WI), 2.5 μl of 2mM concentration of dNTP (Promega, Madison, WI), 2.75 μl of 50 mM MgCl2 (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.25 μl of Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.50 μl each of the primers, and 100 ng of DNA template. The PCR procedure was performed in a thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) following these conditions: 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 sec, 57°C for 45 sec, and 72°C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. A 2.0% agarose gel was prepared using 0.5× TBE buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and gel electrophoresis was done at 100 V for 35 min.
Table 2.

Primers used in the study.

Primer Oligonucleotide sequence (5’-3’) Amplicon size (bp) Specificity Reference
Multiplex PCR
nuc-1 GCG ATT GAT GGT GAT ACG GTT 279 nuc gene [22]
nuc-2 AGC CAA GCC TTG ACG AAC TAA AGC
MecA147-F GTG AAG ATA TAC CAA GTG ATT 147 mecA gene [21]
MecA147-R ATG CGC TAT AGA TTG AAA GGA T
SCCmec typing
Type I-F GCT TTA AAG AGT GTC GTT ACA GG 613 SCCmec I [21]
Type I-R GTT CTC TCA TAG TAT GAC GTC C
Type II-F CGT TGA AGA TGA TGA AGC G 398 SCCmec II [21]
Type II-R CGA AAT CAA TGG TTA ATG GAC C
Type III-F CCA TAT TGT GTA CGA TGC G 280 SCCmec III [21]
Type III-R CCT TAG TTG TCG TAA CAG ATC G
Type IVa-F GCC TTA TTC GAA GAA ACC G 776 SCCmec IVa [21]
Type IVa-R CTA CTC TTC TGA AAA GCG TCG
Type IVb-F TCT GGA ATT ACT TCA GCT GC 493 SCCmec IVb [21]
Type IVb-R AAA CAA TAT TGC TCT CCC TC
Type IVc-F2 CCT GAA TCT AAA GAG ATA CAC CG 200 SCCmec IVc [21]
Type IVc-R2 GGT TAT TTT CAT AGT GAA TCG C
Type IVd-F5 CTC AAA ATA CGG ACC CCA ATA CA 881 SCCmec IVd [21]
Type IVd-R6 TGC TCC AGT AAT TGC TAA AG
Type V-F GAA CAT TGT TAC TTA AAT GAG CG 325 SCCmec V [21]
Type V-R TGA AAG TTG TAC CCT TGA CAC C
Spa typing
1095F AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C Varied spa gene [24]
1517R GCT TTT GCA ATG TCA TTT ACT G
MLST typing
arcC-Up TTG ATT CAC CAG CGC GTA TTG TC 456 Carbamate kinase [13]
arcC-Dn AGG TAT CTG CTT CAA TCA GCG
aroE-Up ATC GGA AAT CCT ATT TCA CAT TC 456 Shikimate dehydrogenase [13]
aroE-Dn GGT GTT GTA TTA ATA ACG ATA TC
glpF-Up CTA GGA ACT GCA ATC TTA ATC C 465 Glycerol kinase [13]
glpF-Dn TGG TAA AAT CGC ATG TCC AAT TC
gmk-Up ATC GTT TTA TCG GGA CCA TC 429 Guanylate kinase [13]
gmk-Dn TCA TTA ACT ACA ACG TAA TCG TA
pta-Up GTT AAA ATC GTA TTA CCT GAA GG 474 Phosphate acetyltransferase [13]
pta-Dn GAC CCT TTT GTT GAA AAG CTT AA
tpi-Up TCG TTCA TTC TGA ACG TCG TGA A 402 Triosephosphate isomerase [13]
tpi-Dn TTT GCA CCT TCT AAC AAT TGT AC
yqiL-Up CAG CAT ACA GGA CAC CTA TTG GC 516 Acetyl coenzyme A acetyltransferase [13]
yqiL-Dn CGT TGA GGA ATC GAT ACT GGA AC
Spa typing protocol was followed using the specified primers (Table 2) for the PCR procedure [24]. The PCR products after amplification (Fig. 2) were sent for sequencing (1st Base Asia, Malaysia). Spa DNA sequences obtained were aligned using BioEdit 7.0, and the repeat sequences were analyzed using the DNAGear (201203012225) software to determine spa type [25].
Figure 2.

