| Literature DB >> 27052002 |
Xinzhang Song1, Honghao Gu1, Meng Wang2, Guomo Zhou1, Quan Li1.
Abstract
Moso bamboo, well known for its high growth rate, is beinpan>g subjected to inpan>creasinpan>g amounts of nitrogen deposition. However, how anthropogenic management practices regulate the effects of N deposition on Moso bamboo stoichiometry remains poorly understood. We observed the effects of two years of simulated N deposition (30, 60 and 90 kg N ha(-1)yr(-1)) on the foliar stoichiometry of Moso bamboo plantations under conventional management (CM) and intensive management (IM). Young bamboo had significantly greater foliar N and P concentrations and N:P ratios than mature plants (P < 0.05). IM significantly increased the foliar N concentrations of young bamboo and P concentrations of mature bamboo but decreased mature bamboo foliar N:P ratios (P < 0.05). Nitrogen increased foliar N and P concentrations in IM bamboo plantations, but the positive effects were diminished when the addition rate exceeded 60 kg N ha(-1)yr(-1). Nitrogen increased foliar N concentrations but aggravated P deficiency in CM bamboo plantations. The positive effects of N deposition on foliar stoichiometry were influenced by management practices and bamboo growth stage. The effects of N deposition on foliar stoichiometry combined with anthropogenic management practices can influence ecosystem production, decomposition, and subsequent N and P cycles in Moso bamboo plantations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27052002 PMCID: PMC4823648 DOI: 10.1038/srep24107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Mature Moso bamboo foliar N (a) and P (c) concentrations and the N:P ratio (e), and young Moso bamboo foliar N (b), and P (d) concentrations and the N:P ratio (f) under different management practices (CM: conventional management; IM: intensive management) and N treatments (control; N30: 30 kg N ha−1yr−1; N60: 60 kg N ha−1yr−1; N90: 90 kg N ha−1yr−1) (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among N addition rates under CM treatments (P < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among N addition rates under IM treatments (P < 0.05). Asterisks indicate significant differences between CM and IM at the same N addition rate (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
The significance level of effects of Moso bamboo growth stage on foliar stoichiometry under different treatments (n = 3, df = 1).
| Treatment | N | P | N:P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | Sig. | F | Sig. | F | Sig. | |
| CM | ||||||
| Control | 343.6 | 48.6 | 80 | |||
| N30 | 410.6 | 7.4 | ns | 81.1 | ||
| N60 | 118.7 | 24.7 | 2.1 | ns | ||
| N90 | 32.9 | 9.3 | 3.5 | ns | ||
| IM | ||||||
| Control | 6225.2 | 0.481 | ns | 115.5 | ||
| N30 | 392.1 | 17.7 | 49.2 | |||
| N60 | 240.8 | 0.05 | ns | 716.8 | ||
| N90 | 523.8 | 22.8 | 76.9 | |||
CM: conventional management; IM: intensive management; N: nitrogen; P: phosphorus. Asterisks indicate that the young bamboo foliar N and P concentrations and N:P ratios are significantly larger than those of mature bamboo (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). ns, no significance.
Pearson correlation coefficients between the foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations of Moso bamboo at different growth stages under conventional management (CM) and intensive management (IM) (n = 12).
| Growth stage | CM | IM |
|---|---|---|
| Mature | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| Young |
*The correlation is significant at the α = 0.05 level.
The significance levels in three-way ANOVA for the effects of management type, N level, bamboo age and their interactions on foliar nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and N:P ratios of Moso bamboo.
| Source of variation | N | P | N:P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | F | Sig. | df | F | Sig. | df | F | Sig. | |
| Management type | 1 | 0.0 | 0.9999 | 1 | 155.1 | 0.0001 | 1 | 151.1 | 0.0001 |
| Bamboo age | 1 | 1889.3 | 0.0001 | 1 | 83.5 | 0.0001 | 1 | 468.9 | 0.0001 |
| N addition level | 3 | 65.6 | 0.0001 | 3 | 15.5 | 0.0001 | 3 | 19.5 | 0.0001 |
| Management × Age | 1 | 87.9 | 0.0001 | 1 | 2.1 | 0.1587 | 1 | 54.3 | 0.0001 |
| Management × N level | 3 | 13.1 | 0.0001 | 3 | 12.4 | 0.0001 | 3 | 2.6 | 0.0656 |
| Age × N level | 3 | 14.6 | 0.0001 | 3 | 2.2 | 0.1122 | 3 | 6.3 | 0.0017 |
| Management × Age × N level | 3 | 9.7 | 0.0001 | 3 | 5.8 | 0.0027 | 3 | 16.8 | 0.0001 |