Literature DB >> 32991701

Training Load and Its Role in Injury Prevention, Part I: Back to the Future.

Franco M Impellizzeri1, Paolo Menaspà, Aaron J Coutts2, Judd Kalkhoven1, Miranda J Menaspà3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this 2-part commentary series is† to explain why we believe our ability to control injury risk by manipulating training load (TL) in its current state is an illusion and why the foundations of this illusion are weak and unreliable. In part 1, we introduce the training process framework and contextualize the role of TL monitoring in the injury-prevention paradigm. In part 2, we describe the conceptual and methodologic pitfalls of previous authors who associated TL and injury in ways that limited their suitability for the derivation of practical recommendations. The first important step in the training process is developing the training program: the practitioner develops a strategy based on available evidence, professional knowledge, and experience. For decades, exercise strategies have been based on the fundamental training principles of overload and progression. Training-load monitoring allows the practitioner to determine whether athletes have completed training as planned and how they have coped with the physical stress. Training load and its associated metrics cannot provide a quantitative indication of whether particular load progressions will increase or decrease the injury risk, given the nature of previous studies (descriptive and at best predictive) and their methodologic weaknesses. The overreliance on TL has moved the attention away from the multifactorial nature of injury and the roles of other important contextual factors. We argue that no evidence supports the quantitative use of TL data to manipulate future training with the purpose of preventing injury. Therefore, determining "how much is too much" and how to properly manipulate and progress TL are currently subjective decisions based on generic training principles and our experience of adjusting training according to an individual athlete's response. Our message to practitioners is to stop seeking overly simplistic solutions to complex problems and instead embrace the risks and uncertainty inherent in the training process and injury prevention. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical reasoning; practice; research methods

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32991701      PMCID: PMC7534945          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-500-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  36 in total

Review 1.  Musculoskeletal adaptations and injuries due to overtraining.

Authors:  W B Kibler; T J Chandler; E S Stracener
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Causation and causal inference in epidemiology.

Authors:  Kenneth J Rothman; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention.

Authors:  Caroline Finch
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  Optimal loading: key variables and mechanisms.

Authors:  Philip Glasgow; Nicola Phillips; Christopher Bleakley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Incorporating subject-specific geometry to compare metatarsal stress during running with different foot strike patterns.

Authors:  M A Ellison; M Kenny; J Fulford; A Javadi; H M Rice
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Training Load and Player Monitoring in High-Level Football: Current Practice and Perceptions.

Authors:  Richard Akenhead; George P Nassis
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.010

7.  Injuries affect team performance negatively in professional football: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study.

Authors:  Martin Hägglund; Markus Waldén; Henrik Magnusson; Karolina Kristenson; Håkan Bengtsson; Jan Ekstrand
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Context Matters: Revisiting the First Step of the 'Sequence of Prevention' of Sports Injuries.

Authors:  Caroline Bolling; Willem van Mechelen; H Roeline Pasman; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Comparison of subsequent injury categorisation (SIC) models and their application in a sporting population.

Authors:  Liam A Toohey; Michael K Drew; Lauren V Fortington; Miranda J Menaspa; Caroline F Finch; Jill L Cook
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-11

10.  Attention to the principles of exercise training in exercise studies on prostate cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Mary E Medysky; Kristin L Campbell; Kelcey A Bland; Kerri M Winters-Stone
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Association Between the Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio and Running-Related Injuries in Dutch Runners: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gustavo Nakaoka; Saulo Delfino Barboza; Evert Verhagen; Willem van Mechelen; Luiz Hespanhol
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Training Load and Injury: Causal Pathways and Future Directions.

Authors:  Judd T Kalkhoven; Mark L Watsford; Aaron J Coutts; W Brent Edwards; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Progression in training volume and perceived psychological and physiological training distress in Norwegian student athletes: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Cathrine Nyhus Hagum; Espen Tønnessen; Shaher A I Shalfawi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Submaximal Fitness Tests in Team Sports: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Physiological State.

Authors:  Tzlil Shushan; Shaun J McLaren; Martin Buchheit; Tannath J Scott; Steve Barrett; Ric Lovell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Understanding 'monitoring' data-the association between measured stressors and athlete responses within a holistic basketball performance framework.

Authors:  Richard A J Mercer; Jennifer L Russell; Lauren C McGuigan; Aaron J Coutts; Donnie S Strack; Blake D McLean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Black Box Prediction Methods in Sports Medicine Deserve a Red Card for Reckless Practice: A Change of Tactics is Needed to Advance Athlete Care.

Authors:  Garrett S Bullock; Tom Hughes; Amelia H Arundale; Patrick Ward; Gary S Collins; Stefan Kluzek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 11.928

7.  Quantification method influences training load change in high school cross-country runners across a competitive season.

Authors:  Micah C Garcia; Brett S Pexa; Kevin R Ford; Mitchell J Rauh; David M Bazett-Jones
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.824

8.  Assessment of External Load During Matches in Two Consecutive Seasons Using the Mediacoach® Video Analysis System in a Spanish Professional Soccer Team: Implications for Injury Prevention.

Authors:  Manuel Alcantarilla-Pedrosa; David Álvarez-Santana; Sergio Hernández-Sánchez; Angel Yañez-Álvarez; Manuel Albornoz-Cabello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Tracking Systems in Team Sports: A Narrative Review of Applications of the Data and Sport Specific Analysis.

Authors:  Lorena Torres-Ronda; Emma Beanland; Sarah Whitehead; Alice Sweeting; Jo Clubb
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 10.  Training Load Monitoring Considerations for Female Gaelic Team Sports: From Theory to Practice.

Authors:  John D Duggan; Jeremy A Moody; Paul J Byrne; Stephen-Mark Cooper; Lisa Ryan
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.