| Literature DB >> 32998716 |
N Oosterom1,2, M Fiocco3,4,5, R Q H Kloos6, I M van der Sluis3, R Pieters3, B D van Zelst7, D E C Smith8, M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink3, R de Jonge8, S G Heil7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After High-Dose Methotrexate (HD-MTX), folinic acid rescue therapy (Leucovorin) is administered to reduce side effects in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Leucovorin and MTX are structural analogues, possibly competing for cellular transport and intracellular metabolism. We hypothesize that Leucovorin accumulates during consecutive courses, which might result in a lower MTX uptake.Entities:
Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Leucovorin; Methotrexate; Pediatric oncology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32998716 PMCID: PMC7526241 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07422-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Mechanism of action MTX and LV. Overview of the folate pathway with separate folate isoforms and converting enzymes in relation to the mechanism of action of MTX. MTX enters the cell through RFC1, PCFT and MFR. MTX is then polyglutamated (−PG) by FPGS and depolyglutamated by GGH, after which MTX is exported out of the cell by ABC transporters. MTX(−PG) inhibits TS and DHFR. Leucovorin (5-formylTHF) is represented in bold / italic and bypasses the action of DHFR. Abbreviations: ABCB1 - ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1; ABCC1–4 - ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 1–4; ABCG2 - ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily G Member 2; DHF – Dihydrofolate; DHFR – Dihydrofolate Reductase; FPGS – Folylpolyglutamate Synthetase; GGH – Gamma-Glutamyl Hydrolase; MFR – Membrane Folate Transporter; MTHFR - Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase; MTHFD1 - Methylenetetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase, Cyclohydrolase And Formyltetrahydrofolate Synthetase 1; PCFT – Proton-Coupled Folate Transporter; RFC1 – Reduced Folate Carrier; SHMT - Serine hydroxymethyltransferase; THF – tetrahydrofolate; TS – Thymidylate Synthase. This Figure was created using Microsoft Office Powerpoint
Patient characteristics
| Patient characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis in years, | 4.2 (1.6–17.7) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| | 18 (42%) |
| | 25 (58%) |
| Immunophenotype ALL, n (%) | |
| | 38 (88%) |
| | 5 (12%) |
| Risk group ALL-10 protocol, n (%) | |
| | 19 (44%) |
| | 24 (56%) |
| Protocol M characteristics | |
| Duration Protocol M in days, | 65 (56–83) |
| Extra hospital admissions during protocol M, | 12 (7%) |
| Duration HD-MTX hospital admission in days, | |
| | 2 (2–13) |
| | 2 (2–5) |
| | 2 (2–8) |
| | 2 (2–6) |
| Toxicity during Protocol M (NCI CTC) | |
| Number of infections, | 10 (23%) |
| Number of Erythrocyte transfusions per patient, median (range) | 0 (0–3) |
| Number of Thrombocyte transfusions per patient, median (range) | 0 (0–1) |
| Leukopenia, n (%) | |
| | 28 (65%) |
| | 15 (35%) |
| Neutropenia, n (%) | |
| | 17 (40%) |
| | 26 (60%) |
| Increased creatinine T48 | |
| | 43 (100%) |
| | 0 (0%) |
| Neurotoxicity | |
| | 42 (98%) |
| | 1 (2%) |
| Oral Mucositis | |
| | 28 (65%) |
| | 15 (35%) |
Patient characteristics of n = 43 pediatric acute lympoblastic leukemia patients included in this study
NCI CTC national cancer institute CTCAE criteria
Intracellular MTX-PG and eryfolate levels (n = 43)
| RBC MTX-PG, in nmol/L | median | IQR | Delta RBC MTX-PG, in nmol/L | median | IQR |
| MTX-PG2, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 1.4 | (1.2–2.4) | |||
| | 8.0 | (4.9–15.5) | |||
| | 12.6 | (6.7–23.8) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 1.9 | (−0.8–7.9) |
| | 11.0 | (6.1–20.6) | Course 3 – Course 2 | −1.7 | (−8.7–1.5) |
| | 10.8 | (6.2–25.3) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 0.2 | (−5.4–8.3) |
| MTX-PG3, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 2.5 | (1.3–3.9) | |||
| | 14.3 | (9.4–19.6) | |||
| | 26.2 | (20.5–34.7) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 11.3 | (8.4–17.4) |
| | 31.1 | (20.6–39.9) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 4.2 | (0.1–7.6) |
| | 33.0 | (27.1–43.5) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 3.1 | (− 5.5–10.9) |
| MTX-PG4, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 2.2 | (1.3–2.5) | |||
| | 20.2 | (11.2–28.3) | |||
| | 35.8 | (24.5–56.3) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 16.6 | (9.0–27.5) |
