Literature DB >> 32986348

Evaluation of Perienhancing Area in Differentiation between Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis.

Jureerat Thammaroj1, Nattha Wongwichit1, Arunnit Boonrod1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate differential diagnosis between glioblastoma and brain metastasis is important. We aimed to differentiate these tumors by evaluation of the perienhancing area.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis were included. The diameters of perienhancing and enhancing areas were measured, and the percentage of enhancing area was calculated. We measured Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of perienhancing and enhancing areas. Intratumoral necrotic areas were measured.
RESULTS: The enhancing area of glioblastoma was 56.61% and metastasis was 42.55% (p = 0.08). The ADC values of the perienhancing part of GBM was 0.7 and metastasis was 0.79 (p = 0.052). The ADC value of the enhancing part of the GBM was 0.82 and metastasis was 0.8 (p-value = 0.72).  The intratumoral necrotic area of glioblastoma (152.25 mm3) was higher than in metastasis (0 mm3) (p-value = 0.003) with a cutoff area of 11.8 mm2.
CONCLUSION: The ADC values of the perienhancing area were lower in glioblastoma with a near-significant p-value. Other perienhancing parameters demonstrated no significant difference between both tumors. The intratumoral necrotic area of glioblastoma is larger than metastasis.<br />.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC ratio; Glioblastoma; intratumoral necrosis; perienhancing area; solitary brain metastasis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32986348      PMCID: PMC7779443          DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.9.2525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  21 in total

1.  Effect of imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient and optimization strategies.

Authors:  Azim Celik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Gradient of apparent diffusion coefficient values in peritumoral edema helps in differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions.

Authors:  Pierre Lemercier; Silvia Paz Maya; James T Patrie; Lucía Flors; Carlos Leiva-Salinas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its recent trend-a survey.

Authors:  Geetha Soujanya Chilla; Cher Heng Tan; Chenjie Xu; Chueh Loo Poh
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-06

4.  Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions.

Authors:  Eun Ja Lee; Karel terBrugge; David Mikulis; Dae Seob Choi; Jong Myon Bae; Seon Kyu Lee; Soon Young Moon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Contribution of the apparent diffusion coefficient in perilesional edema for the assessment of brain tumors.

Authors:  R Guzman; S Altrichter; M El-Koussy; J Gralla; J Weis; A Barth; R W Seiler; G Schroth; K O Lövblad
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.447

6.  Perfusion-weighted imaging of peritumoral edema can aid in the differential diagnosis of glioblastoma mulltiforme versus brain metastasis.

Authors:  Osnat Halshtok Neiman; Siegal Sadetzki; Angela Chetrit; Stephen Raskin; Gal Yaniv; Chen Hoffmann
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Solitary metastases and high-grade gliomas: radiological differentiation by morphometric analysis and perfusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  B Hakyemez; C Erdogan; G Gokalp; A Dusak; M Parlak
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Peritumoral edema shown by MRI predicts poor clinical outcome in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chen-Xing Wu; Guo-Shi Lin; Zhi-Xiong Lin; Jian-Dong Zhang; Shui-Yuan Liu; Chang-Fu Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from metastatic brain tumor using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion metrics at 3 T.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsougos; Patricia Svolos; Evanthia Kousi; Konstantinos Fountas; Kyriaki Theodorou; Ioannis Fezoulidis; Eftychia Kapsalaki
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Neuropathology of brain metastases.

Authors:  Melike Pekmezci; Arie Perry
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.