PCR results for the detection of spa gene in milk and nasal swab samples. Lanes 1–5 are composite milk samples, lanes 5–6 are nasal swab samples, and M is the marker (100 bp).

Furthermore, MRSA isolates were subjected to MLST typing [13]. The seven housekeeping genes (arC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL) were amplified using specific primers (Table 2), and the PCR products were sent for sequencing (1st Base Asia, Malaysia). The sequences of the seven housekeeping genes were aligned using BioEdit 7.0 and then submitted to the pubmlst.org/saureus website to determine the allelic profile of the housekeeping genes. ST types were identified based on the allelic combination of each of the isolate. DNA spa sequences of MRSA isolates were sent to the GenBank database for the assignment of accession numbers used for the phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using Molecular Evolution Genetic Analysis version 7 software based on the neighbor-joining method using a bootstrap method of 1,000 replicates.

Results

Identification of S. aureus and MRSA

Based on biochemical tests and detection of the nuc gene, the prevalence of S. aureus on composite milk samples was 41.94% (39/93), whereas 7.03% (27/384) for the nasal swab samples. However, for the identification of MRSA based on PCR detection of the mecA gene, only 9/39 (23.08%) of the milk and 3/27 (11.11%) of the nasal swab isolates were found positive.

Antibiotic susceptibility

The antibiotic susceptibility test results of the 12 mecA-positive MRSA isolates showed a 100% resistance to cefoxitin or methicillin and penicillin. About 50% of the isolates were resistant to clindamycin, whereas 41.67% were found susceptible and 8.33% with intermediate susceptibility. For tetracycline, 8.33% of isolates were resistant, and with intermediate sensitivity, however, 83.33% of isolates were still susceptible. About 75% of MRSA isolates were susceptible to rifampicin, and the remaining 25% had intermediate susceptibility. For both ciprofloxacin and gentamicin, isolates exhibited 91.67% susceptibility and 8.33% with intermediate susceptibility. One-third or around 66.67% of isolates showed an intermediate susceptibility to erythromycin, with only 33.33% of these susceptible. All isolates were still found sensitive to sulfa-trimethoprim and chloramphenicol. Overall, the resistance was detected against cefoxitin (methicillin), penicillin, clindamycin, and tetracycline (Table 3).
Table 3.

Antimicrobial resistance and genotypes of MRSA from milk and nasal swab samples.

Sample ID Source Antibiotic resistance SCCmec type spa repeats Spa type ST type
CM1 Milk PG-CX Type IVc 08-16-02-16-02-25-17-24 t019 ST30
CM17 Milk PG-CX-CD-TC Type IVc 15-16-02-25-17-24-24 t1642 ST5992
CM21 Milk PG-CX Non-typeable 26-23-13-21-17-34-33-34 t657 ST1148
CM23 Milk PG-CX Type II 08-16-02-16-34-13-17-34-16-34 t015 ST508
CM25 Milk PG-CX Type IVc 26-23-17-34-20-17-12-17-16 t311 ST5
CM26 Milk PG-CX-CD Type IVc 08-16-02-25-17-24 t138 ST5991
CM32 Milk PG-CX Type IVc 11-10-21-17-34-24-34-22-25-25 t701 ST1649
CM34 Milk PG-CX-CD Non-typeable 07-23-02-34 t1939 ST12
CM35 Milk PG-CX Type IVc 11-10-21-17-34-24-34-22-25-25 t701 ST1649
NS24 Nasal Swab PG-CX-CD Non-typeable 07-23-21-17-34-12-23-02-12-23 t091 ST2454
NS30 Nasal Swab PG-CX-CD Non-typeable 07-16-12-23-02-12-23-02-34 t800 ST9
NS31 Nasal Swab PG-CX-CD Type I 07-16-12-23-02-12-23-02-34 t800 ST9

PG = Penicillin; CX = Cefoxitin; CD = Clindamycin; TC = Tetracycline.

