Literature DB >> 17705657

The sorptive capacity of animal protein.

Adrian M H deBruyn1, Frank A P C Gobas.   

Abstract

Partition coefficients that are used to predict concentrations of hydrophobic organic chemicals in biota (e.g., the bioconcentration factor) often assume that the sorptive capacity of an organism or tissue is adequately represented by its lipid content. In lean organisms and tissues, however, theory suggests that partitioning may be strongly influenced by the sorptive capacity of nonlipid materials, such as protein. Little is known about the sorptive capacity of proteins for hydrophobic organic chemicals, and methods to include proteins in bioaccumulation models do not exist. Here, we present a compilation and meta-analysis of published data to estimate the relative sorptive capacities of animal proteins and lipids for neutral organic chemicals. We found that the estimated sorptive capacity of protein in solid animal tissues ranged from around 1 to 10% that of lipid for compounds with a log octanol/water partition coefficient (K(OW)) of greater than two. The sorptive capacity of blood protein (albumin) appeared to be substantially higher than this, especially for low-K(OW) chemicals. For modeling purposes, we recommend estimating the sorptive capacity of animal protein as 5% that of lipid. According to this estimate, the sorptive capacity of an animal or tissue will be dominated by the contribution from protein if the lipid content makes up less than 5% of the dry-weight organic content. In such situations, a consideration of the sorptive capacity of nonlipid constituents, such as protein, will permit more accurate predictions of chemical accumulation and distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705657     DOI: 10.1897/07-016R.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  6 in total

1.  Concentration dependence of in vitro biotransformation rates of hydrophobic organic sunscreen agents in rainbow trout S9 fractions: Implications for bioaccumulation assessment.

Authors:  Leslie J Saunders; Simon Fontanay; John W Nichols; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Toxicokinetics of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  John A Frew; Jacob T Brown; Patrick N Fitzsimmons; Alex D Hoffman; Martin Sadilek; Christian E Grue; John W Nichols
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.228

3.  In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation rates of hydrophobic chemicals in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Leslie J Saunders; Patrick N Fitzsimmons; John W Nichols; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Continuing Persistence and Biomagnification of DDT and Metabolites in Northern Temperate Fruit Orchard Avian Food Chains.

Authors:  Robert Kesic; John E Elliott; Kate M Fremlin; Lewis Gauthier; Kenneth G Drouillard; Christine A Bishop
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.218

5.  Quantitative relationship between the octanol/water partition coefficient and the diffusion limitation of the exchange between adipose and blood.

Authors:  David G Levitt
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-07

6.  Measured and modeled toxicokinetics in cultured fish cells and application to in vitro-in vivo toxicity extrapolation.

Authors:  Julita Stadnicka-Michalak; Katrin Tanneberger; Kristin Schirmer; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.