| Literature DB >> 32992998 |
Matthias Gumpenberger1, Barbara Wessner2, Alexandra Graf3, Marco V Narici4, Christian Fink1,5, Sepp Braun1,5, Christian Hoser1,5, Anthony J Blazevich6, Robert Csapo1.
Abstract
With advancing age, the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix (ECM) undergoes fibrotic changes that may lead to increased muscle stiffness, injury susceptibility and strength loss. This study tested the potential of different exercises to counter these changes by stimulating the activity of genes associated with ECM remodeling. Twenty-six healthy men (66.9 ± 3.9 years) were stratified to two of four groups, performing unilateral (i) conventional resistance exercise, (ii) conventional resistance exercise followed by self-myofascial release (CEBR), (iii) eccentric-only exercise (ECC) or (iv) plyometric jumps (PLY). The non-trained leg served as control. Six hours post-exercise, vastus lateralis muscle biopsy samples were analyzed for the expression of genes associated with ECM collagen synthesis (COL1A1), matrix metallopeptidases (collagen degradation; MMPs) and peptidase inhibitors (TIMP1). Significant between-group differences were found for MMP3, MMP15 and TIMP1, with the greatest responses in MMP3 and TIMP1 seen in CEBR and in MMP15 in ECC. MMP9 (3.24-3.81-fold change) and COL1A1 (1.47-2.40-fold change) were increased in CEBR and PLY, although between-group differences were non-significant. The expression of ECM-related genes is exercise-specific, with CEBR and PLY triggering either earlier or stronger remodeling than other stimuli. Training studies will test whether execution of such exercises may help counter age-associated muscle fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: fibrosis; intramuscular connective tissue; plyometrics; resistance training; sarcopenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32992998 PMCID: PMC7583913 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Anthropometric characteristics, muscle quality and strength by exercise group.
| CE ( | CEBR ( | ECC ( | PLY ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 67.5 ± 4.7 | 67 ± 3.3 | 67.3 ± 4.5 | 65.4 ± 3.7 |
| Height (cm) | 174.5 ± 5.5 | 176.9 ± 4.6 | 176.1 ± 4.8 | 176 ± 4.8 |
| Body mass (kg) | 81.5 ± 13 | 77.4 ± 9.7 | 77.5 ± 9.9 | 76.6 ± 8.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 ± 4.9 | 24.7 ± 2.5 | 24.9 ± 2.5 | 24.7 ± 2.2 |
| MQI (W/kg muscle mass) | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 1.1 | 5.8 ± 1 | 5.4 ± 0.9 |
| 1-RM left (kg) | 57.3 ± 8.8 | 55 ± 5.3 | 58.6 ± 9.5 | 54 ± 7.4 |
| 1-RM right (kg) | 55 ± 7.7 | 53.5 ± 5.3 | 57.3 ± 8.8 | 55.5 ± 6 |
| Rel. 1-RM left (kg/kg body mass) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| Rel. 1-RM right (kg/kg body mass) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
CE: Concentric-eccentric knee extension exercise, CEBR: Concentric-eccentric knee extension exercise followed by foam rolling, ECC: Eccentric knee extension exercise, PLY: Plyometric exercise. MQI: muscle quality index [46]. 1-RM: knee extension one-repetition maximum load. Note that all subjects were stratified by the muscle quality index and then assigned to two out of the four exercise groups.
Expressions of genes by exercise group.
| CE ( | CEBR ( | ECC ( | PLY ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP2 | 1.00 ± 0.26 | 0.87 ± 0.28 | 0.94 ± 0.29 | 0.89 ± 0.19 |
| MMP3 a,b | 0.93 ± 0.69 | 5.25 ± 4.68 | 5.41 ± 11.1 | 0.93 ± 0.52 |
| MMP9 | 0.75 ± 0.38 | 3.81 ± 5.66 | 0.82 ± 0.76 | 3.24 ± 4.05 |
| MMP15 c | 1.29 ± 0.65 | 0.80 ± 0.20 | 1.19 ± 0.58 | 0.92 ± 0.64 |
| COL1A1 | 0.84 ± 0.36 | 2.40 ± 4.08 | 0.88 ± 0.54 | 1.47 ± 1.45 |
| COL7A1 | 0.99 ± 0.25 | 1.07 ± 0.22 | 1.24 ± 0.53 | 1.77 ± 2.06 |
| TIMP1 b | 0.83 ± 0.20 | 1.36 ± 0.46 | 0.99 ± 0.29 | 1.14 ± 0.34 |
| MMP2:COL1A1 c | 1.46 ± 1.02 | 0.80 ± 0.33 | 1.51 ± 1.04 | 0.93 ± 0.51 |
| MMP9:COL1A1 | 0.95 ± 0.34 | 2.72 ± 2.61 | 1.14 ± 1.54 | 3.31 ± 4.39 |
| MMP3:TIMP1 a,b | 1.06 ± 0.79 | 3.49 ± 2.61 | 4.98 ± 9.59 | 0.87 ± 0.57 |
| MMP9:TIMP1 | 0.90 ± 0.35 | 3.09 ± 4.98 | 0.74 ± 0.60 | 2.69 ± 2.97 |
| MMP15:TIMP1 c | 1.68 ± 1.16 | 0.64 ± 0.26 | 1.33 ± 0.79 | 0.98 ± 0.98 |
CE: Concentric-eccentric knee extension exercise, CEBR: Concentric-eccentric knee extension exercise followed by foam rolling, ECC: Eccentric knee extension exercise, PLY: Plyometric exercise. Values are means ± SD of fold-changes in gene activity in the trained versus untrained limb. The superscript indices a–c represent significant differences between CEBR-PLY (a), CE-CEBR (b) and CEBR-ECC (c). All subjects were randomly assigned to two of the four exercise groups.
Figure 1Changes in gene expression six hours after a single bout of unilateral eccentric (ECC, n = 13), plyometric (PLY, n = 12), concentric-eccentric exercise followed by foam rolling (CEBR, n = 12) and conventional concentric-eccentric (CE, n = 12) resistance exercise. Fold-changes were calculated with respect to the untrained limb. Brackets indicate significant between-group differences. Outliers, defined as data points located outside 1.5 times the interquartile range above the upper and below the lower quartile, are indicated by open circles.
Characteristics of the exercise stimuli tested.
| Exercise | Sets | Repetitions | Rest | Intensity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eccentric-Concentric Knee Extension | 3 | 12 | 2′ | 70% 1-RM 1 |
| 2 | Foam Rolling (after 1) | 3 | 10 (30–40 s) | 1’ | Pain threshold |
| 3 | Eccentric Knee Extension | 3 | 12 | 1´ | 70% 1-RM 1 × 1.2 |
| 4 | Plyometric Jumps | 3 | 24 | 2´ | Slope 19–21° |
1 1-RM is the concentric knee extension one-repetition maximum load.
Figure 2Study design. Vastus lateralis biopsies were taken after completion of the two exercise sessions, which were interspersed by a washout period of two weeks. CE is unilateral concentric-eccentric resistance exercise, CEBR concentric-eccentric resistance exercise followed by self-myofascial release using a blackroll®, ECC eccentric-only resistance exercise and PLY plyometric exercise. A standard knee extension device was used for CE, CEBR and ECC. The PLY jumps were performed in a seated position using a commercially available training device.