Literature DB >> 33002683

In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation rates of hydrophobic chemicals in rainbow trout.

Leslie J Saunders1, Patrick N Fitzsimmons2, John W Nichols2, Frank A P C Gobas3.   

Abstract

Hepatic in vitro biotransformation assays, in combination with in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) and bioaccumulation modeling, can be used to support regulatory bioaccumulation assessments. In most applications, however, these methods ignore the possibility of extrahepatic metabolism. Here we evaluated intestinal biotransformation in rainbow trout using S9 fractions prepared from the upper intestinal (GIT) epithelium. Measured levels of activity determined using standard substrates for phase I and phase II biotransformation enzymes were within 2-fold of activities measured in hepatic S9 fractions. In vitro intrinsic clearance rates for 2-ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC; an organic sunscreen agent) and two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pyrene [PYR] and benzo(a)pyrene [BAP]) were significantly higher in liver S9 fractions than in GIT S9 fractions. For octocrylene (OCT; a second sunscreen agent), however, in vitro intrinsic clearance rates were higher in GIT S9 fractions compared to liver S9 fractions. An existing 'liver only' IVIVE model was expanded to consider biotransformation in both the liver and GIT. Relevant IVIVE scaling factors were developed by morphological, histological, and biochemical evaluation of trout intestines. For chemicals biotransformed at higher rates by hepatic S9 fractions (i.e., BAP, PYR, EHMC), the 'liver & GIT' model yielded whole-body biotransformation rate constants (kMET) that were within 1.2 to 1.4-fold of those estimated using the 'liver only' model. In contrast to these findings, the mean kMET for OCT obtained using the 'liver & GIT' model was 3.3 times higher than the mean kMET derived using the 'liver only' model and was in good agreement with empirical kMET estimates determined previously for trout (<20 % difference). The results of this study suggest that current 'liver only' IVIVE approaches may underestimate in vivo biotransformation rates for chemicals that undergo substantial biotransformation in the GIT.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal alternatives; Bioaccumulation; Biotransformation; In vitro-in vivo extrapolation; Intestinal metabolism; Rainbow trout

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33002683      PMCID: PMC7962060          DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  53 in total

1.  Commentary: a physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance.

Authors:  G R Wilkinson; D G Shand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  A food web bioaccumulation model for organic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Jon A Arnot; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of quantitative hepatic biotransformation data for fish. II. Modeled effects on chemical bioaccumulation.

Authors:  John W Nichols; Patrick N Fitzsimmons; Lawrence P Burkhard
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Evaluation of bioaccumulation using in vivo laboratory and field studies.

Authors:  Annie V Weisbrod; Kent B Woodburn; Albert A Koelmans; Thomas F Parkerton; Anne E McElroy; Katrine Borgå
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Bioaccumulation assessment using predictive approaches.

Authors:  John W Nichols; Mark Bonnell; Sabcho D Dimitrov; Beate I Escher; Xing Han; Nynke I Kramer
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Measurement of kinetic parameters for biotransformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by trout liver S9 fractions: Implications for bioaccumulation assessment.

Authors:  John W Nichols; Melanie A Ladd; Patrick N Fitzsimmons
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2018

7.  Toward improved models for predicting bioconcentration of well-metabolized compounds by rainbow trout using measured rates of in vitro intrinsic clearance.

Authors:  John W Nichols; Duane B Huggett; Jon A Arnot; Patrick N Fitzsimmons; Christina E Cowan-Ellsberry
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Hepatic versus extrahepatic expression of CYP3A30 and CYP3A56 in adult killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus).

Authors:  Tove Hegelund; Malin C Celander
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  The sorptive capacity of animal protein.

Authors:  Adrian M H deBruyn; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Isolation and characterization of intestinal epithelial cells from normal and SIV-infected rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Diganta Pan; Arpita Das; David Liu; Ronald S Veazey; Bapi Pahar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.