Literature DB >> 32982067

Quantifying the effects of surface conveyance of treated wastewater effluent on groundwater, surface water, and nutrient dynamics in a large river floodplain.

Charlotte F Narr1, Harsh Singh2, Paul Mayer3, Ann Keeley2, Bart Faulkner2, Doug Beak2, Kenneth J Forshay2.   

Abstract

Restoration and reconnection of floodplain systems provide multiple societal and ecosystem benefits, while providing municipalities the opportunity to attempt alternative approaches to maintain infrastructure protection and function. In some restored floodplains, treated wastewater effluent discharge is redirected over land instead of directly into rivers to allow natural flow and infiltration, to facilitate restoration designs such as levee setback, and to provide additional freshwater to floodplain ecosystems. However, indirect discharge of treated effluent over land may pose risks to surface and groundwater when pollutants like excess nutrients enter the floodplain and undergo transformation. We investigated the consequences for groundwater and surface water quality when effluent was redirected as open water channels over a floodplain surface. In this study, seasonal floodplain nutrient concentrations in groundwater and surface water were observed for more than 5 years as a floodplain and wastewater treatment plant underwent a major restoration project that included river-floodplain reconnection with levee setback and redirection of effluent discharge from a river channel to open flow across the restored floodplain. Nutrient loading to the surrounding floodplain groundwater and surface water was observed, but based on measures of hydrological connectivity, groundwater flow paths, and biogeochemistry, nutrients from the effluent moved within the floodplain with minimal effect to the surrounding floodplain water quality. We did not find evidence of substantial additional processing that could replace advanced nutrient treatment in this system, however we did observe evidence of diverse nutrient processes that may support enhanced retention if treatment channels were designed to enhance these processes. We suggest that indirect discharge of high quality treated effluent in a restored floodplain is a viable alternative to direct discharge into a river when groundwater flow directs that discharge to habitats where minimal nutrient sensitivity is expected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denitrification; Floodplain restoration; Indirect discharge; Nutrients; Wastewater; Water reuse

Year:  2019        PMID: 32982067      PMCID: PMC7513880          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Eng        ISSN: 0925-8574            Impact factor:   4.035


  16 in total

1.  A dual isotope approach to identify denitrification in groundwater at a river-bank infiltration site.

Authors:  Teppei Fukada; Kevin M Hiscock; Paul F Dennis; Thomas Grischek
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Floodplain restoration enhances denitrification and reach-scale nitrogen removal in an agricultural stream.

Authors:  Sarah S Roley; Jennifer L Tank; Mia L Stephen; Laura T Johnson; Jake J Beaulieu; Jonathan D Witter
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Environmental science. Aging infrastructure and ecosystem restoration.

Authors:  Martin W Doyle; Emily H Stanley; David G Havlick; Mark J Kaiser; George Steinbach; William L Graf; Gerald E Galloway; J Adam Riggsbee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Floodplain restoration increases hyporheic flow in the Yakima River Watershed, Washington.

Authors:  Harsh Vardhan Singh; Barton R Faulkner; Ann A Keeley; Joel Freudenthal; Kenneth J Forshay
Journal:  Ecol Eng       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 5.  Denitrification: ecological niches, competition and survival.

Authors:  J M Tiedje; A J Sexstone; D D Myrold; J A Robinson
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier method.

Authors:  K L Casciotti; D M Sigman; M Galanter Hastings; J K Böhlke; A Hilkert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Eutrophication and bacterial pathogens as risk factors for avian botulism outbreaks in wetlands receiving effluents from urban wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Ibone Anza; Dolors Vidal; Celia Laguna; Sandra Díaz-Sánchez; