Literature DB >> 3298559

Mitoxantrone versus doxorubicin in combination chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the breast.

R C Leonard, M A Cornbleet, S B Kaye, M Soukop, G White, A W Hutcheon, S Robinson, M E Kerr, J F Smyth.   

Abstract

One hundred fifteen patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast were treated in a randomized trial of mitoxantrone (Novantrone, Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, NY) combined with vincristine and prednisolone (VMP) or doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) combined with vincristine and prednisolone (VAP). In 100 evaluable patients, the objective response rates were 35% for VMP and 61% for VAP, the complete response rates being 6% and 13%, respectively. In responding patients, median time to progression was 6.2 months for VMP and 7.9 months for VAP. The median survival whether measured from primary diagnosis, first metastasis, or from the start of chemotherapy was similar for both regimens. Toxicity, particularly alopecia, was appreciably lower in the VMP treated patients, but subclinical cardiotoxicity was seen within the scheduled dosage for both combinations. We conclude that VAP is clearly more active, but clinically more toxic than VMP. There is no survival advantage conferred by the more toxic combination. Cardiac toxicity is a potential hazard with either drug combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3298559     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.7.1056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

1.  Advanced breast cancer: a randomized study of doxorubicin or mitoxantrone in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine.

Authors:  J A Green; A J Slater; I R Campbell; V Kelly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Cancer cell spheroids as a model to evaluate chemotherapy protocols.

Authors:  Federico Perche; Vladimir P Torchilin
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  D Faulds; J A Balfour; P Chrisp; H D Langtry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Mitoxantrone plus vinorelbine with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in advanced breast cancer patients. A dose and schedule finding study.

Authors:  G Frasci; G Comella; P Comella; F Salzano; L Cremone; N Della Volpe; A Imbriani; G Persico
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Anthracyclines in the treatment of cancer. An overview.

Authors:  G N Hortobágyi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Postmenopausal breast cancer. Drug therapy in the 1990s.

Authors:  C I Falkson; G Falkson; H C Falkson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for liver metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Arai; Y Sone; Y Inaba; Y Ariyoshi; C Kido
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Alonso; J M Tabernero; B Ojeda; M Llanos; C Solà; M A Climent; M A Seguí; J J López
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.872

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.