Literature DB >> 3299649

Economic evaluations of antibiotic use and resistance--a perspective: report of Task Force 6.

R H Liss, F R Batchelor.   

Abstract

The economic consequences of antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy for bacterial infections in humans are profound. The reduction in real-dollar terms in the amount of illness and disability resulting from the use of developed and marketed antibiotics far outweighs costs of adverse effects, including resistance. Although bacterial infections continue to cause substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide, standard criteria for assessing the relation of infection to death or the contribution of resistance to mortality and morbidity do not exist. While local outbreaks of resistance may have serious consequences, bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial therapy has remained virtually unchanged nationally where studied. Nevertheless, discriminating use of antimicrobial agents is held widely to be the keystone for minimizing resistance. It is not clear whether risk of selecting resistance is lowered by current community or clinical practices. Some analysts concentrate on the "problem" and "cost" of resistance and forget the benefits of the use of antibiotics. Development of resistance is a natural consequence of antibiotic use, but further quantification of this relation is required. Reports that resistance is increasing worldwide have presented a scientific challenge and economic opportunity to the pharmaceutical industry for the development of new antimicrobial agents. However, if a reasonable rate of return cannot be foreseen, capital for research and development is likely to be invested in areas that appear more financially attractive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3299649     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/9.supplement_3.s297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Infect Dis        ISSN: 0162-0886


  12 in total

1.  Consumption of antibiotics in Sweden, 1975 to 1992: pharmacoeconomic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of antibacterial treatment.

Authors:  P G Davey; M M Malek; S E Parker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Non-prescription antimicrobial use worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel J Morgan; Iruka N Okeke; Ramanan Laxminarayan; Eli N Perencevich; Scott Weisenberg
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Effects of topical erythromycin on ecology of aerobic cutaneous bacterial flora.

Authors:  B R Vowels; D S Feingold; C Sloughfy; A N Foglia; N Konnikov; E Ordoukhanian; P Starkey; J J Leyden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Inaccuracy in the doses of injectable medications dispensed from rubber-stoppered vials.

Authors:  S A Berger; R Porat; A Gorea
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

Authors:  J A Paladino; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Regional variation in the use of antibiotics in four Danish hospitals.

Authors:  H Friis; N Mortensen; H Pinholt; K Schmidt; P Schouenborg; S Waarst
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Antibacterial use in community practice: assessing quantity, indications and appropriateness, and relationship to the development of antibacterial resistance.

Authors:  A G Carrie; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance.

Authors:  I Chopra; M Roberts
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 10.  Economic impact of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  J E McGowan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.