Genotypes of MRSA isolates

Genotyping of the 12 MRSA isolates was based on SCCmec, spa, and MLST typing (Table 3). The majority of the MRSA isolates that were subjected to SCCmec typing belong to SCCmec type IVc (6/12 or 50.00%), type II (1/12 or 8.33%), type I (1/12 or 8.33%), and non-typeable (4/12 or 33.33%). There were different spa and ST types identified from milk and nasal swab samples (Tables 3 and 4). The spa and ST types of composite milk samples were t019 (ST30), t657 (ST1148), t701 (ST1649), t311 (ST5), t1939 (ST12), and t015 (ST508), and the identification of two novel ST types were t138 (ST5991) and t1642 (ST5992). The three nasal carriage spa types were t800 (ST9) comprising two isolates and t091 (ST2454).
Table 4.

MLST allelic profile and ST of MRSA isolates.

Sample ID Type of Sample arcC aroE glpF gmk pta tpi yqiL ST
CM1 Composite Milk 2 2 2 2 6 3 2 ST30
CM17 Composite Milk 18 18 6 59 13 3 2 ST5992
CM21 Composite Milk 1 61 1 8 12 4 10 ST1148
CM23 Composite Milk 10 40 8 6 10 3 2 ST508
CM25 Composite Milk 1 4 1 4 12 1 10 ST5
CM26 Composite Milk 2 2 2 2 6 287 2 ST5991
CM32 Composite Milk 12 4 1 4 12 1 67 ST1649
CM34 Composite Milk 1 3 1 8 11 5 11 ST12
CM35 Composite Milk 12 4 1 4 12 1 67 ST1649
NS24 Nasal Swab 3 3 1 1 264 1 10 ST2454
NS30 Nasal Swab 3 3 1 1 1 1 10 ST9
NS31 Nasal Swab 3 3 1 1 1 1 10 ST9

Phylogenetic tree of spa sequences

A phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of spa sequences of milk and nasal isolates is shown in Figure 3. The accession numbers assigned by GenBank for the 12 isolates were MT408293–MT408304. Results revealed that the spa sequences from buffalo nasal isolates MT408303 and MT408304 were found related to the goat milk isolate KT764111 and buffalo milk isolate MT408297. Similarly, buffalo milk isolates MT408299 and MT408301 were observed to be related to nasal isolate MT408302. Moreover, the buffalo milk spa sequences MT408295 and MT408293 were closely associated with the spa sequence of the cow isolate MG759499. The related spa sequences of buffalo milk (MT408299, MT408301, MT408295, and MT408293) were also observed in the study.
Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree of spa sequences of milk and nasal samples using neighbor-joining method; red-colored accession numbers were considered outgroup in the analysis.

PG = Penicillin; CX = Cefoxitin; CD = Clindamycin; TC = Tetracycline.

