Benjamin Darnis1, Kayvan Mohkam2,3, Nicolas Golse4, Eric Vibert4, Daniel Cherqui4, François Cauchy5, Olivier Soubrane5, Jean-Marc Regimbeau6, Jeanne Dembinski6, Jean Hardwigsen7, Philippe Bachelier8, Christophe Laurent9, Stéphanie Truant10, Guillaume Millet10, Mickaël Lesurtel1,11, Emmanuel Boleslawksi10, Jean-Yves Mabrut1,11. 1. Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France. 2. Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France. kayvan.mohkam@chu-lyon.fr. 3. Cancer Research Center of Lyon, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286 Unit, Lyon, France. kayvan.mohkam@chu-lyon.fr. 4. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France. 5. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France. 6. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Amiens, Amiens, France. 7. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Timone, Marseille, France. 8. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 9. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque Bordeaux, Pessac, France. 10. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France. 11. Cancer Research Center of Lyon, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286 Unit, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is nowadays considered as the standard approach for hepatic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), but its value in the prevention of incisional hernia (IH) has not been demonstrated. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLLS) or open LLS (OLLS) in 8 centers were compared. Patients undergoing a simultaneous major abdominal procedure were excluded. The incidence of IH was assessed clinically and morphologically on computed tomography (CT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: After IPTW, 84 LLLS were compared to 48 OLLS. Compared to OLLS, LLLS patients had reduced blood loss (100 [IQR: 50-200] ml vs. 150 [IQR: 50-415] ml, p = 0.023) and shorter median hospital stay (5 [IQR: 4-7] days vs. 7 [6-9] days, p < 0.001), but experienced similar rate of postoperative complications (mean comprehensive complication index: 12 ± 19 after OLLS versus 13 ± 20 after LLLS, p = 0.968). Long-term radiological screening was performed with a median follow-up of 27.4 (12.1-44.9) months. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinically relevant IH (10.7% [n = 9] after LLLS, 8.3% [n = 4] after OLLS, p = 0.768). The rate of IH detected on computed tomography was lower after LLLS than after OLLS (11.9% [n = 10] versus 29.2% [n = 14], p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, the laparoscopic approach was the only independent factor influencing the risk of morphological IH (OR = 0.290 [95% CI: 0.094-0.891], p = 0.031). The 2 preferential sites for specimen extraction after LLLS were Pfannenstiel and midline incisions, with rates of IH across the extraction site of 2.3% [n = 1/44] and 23.8% [n = 5/21], respectively (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach for LLS decreases the risk of long-term IH as evidenced on morphological examinations, with limited clinical impact. Pfannenstiel's incision should be preferred to midline incision for specimen extraction after LLLS.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is nowadays considered as the standard approach for hepatic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), but its value in the prevention of incisional hernia (IH) has not been demonstrated. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLLS) or open LLS (OLLS) in 8 centers were compared. Patients undergoing a simultaneous major abdominal procedure were excluded. The incidence of IH was assessed clinically and morphologically on computed tomography (CT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: After IPTW, 84 LLLS were compared to 48 OLLS. Compared to OLLS, LLLS patients had reduced blood loss (100 [IQR: 50-200] ml vs. 150 [IQR: 50-415] ml, p = 0.023) and shorter median hospital stay (5 [IQR: 4-7] days vs. 7 [6-9] days, p < 0.001), but experienced similar rate of postoperative complications (mean comprehensive complication index: 12 ± 19 after OLLS versus 13 ± 20 after LLLS, p = 0.968). Long-term radiological screening was performed with a median follow-up of 27.4 (12.1-44.9) months. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinically relevant IH (10.7% [n = 9] after LLLS, 8.3% [n = 4] after OLLS, p = 0.768). The rate of IH detected on computed tomography was lower after LLLS than after OLLS (11.9% [n = 10] versus 29.2% [n = 14], p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, the laparoscopic approach was the only independent factor influencing the risk of morphological IH (OR = 0.290 [95% CI: 0.094-0.891], p = 0.031). The 2 preferential sites for specimen extraction after LLLS were Pfannenstiel and midline incisions, with rates of IH across the extraction site of 2.3% [n = 1/44] and 23.8% [n = 5/21], respectively (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach for LLS decreases the risk of long-term IH as evidenced on morphological examinations, with limited clinical impact. Pfannenstiel's incision should be preferred to midline incision for specimen extraction after LLLS.
Authors: Go Wakabayashi; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Joseph F Buell; Hironori Kaneko; Ho Seong Han; Horacio Asbun; Nicholas OʼRourke; Minoru Tanabe; Alan J Koffron; Allan Tsung; Olivier Soubrane; Marcel Autran Machado; Brice Gayet; Roberto I Troisi; Patrick Pessaux; Ronald M Van Dam; Olivier Scatton; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Giulio Belli; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Bjørn Edwin; Gi Hong Choi; Luca Antonio Aldrighetti; Xiujun Cai; Sean Cleary; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Michael R Schön; Atsushi Sugioka; Chung-Ngai Tang; Paulo Herman; Juan Pekolj; Xiao-Ping Chen; Ibrahim Dagher; William Jarnagin; Masakazu Yamamoto; Russell Strong; Palepu Jagannath; Chung-Mau Lo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Norihiro Kokudo; Jeffrey Barkun; Steven M Strasberg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C Goumard; O Farges; A Laurent; D Cherqui; O Soubrane; B Gayet; P Pessaux; F-R Pruvot; O Scatton Journal: J Visc Surg Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 2.043
Authors: Mickael Lesurtel; Daniel Cherqui; Alexis Laurent; Claude Tayar; Pierre Louis Fagniez Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 12.969