Literature DB >> 33001381

Randomized Prospective Clinical Study of Spatz3® Adjustable Intragastric Balloon Treatment with a Control Group: a Large-Scale Brazilian Experiment.

Ricardo José Fittipaldi-Fernandez1, Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho2,3, Cristina Fajardo Diestel4, Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein4, Marcelo Falcão de Santana5,6, João Henrique Felicio de Lima7, Fernando Santos Silva Bastos5,6, Newton Teixeira Dos Santos8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the results regarding weight loss and complications related to the Spatz3® adjustable intragastric balloon (IGB) in Brazil.
METHODS: This randomized prospective study covered patients who had undergone treatment using a Spatz3® adjustable IGB between October 2016 and June 2018 at a private clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The patients had a minimum body mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2. The study examined complications of Spatz3® treatment and BMI reduction, percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and % of excess weight loss (%EWL).
RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients underwent a Spatz3® balloon implant in the period. The patients were randomly divided into one group in which the Spatz balloon was kept at the same volume (600 mL) throughout treatment (Control Group), and another adjustment group with 250 mL greater volume. The complication rate was 16.14%. No death or major complication occurred during the study. Mean BMI decreased from 39.51 to 32.84 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001), bodyweight from 111.87 to 90.28 kg (p < 0.0001), and excess weight from 41.55 to 22.99 kg (p < 0.0001). The adjustment resulted in greater mean weight loss of 4.35 kg (- 8 to 17.6 kg), and the average time of the procedure was 7.12 ± 1.63 months. The upward adjustment group did not present greater %TWL, %EWL, or BMI reduction when compared with the control group (p = 0.4413, p = 0,9245, p = 0.2729, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that Spatz3® IGB treatment is an effective procedure for weight reduction, with no mortality but higher morbidity compared with traditional IGBs. This procedure also enabled the balloon to stay in place for longer. The efficacy of upward adjustment still requires further confirmation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Intragastric balloon; Obesity; Overweight; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33001381     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  18 in total

1.  Spatz 3 Adjustable Intragastric Balloon: Long-Term Safety Concerns.

Authors:  Fady Daniel; Carla Abou Fadel; Zaher Houmani; Nader Salti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) versus Spatz Adjustable Balloon System (ABS): Our experience in the elderly.

Authors:  Teresa Russo; Giovanni Aprea; Cesare Formisano; Simona Ruggiero; Gennaro Quarto; Raffaele Serra; Guido Massa; Luigi Sivero
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Adjustable intragastric balloon vs non-adjustable intragastric balloon: case-control study on complications, tolerance, and efficacy.

Authors:  Alfredo Genco; Daniela Dellepiane; Giovanni Baglio; Fulvio Cappelletti; Francesca Frangella; Roberta Maselli; Maria Chiara Dante; Romina Camoirano; Michele Lorenzo; Nicola Basso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Are intra-gastric adjustable balloon system safe? A case series.

Authors:  R Yap Kannan; M R Nutt
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-13

Review 5.  Current status of intragastric balloon for obesity treatment.

Authors:  Seung Han Kim; Hoon Jai Chun; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yoon Tae Jeen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  One-year adjustable intragastric balloons: results in 73 consecutive patients in the U.K.

Authors:  J Brooks; E D Srivastava; E M H Mathus-Vliegen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iñaki Imaz; Carmen Martínez-Cervell; Elvira Elena García-Alvarez; Juan Manuel Sendra-Gutiérrez; Jesús González-Enríquez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Effect of the BioEnterics intragastric balloon on weight, insulin resistance, and liver steatosis in obese patients.

Authors:  Rosario Forlano; Antonio Massimo Ippolito; Angelo Iacobellis; Antonio Merla; Maria Rosa Valvano; Grazia Niro; Vito Annese; Angelo Andriulli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  Endoscopic Devices for Obesity.

Authors:  Kartik Sampath; Amreen M Dinani; Richard I Rothstein
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-06

10.  Adjustable intragastric balloons: a 12-month pilot trial in endoscopic weight loss management.

Authors:  Evzen Machytka; Pavel Klvana; Asher Kornbluth; Steven Peikin; Lisbeth E M Mathus-Vliegen; Christopher Gostout; Gontrand Lopez-Nava; Scott Shikora; Jeffrey Brooks
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.