Discussion

Staphylococcus aureus is commonly isolated from mastitis cases in dairy animals. In Asia, water buffaloes play a major role in local milk production. The prevalence of S. aureus from the milk samples in the present study was found higher than the previous reports in Iran and India [26, 27]. Probable reasons for a higher prevalence rate in this study is the lack of proper hygienic measures followed before and after milking of animals as well as the manner of milking used by smallholder or backyard dairy farms. The prevalence rate could vary based on geographical location, breed, management instituted, and hygienic measures followed in the farm [28]. In this study, the detection rate of the mecA gene in mastitis-positive milk samples was 23.08%. In Pakistan, detection of the mecA gene on water buffalo mastitis milk was 38%, higher than what was observed in this report [29]. A lower mecA gene prevalence on mastitis milk was reported from the previous studies in Asia [6,17,27,30,31]. For the nasal carriage in dairy water buffaloes, the finding was in agreement with the low nasal carriage rate on cows from Iran, which was 5.06% [2], and in Tunisia, which was 1.3% [32]. However, a higher rate of S. aureus nasal carriage on cattle was reported from Saudi Arabia which was 50% [33], 15% in Algeria [34], 38% in Nigeria [35], 13.9% in Norway [36], and 54.3% in Greece [37]. Although the results of the present study revealed a low nasal carriage rate, the presence of carrier animals among lactating water buffaloes that could shed bacteria in the dairy farm environment should be considered as this posed a threat to dairy farmworkers. The presence of the mecA gene in the SCC of S. aureus is one resistance mechanism involved against methicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics. The PCR detection of this resistance gene in S. aureus is considered a gold standard for the confirmation of MRSA [38]. All mecA-positive isolates were found to be 100% resistant to both penicillin and cefoxitin (methicillin). The same findings were reported for bovine mastitis milk [26,39,40] and nasal carriage in cattle [9,33,35]. However, there was MRSA isolated from bovine mastitis infected milk, which was observed to be resistant to penicillin [8, 41] or cefoxitin (methicillin) only [29]. A contrasting observation was seen in the previous studies, where 33.33% of MRSA isolates were resistant [30], and 100% were susceptible to cefoxitin [42]. Similarly, MRSA strains from milk and nasal carriage were reported resistant to clindamycin and tetracycline [9,35,42]. The resistance of mecA-positive isolates to penicillin and cefoxitin (a β-lactam) confirms the mechanism involved in the presence of this resistant gene in S. aureus. Cefoxitin is a better inducer of methicillin resistance compared to oxacillin [43] and used to determine the phenotypic MRSA. The probable reason for the presence of antibiotic resistance is the frequent use of β-lactams to treat mastitis infections in dairy water buffaloes in the area. The usual antibiotic resistance profile of livestock-associated MRSA is their resistance to β-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, tetracyclines, partly fluoroquinolones, and cotrimoxazole but susceptible to rifampicin [4] which was observed in this study. The high susceptibility of most isolates to the antibiotics used in the study is a good indication of the many options that can be used for the treatment of mastitis. It is also surprising to note the resistance observed against clindamycin and intermediate susceptibility to erythromycin. These two antibiotics are used in humans and not in dairy animals, suggesting the possible transmission of resistant genes from human to dairy water buffaloes in the area. The presence of drug-resistant MRSA in dairy water buffalo production poses public health concern for a possible spread through milk, in the dairy farm environment, and animal handlers from nasal carriers. In this study, the majority of MRSA isolates from mastitis infected milk samples belonged to SCCmec type IVc. This result is in agreement with several studies on bovine mastitis, where the majority of MRSA isolates were typed as SCCmec type IV [7-8,39,41]. In Uganda, SCCmec type IVc was isolated in one bulk can milk samples collected from households [44]. Moreover, SCCmec type II isolate was identified in raw bovine milk in Iran [45]. SCCmec type IV was also commonly isolated as Community Acquired-Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), whereas SCCmec type II as Hospital Acquired-Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in the Philippines and Korea [46]. Moreover, SCCmec type I has been reported from hospital clinical isolates in the Philippines [47] and commonly carried by HA-MRSA strains [48]. The spa type t019 (ST30)-IV from a milk isolate in this study was also a CA-MRSA strain identified in the Philippines [46, 49]. ST5-IV-t311 and ST1649-IV-t701 were also reported in Argentina but as CA-MRSA clones [50]. The t015-ST508 was isolated from bovine milk with intramammary infections in Europe [51]. Similarly, this was isolated from bovine milk and human nasal swab samples in Africa [52]. Spa type t1939 was isolated from milk of dairy cows belonging to different ST types in Austria and China [53, 54]. Nasal carriage isolates with spa type t800 (ST9) were also reported from clinical isolates in Taiwan [55]. Besides, spa type t091 was detected from persons handling raw meat and meat products in Germany [56]. Moreover, ST9 and ST2454 were reported from pigs in China [57], suggesting that these strains were not only limited to humans but also found on livestock. This is the first documented genetic profiling of MRSA from dairy water buffaloes in the Philippines. The spa and ST types of MRSA reported in this study were different from the ST398 commonly identified in Europe [41,58-60] and ST9 and ST8 in Asia [7-8,39,61]. This study reported some spa types not isolated from bovine mastitis and the identification of two novel ST types (ST5991 and ST5992), implying that these results could be considered new spa and ST types associated with mastitis cases. Similarly, the identification of CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA strains in dairy water buffaloes could suggest the presence of human strains in the dairy animal population. There were studies conducted, implicating the presence of genetically related MRSA strains from both animal handlers or milkers and dairy animals [62, 63]. The bootstrap values infer the close relationship of the spa sequences of nasal and milk isolates (Fig. 3). This suggests that nasal carriage could be a possible transmission pathway for milk contamination [3]. The detection of related spa milk isolates implies that there were common spa types contaminating milk of dairy buffalos in different dairy farms within the province of Nueva Ecija. The presence of closely related spa milk isolates from buffalo, cow, and goat indicates the presence of common spa types causing mastitis in ruminants. Aside from nasal carriage, other possible modes of the transmission of MRSA to dairy buffaloes should be considered. Humans with MRSA could serve as potential risk factors for transmission to dairy animals [18,62-63]. However, this study was only limited to the detection of MRSA in dairy water buffaloes and not in animal handlers; thus, the transmission of human strains cannot be established.

