| Literature DB >> 32995091 |
Na Zou1,2, Ling Huang1,2, Huijing Chen1,2, Xiaofeng Huang1,2, Qingni Song1,2, Qingpei Yang1,2, Tianchi Wang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to gain an understanding of the growth response of Phyllostachys edulis (moso bamboo) seedlings to nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) to benefit nutrient management practices and the design of proper fertilizer in nursery cultivation.Entities:
Keywords: Ammonium; Growth response; Nitrate; Nitrogen concentration; Nitrogen form; Phyllostachys edulis; Potassium
Year: 2020 PMID: 32995091 PMCID: PMC7501804 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
L8(4×24) orthogonal array design of nutrient solution composition with the concentrations and forms of N and K.
| Orthogonal combination | K concentration (mmol/L) | N form | N concentration (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | NH4+ | 8 |
| 2 | 0 | NO3− | 32 |
| 3 | 0.5 | NH4+ | 32 |
| 4 | 0.5 | NO3− | 8 |
| 5 | 1.5 | NH4+ | 32 |
| 6 | 1.5 | NO3− | 8 |
| 7 | 3 | NH4+ | 8 |
| 8 | 3 | NO3− | 32 |
N and K on growth, N content, and root architecture of moso bamboo seedlings.
Analytical results are means ± SE (n = 36). Mean values followed by the same letter (a, b, c, d, e, or f) are not significantly different within the same column according to a Duncan’s multiple comparison test at P < 0.05.
| Treatment | Mortality rate/(%) | Height (cm) | Leaf number | SPAD | Biomass (g) | N content (%) | Root length (cm) | Root surface area (cm2) | Root volume (cm3) | Average diameter (cm) | Root tips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.00a | 16.63a | 11.44a | 27.55a | 0.22a | 0.92ab | 292.86a | 30.80a | 0.26a | 0.34ab | 1438.72a |
| 2 | 0.00a | 13.13b | 7.75f | 6.81d | 0.08de | 0.84bc | 117.98cd | 12.34cd | 0.10c | 0.33ab | 612.75cd |
| 3 | 0.00a | 15.70ab | 11.0ab | 20.52c | 0.20a | 0.72bc | 209.02b | 23.81b | 0.22ab | 0.37ab | 915.33b |
| 4 | 0.00a | 14.37ab | 9.50de | 6.49d | 0.12cd | 0.39d | 186.95b | 18.58bc | 0.15bc | 0.32b | 1019.58b |
| 5 | 0.00a | 13.73b | 10.17cd | 21.51bc | 0.14bc | 1.14a | 99.45d | 11.59cd | 0.11c | 0.37a | 393.25d |
| 6 | 0.00a | 14.60ab | 9.00e | 7.59d | 0.11cde | 0.60cd | 176.63bc | 18.13bc | 0.15bc | 0.32ab | 812.17bc |
| 7 | 0.00a | 15.67ab | 10.33bc | 25.42ab | 0.18ab | 0.45d | 196.28b | 21.25b | 0.18b | 0.34ab | 802.50bc |
| 8 | 8.00a | 14.03ab | 7.36f | 5.70d | 0.07e | 0.39d | 77.79d | 8.43d | 0.07c | 0.34ab | 366.22d |
Range analysis of the concentrations and forms of N and K on the growth indices of the seedlings.
R is the range of each factor level (R=Xmax−Xmin); R’ is the adjusted range.
| Range and adjusted range of growth indices | K concentration | N form | N concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSeedling height | 0.87 | 1.40 | 1.17 |
| R’Seedling height | 0.55 | 1.99 | 1.66 |
| RBiomass | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
| R’Biomass | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Rleaf number | 1.40 | 2.33 | 1 |
| R’leaf number | 0.89 | 3.31 | 1.42 |
| RSPADvalue | 3.68 | 17.10 | 3.13 |
| R’SPADvalue | 2.34 | 24.28 | 4.44 |
| RRoot length | 68.39 | 59.57 | 87.12 |
| R’Root length | 43.52 | 84.58 | 123.71 |
| RRoot surface area | 6.73 | 7.50 | 8.15 |
| R’Root surface area | 4.28 | 10.65 | 11.57 |
| RRoot volume | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| R’Root volume | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| RAverage diameter | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| R’Average diameter | 0.004 | 0.043 | 0.028 |
| RRoot tips | 441.38 | 184.77 | 446.35 |
| R’Root tips | 280.89 | 262.37 | 633.82 |
| RN content | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.06 |
| R’N content | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.09 |
Figure 1Effects of N and K on aboveground growth of moso bamboo seedlings.
A to D indicates the variation tendency of seedling height (A), biomass (B), leaf number (C) and SPAD value (D) respectively to different K concentrations, N form and N concentrations.
Variance analysis of the concentrations and forms of N and K on the growth indices of the seedlings.
| Source of variation | The test statistic F | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| K concentration | N form | N concentration | |
| Height | 0.53 | 6.94 | 4.82 |
| Leaf number | 8.65 | 143.16 | 26.29 |
| SPAD value | 2.58 | 307.62 | 10.29 |
| Biomass | 2.70 | 61.25 | 8.26 |
| Root length/(cm) | 7.14 | 18.34 | 39.24 |
| Root surface area/(cm2) | 5.71 | 22.50 | 26.59 |
| Root volume/(cm3) | 3.94 | 22.39 | 14.22 |
| Average diameter/(cm) | 0.16 | 7.72 | 3.42 |
| Root tips | 16.26 | 10.13 | 59.13 |
| Nitrogen content | 18.13 | 21.62 | 11.48 |
Notes.
indicates the significance level at p < 0.05.
indicates the significance level at P < 0.01.
Figure 2Effects of N and K on root system architecture of moso bamboo seedlings.
A to E indicates root system architecture of root total length (A), root surface area (B), root volume (C), average diameter (D) and root tips (E) to different K concentrations, N form and N concentrations.
Figure 3Effects of N and K on N content of moso bamboo seedlings.
Correlation analysis of the growth indices of the seedlings.
| Correlations | Height | Leaf number | SPAD | Biomass | N content | Root length | Root surface | Root volume | Average diameter | Root tips |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Leaf number | .804 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SPAD | .727 | .926 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Biomass | .890 | .975 | .903 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| N content | −0.053 | 0.395 | 0.459 | 0.296 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Root length | .889 | .787 | 0.582 | .827 | 0.042 | 1 | – | – | – | – |
| Root surface | .917 | .832 | 0.653 | .884 | 0.093 | .992 | 1 | – | – | – |
| Root volume | .923 | .880 | .709 | .928 | 0.157 | .966 | .990 | 1 | – | – |
| Average diameter | 0.155 | 0.5 | 0.588 | 0.448 | 0.554 | −0.094 | 0.023 | 0.155 | 1 | – |
| Root tips | .785 | 0.696 | 0.418 | 0.701 | 0.002 | .970 | .939 | .893 | −0.239 | 1 |
Notes.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).