| | 46.5 | 31.2–59.1) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 7.6 | (3.8–13.2) |
| | 48.7 | (34.0–71.4) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 10.0 | (−4.4–16.2) |
| MTX-PG5, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 1.6 | (1.1–2.0) | |||
| | 18.2 | (8.3–22.8) | |||
| | 29.9 | (22.0–45.2) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 12.8 | (7.5–23.1) |
| | 36.5 | (20.6–49.3) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 6.6 | (1.7–11.0) |
| | 42.9 | (23.6–56.5) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 6.2 | (−8.6–13.0) |
| Sum MTX-PG2–5, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 7.5 | (4.2–9.2) | |||
| | 60.7 | (41.0–92.0) | |||
| | 113.0 | (76.8–165.2) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 43.0 | (27.9–80.1) |
| | 131.6 | (88.9–170.7) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 19.4 | (−0.9–33.0) |
| | 141.3 | (100.2–190.2) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 15.2 | (−18.7–44.7) |
| RBC Folate, in nmol/L | Delta RBC Folate, in nmol/L | ||||
| 5-methylTHF, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 185.7 | (97.8–215.7) | |||
| | 150.3 | (56.6–300.6) | |||
| | 218.3 | (91.1–386.4) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 82.2 | (−0.6–146.3) |
| | 227.8 | (151.2–384.3) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 23.2 | (−48.8–67.8) |
| | 228.9 | (134.9–356.0) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 33.6 | (−71.5–107.0) |
| Non-methylTHF, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 42.6 | (27.9–67.7) | |||
| | 61.9 | (39.8–132.7) | |||
| | 88.1 | (49.3–169.7) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 1.8 | (−24.4–82.7) |
| | 106.3 | (63.2–208.8) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 14.2 | (−90.9–56.7) |
| | 94.8 | (59.0–163.9) | Course 4 – Course 3 | −6.9 | (−80.2–54.4) |
| Folic acid, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 11.8 | (8.0–13.7) | |||
| | 11.5 | (7.9–21.1) | |||
| | 17.3 | (10.1–22.3) | Course 2 – Course 1 | −0.9 | (−5.3–4.7) |
| | 13.3 | (7.7–20.8) | Course 3 – Course 2 | −4.3 | (−11.5–1.4) |
| | 13.0 | (9.0–24.8) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 2.0 | (−8.1–8.5) |
| Sum folate, median (IQR) | |||||
| | 255.2 | (151.7–290.9) | |||
| | 290.1 | (152.7–453.8) | |||
| | 401.6 | (163.3–594.2) | Course 2 – Course 1 | + 75.9 | (−51.0–194.9) |
| | 411.5 | (240.3–665.6) | Course 3 – Course 2 | + 39.4 | (−169.1–128.1) |
| | 361.5 | (217.5–511.0) | Course 4 – Course 3 | + 20.6 | (− 162.4–199.6) |
| Ratio RBC Folate / MTX-PG2–5 | Delta Ratio RBC Folate / MTX-PG2–5 | ||||
| | 4.7 | (2.7–6.9) | |||
| | 3.3 | (2.2–5.2) | Course 2 – Course 1 | −2.6 | (−9.7–0.1) |
| | 3.4 | (1.8–5.5) | Course 3 – Course 2 | −0.7 | (−2.4–0.9) |
| | 2.7 | (1.7–4.5) | Course 4 – Course 3 | − 0.6 | (− 2.1–1.3) |
Levels are measured in n = 43 patients every 2 weeks after a HD-MTX and LV course at time of qualification for the next course
Course 1: MTX-PG in n = 2 missing + Folate in n = 4 missing
Course 2: MTX-PG in n = 5 missing + Folate in n = 8 missing
Course 3: MTX-PG in n = 4 missing + Folate in n = 5 missing
Course 4: MTX-PG in n = 6 missing + Folate in n = 8 missing
aMTX-PG and folate levels were available in n = 8 patients at start of protocol M before administration of HD-MTX and LV – as these levels were only measured only in n = 8 patients we did not analyse these levels in the linear mixed model
IQR interquartile range
Fig. 2Median intracellular MTX-PG and folate levels during four consecutive courses. Measurements were performed in n = 8 patients at start of protocol M and in n = 43 patients every 2 weeks after a HD-MTX and LV course at time of qualification for the next course. Both intracellular MTX-PG (a) and folate (b) levels increased significantly during protocol M over time (p < 0.001). The ratio folate/MTX-PG (c) decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001). The bold line represents the median levels of patients over time. This Figure was created using Graphpad Prism version 8.3
Fig. 3Individual MTX-PG and folate levels over time. Measurements were performed in n = 43 patients every 2 weeks after a HD-MTX and LV course at time of qualification for the next course. Folate levels (blue line) and MTX-PG (red line) levels in 43 individual patients are depicted over time after four HD-MTX and LV courses (a). The ratio folate / MTX-PG (green line) is depicted over time (b) after four HD-MTX and LV courses. This Figure was created using RStudio version 1.1.442