Conclusion

MRSA was detected on mastitis milk and nasal carriage in dairy water buffaloes. MRSA isolates were found resistant against penicillin, cefoxitin (methicillin), and clindamycin. The susceptibility of isolates to most antibiotics used in the study offered more options for the treatment of mastitis in dairy water buffaloes. Most MRSA isolates belonged to SCCmec type IVc with different spa and ST types different from dairy animals in Asia and Europe. These results also identified two novel ST types (ST5991 and ST5992) associated with mastitis. Furthermore, the nasal carriage was considered as a possible transmission pathway for milk contamination in this study. Moreover, the detection of MRSA isolates similar to human MRSA strains suggests the need to investigate its transmission to dairy water buffaloes further.
  55 in total

1.  Antimicrobial resistance, virulence gene profile and molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from dairy cows in Xinjiang Province, northwest China.

Authors:  Meng Dan; Wu Yehui; Meng Qingling; Qiao Jun; Zhang Xingxing; Ma Shuai; Cai Kuojun; Zhang Jinsheng; Cheng Zibing; Zhang Zaichao; Cai Xuepeng
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements.

Authors: 
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy sheep.

Authors:  E Vautor; G Abadie; J-M Guibert; N Chevalier; M Pépin
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2005-04-10       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Rise and subsequent decline of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST30-IVc in Copenhagen, Denmark through an effective search and destroy policy.

Authors:  M D Bartels; K Kristoffersen; K Boye; H Westh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Methicillin (Oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans.

Authors:  John Hwa Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-Screen latex agglutination test for detection of MRSA of animal origin.

Authors:  John H Lee; Jae-Myung Jeong; Yong-Ho Park; Sung-Sun Choi; Yong-Hwan Kim; Joon-Seok Chae; Jin-San Moon; Hyun Park; Shin Kim; Seong-Kug Eo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Prevalence and Characterization of Oxacillin Susceptible mecA-Positive Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus Causing Bovine Mastitis in India.

Authors:  Hiral Mistry; Paresh Sharma; Sudipta Mahato; R Saravanan; P Anand Kumar; Vasundhra Bhandari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Causing Bovine Mastitis between 2014 and 2015.

Authors:  Tianming Li; Huiying Lu; Xing Wang; Qianqian Gao; Yingxin Dai; Jun Shang; Min Li
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Detection of methicillin resistance and slime factor production of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis.

Authors:  Alper Ciftci; Arzu Findik; Ertan Emek Onuk; Serap Savasan
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

10.  Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from tertiary care hospitals.

Authors:  Atif H Asghar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.088

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changes in the lipidome of water buffalo milk during intramammary infection by non-aureus Staphylococci.

Authors:  Fabrizio Ceciliani; Matteo Audano; Maria Filippa Addis; Nico Mitro; Cristina Lecchi; Morteza H Ghaffari; Mariangela Albertini; Esterina De Carlo; Domenico Vecchio; Gabriele Di Vuolo; Giovanna Cappelli; Francesco Tangorra; Renata Piccinini; Valerio Bronzo; Donatella Caruso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Peptidomic changes in the milk of water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) with intramammary infection by non-aureus staphylococci.

Authors:  Maria Filippa Addis; Elisa Margherita Maffioli; Martina Penati; Mariangela Albertini; Valerio Bronzo; Renata Piccinini; Francesco Tangorra; Gabriella Tedeschi; Giovanna Cappelli; Gabriele Di Vuolo; Domenico Vecchio; Esterina De Carlo; Fabrizio Ceciliani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Molecular fingerprinting of bovine mastitis-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates from India.

Authors:  Madhavi Annamanedi; P Sheela; Srinivasaiah Sundareshan; Shrikrishna Isloor; Priya Gupta; Pagala Jasmeen; Madhuranjana Gargi; Sathi Mallick; Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.