Literature DB >> 32989907

Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Anna Haste1, Mark Lambert2, Linda Sharp3, Richard Thomson4, Sarah Sowden4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health-care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment within the recommended 62 days of referral.
OBJECTIVE: We explored patients' experiences to identify areas for service improvement.
DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients who were referred through the urgent (two-week) GP referral route and were within six months of receiving first treatment were recruited. DATA ANALYSIS: Data from the interviews were analysed thematically.
RESULTS: Four themes were developed: organization of care; diagnosis; support; and views and expectations of the NHS. Patients described cross-cutting issues such as complex and varied pathways and uncertainty about what would happen next. They felt daunted by the intensity and speed of investigations. They were presented with a recommended course of action rather than options and had little involvement in decision making. They were grateful for care, reluctant to complain and resigned to the status quo. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: In order to meet patient needs, the NHS needs to improve communication and streamline pathways. Future cancer pathways also need to be designed to support shared decision making, be truly person-centred and informed by patient experience.
© 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; patient experience; qualitative; service evaluation; urgent pathway

Year:  2020        PMID: 32989907      PMCID: PMC7752202          DOI: 10.1111/hex.13136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  56 in total

Review 1.  Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.

Authors:  Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Greg Rubin; Richard D Neal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Using clinical audit, qualitative data from patients and feedback from general practitioners to decrease delay in the referral of suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Davies; Beverley van der Molen; Amanda Cranston
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Marie Johnston; Clare Robertson; Liz Glidewell; Vikki Entwistle; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-12

4.  Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.

Authors:  Camille Maringe; Sarah Walters; John Butler; Michel P Coleman; Neville Hacker; Louise Hanna; Berit J Mosgaard; Andy Nordin; Barry Rosen; Gerda Engholm; Marianne L Gjerstorff; Juanita Hatcher; Tom B Johannesen; Colleen E McGahan; David Meechan; Richard Middleton; Elizabeth Tracey; Donna Turner; Michael A Richards; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Mark J Rutherford; Aude Bardot; Jacques Ferlay; Therese M-L Andersson; Tor Åge Myklebust; Hanna Tervonen; Vicky Thursfield; David Ransom; Lorraine Shack; Ryan R Woods; Donna Turner; Suzanne Leonfellner; Susan Ryan; Nathalie Saint-Jacques; Prithwish De; Carol McClure; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Heather Stuart-Panko; Gerda Engholm; Paul M Walsh; Christopher Jackson; Sally Vernon; Eileen Morgan; Anna Gavin; David S Morrison; Dyfed W Huws; Geoff Porter; John Butler; Heather Bryant; David C Currow; Sara Hiom; D Max Parkin; Peter Sasieni; Paul C Lambert; Bjørn Møller; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability.

Authors:  Mads Lind Ingeman; Morten Bondo Christensen; Flemming Bro; Søren T Knudsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Management of colorectal cancer explains differences in 1-year relative survival between France and England for patients diagnosed 1997-2004.

Authors:  O Dejardin; B Rachet; E Morris; V Bouvier; V Jooste; R Haynes; E G Coombes; D Forman; A P Jones; A M Bouvier; G Launoy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study.

Authors:  D W Hamilton; B Heaven; R G Thomson; J A Wilson; C Exley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Patient family advisors' perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: Power and partnership.

Authors:  Donna Goodridge; Tanner Isinger; Thomas Rotter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  General practice in UK newspapers: an empirical analysis of over 400 articles.

Authors:  Eleanor Barry; Trish Greenhalgh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Anna Haste; Mark Lambert; Linda Sharp; Richard Thomson; Sarah Sowden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.