| Literature DB >> 33004079 |
Alfonsina D'Amato1, Lorenzo Di Cesare Mannelli2, Elena Lucarini2, Angela L Man3, Gwenaelle Le Gall4, Jacopo J V Branca5, Carla Ghelardini2, Amedeo Amedei5, Eugenio Bertelli6, Mari Regoli6, Alessandra Pacini5, Giulia Luciani5, Pasquale Gallina2,7, Annalisa Altera6, Arjan Narbad8, Massimo Gulisano5, Lesley Hoyles9, David Vauzour10, Claudio Nicoletti11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gut-brain axis and the intestinal microbiota are emerging as key players in health and disease. Shifts in intestinal microbiota composition affect a variety of systems; however, evidence of their direct impact on cognitive functions is still lacking. We tested whether faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from aged donor mice into young adult recipients altered the hippocampus, an area of the central nervous system (CNS) known to be affected by the ageing process and related functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33004079 PMCID: PMC7532115 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00914-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Comparison of the faecal microbiotas of adult and aged mice. a Measures of alpha diversity. Significance of differences between the two groups was assessed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. b MDS plot of a Bray-Curtis assessment of beta diversity. Data presented are for ASVs present in more than two animals and prevalence threshold of 1% at the genus level. c Comparison of the relative abundance of different genera present in the faecal microbiota of the two cohorts. Purple text, significantly different (Welch’s t test and Wilcoxon; P < 0.05, Benjamini-Hochberg) based on ALDEx2 analyses
Fig. 2Pearson correlation of faecal microbiomic and metabolomic data for adult and aged mice. ALDEx2 was used to correlate the datasets. +, P < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg). Only rows/columns containing significant data are shown. (8 mice/group)
Fig. 3Pearson correlation of faecal microbiomic and metabolomic data for adult and aged mice. ALDEx2 was used to correlate the datasets. +, P < 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg). All data are shown (8 mice/group)
Fig. 4Effect of FMT on the faecal microbiotas of adult mice. a Measures of alpha diversity among the pooled adult (n = 1) and aged (n = 1) samples, the adult mice pre FMT (n = 11) and the adult mice after FMT with adult (n = 4) and aged (n = 7) faeces. b MDS plot of a Bray-Curtis assessment of beta diversity. Data presented are for ASVs present in more than two animals and prevalence threshold of 1% at the genus level. c Box plots for the genera that were significantly different (Welch’s t test and Wilcoxon; P < 0.1, Benjamini-Hochberg) between post FMT adult (n = 4) and post FMT aged (n = 7) mice based on ALDEx2 analyses. d Pearson correlation of faecal microbiomic and metabolomic data. Only rows/columns that contained significant data (P < 0.1, Benjamini-Hochberg) are shown
Fig. 5Effect of FMT from adult and old mice on spatial learning and memory. Barnes maze test (Fig. 3a–c): mice were trained to find the cage for 4 consecutive days (twice daily; 2 trials). The average primary latency (Fig. 3a) was significantly higher for adult recipients of microbiota from aged donors (FMT-aged) than the other control groups either left untreated or colonized with microbiota from adult, age-matched donors (FMT-adult). Furthermore, during the retention test, FMT-aged mice spent less time in the target quadrant that contained the escape tunnel compared to control groups (Fig. 3b; heat map in Fig. 3c). The values represent the mean ± SEM for each group (n = 10–12 mice/group). *P < 0.05 vs control animals and FMT-adult. The novel object recognition test (Fig. 3d–e): on day 1, mice were exposed to two similar objects (A + A); on day 2, animals were re-exposed to the testing area containing one novel object (A + B). The time spent by the animals exploring each object was recorded. The discrimination index, calculated as (TB-TA)/(TB + TA), was used to assess the preference for the novel object. Control groups, either untreated or FMT-adult mice, preferred the novel object more than the familiar one, whereas FMT-aged mice showed a significant reduction in the time spent exploring the novel object (heat map in 3e) suggesting reduced discrimination as a consequence of impaired memory capabilities. The values represent the mean ± SEM for each group (n = 10–12 mice/group). **P < 0.01 vs control animals
Fig. 6Effect of FMT from adult and old mice on locomotor and explorative activity and anxiety-related behaviour. Open field test did not show significant difference in the distance travelled by both FMT-aged and FMT-adult was observed when compared to the untreated control group indicating no significant motor impairments of the animals (Fig. 4a). However, FMT-aged mice displayed a tendency to prefer the periphery or the corners of the arena instead of the centre (Fig. 4b). The representative tracks of movement patterns are depicted in Fig. 4c–e (ANY-maze software). Furthermore, in the elevated plus maze, FMT-aged mice did not display significant differences in time spent in either arms of the maze compared to control groups (Fig. 4f, g). The values represent the mean ± SEM for each group (n = 10–12 mice/group)
Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA)
| Functions annotation | Activation | Molecules | # molecules | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell-to-cell signalling and Interaction, nervous system development and function | Synaptic transmission | 2.83E−11 | − 1.763 | AMPH, ANKS1B, CAMK2A, CNP, CPNE6, DLG2, DLG4, DPYSL2, ERC2, FBXO2, GNAI2, HNRNPK, MAPT, NAPA, NPTX1, NRCAM, NSF, PAFAH1B1, PARK7, PPP3CA, PPP3R1, PRKCG, PSMC5, RAB3A, S100B, H3GL2, SLC12A5, SLC1A3, SNAP25, SNPH, SYN1, SYN2, SYNGAP1, UNC13A, VDAC1 | 35 |
| Behaviour | Learning | 2.72E−14 | − 1.697 | ACTG1, AMPH, ATP1A3, CAMK2A, CFL1, CKB, CKMT1A/CKMT1B, CPT1C, CRMP1, CTNND2, DLG3, DLG4, ELAVL4, FBXO2, GMFB, GSK3B, HAPLN1, KCNAB2, MAPT, NCAM1, NCDN, NRAS, NRCAM, NTRK2, PAFAH1B1, PARK7, PDE1B, PEX5L, PPP3CA, PPP3R1, PRKAR1A, PRKAR2B, PRKCG, RTN4, S100B, SHANK1, SLC12A5, SNAP25, SOD2, SRCIN1, SYNGAP1, SYNJ1, SYNPO, TRIM3, TSN, VDAC1 | 46 |
| Cell-to-cell signalling and interaction, nervous system development and function | Neurotransmission | 4.44E−12 | − 1.656 | AMPH, ANKS1B, CAMK2A, CNP, CPNE6, DLG2, DLG4, DNM1, DPYSL2, ERC2, FBXO2, GDAP1, GNAI2, HNRNPK, KCTD12, MAPT, NAPA, Nefm, NPTX1, NRCAM, NSF, NTRK2, PAFAH1B1, PARK7, PPP3CA, PPP3R1, PRKCG, PSMC5, RAB3A, S100B, SH3GL2, SLC12A5, SLC1A3, SNAP25, SNPH, SRCIN1, SYN1, SYN2, SYNGAP1, UNC13A, VDAC1 | 41 |
| Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, nervous system development and function | Elongation of neurites | 4.27E−08 | − 0.228 | ALCAM, CAMK2A, DPYSL2, GNAS, MAPT, NTRK2, OMG, PACSIN1, PAFAH1B1, PFN1, PFN2, RAB35 | 12 |
| Behaviour | Locomotion | 6.83E−07 | − 0.087 | ABAT, AGAP2, ATP1A1, ATP1A3, CAMK2A, CNP, DLG3, DLG4, DNM1, ELAVL4, GMFB, HINT1, MAPT, NCAM1, NEFL, NRCAM, NTRK2, OMG, OXR1, PAFAH1B1, PARK7, PDE1B, RTN4, SNAP25, SOD1, SOD2, SPTBN4, TSN | 28 |
Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of the significantly up- and downregulated proteins (after Bonferroni correction) in the hippocampus of young mice transplanted with faeces from aged donors (FMT-aged) versus young mice transplanted with faeces transplant from young age-matched mice (FMT-adult). The enriched categories, related to specific function annotations, the P value, the z-score of the software and the involved proteins are displayed
Fig. 7Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). IPA of the significantly up- and downregulated proteins (after Bonferroni correction) for faeces from aged donors transplanted in adult mice versus faeces from adult donors transplanted in adult age-matched mice, in the hippocampus tissue. The circles represent the main network node and the blue colour the significantly downregulated nodes. The upregulated proteins are marked red, while those that that were downregulated are marked in green. The intensity of the colour relates to fold-change (light to dark colour = small to large fold change). The symbols shown in the network are explained at http://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis
Fig. 8Pearson correlation of faecal microbiomic and proteomic (hippocampus) data. Only rows/columns that contained significant data (P < 0.1, Benjamini-Hochberg) are shown
Fig. 9FMT from aged donors does not affect either gut permeability or circulating cytokines. Mice were orally administered with a solution of FITC-dextran and plasma levels measured after 180 min. No differences were observed between FMT-adult and FMT-aged recipients. Plasma samples were also used to evaluate levels of circulating cytokines; also in this case we failed to observe any significant change of circulating pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in both group of FMT-treated mice (n = 8 mice/group)
Fig. 10Post-FMT levels of GFAP and F4/80 in hippocampal areas. Representative images acquired at the confocal microscope with anti-GFAP antibody (green) and the relevant fluorescent intensity in different areas of the hippocampus (a–h). No difference was observed between FMT-adult (left panels a, d and g) and FMT-aged (middle panels b, e and h) in the expression of GFAP. The analysis was carried out in the dentate gyrus region (a, b, fluorescent intensity shown in c), CA4 region (d, e, fluorescent intensity shown in f) and CA3 region (g–I, fluorescent intensity shown in i). By contrast, a significant increase of the expression of F4/80 (red) (j, k, fluorescent intensity shown in l) was observed in the white matter of the hippocampus fimbria between FMT-adult (j) and FMT-aged mice (k). The detail of the hippocampus regions investigated are displayed in Additional File 13. Fluorescence intensity bars represent the mean ± SEM from 3 mice/group and asterisk indicates P = 0.0168. Nuclei have been counterstained with ToPro-3 (in blue). (scale bars 30 μm)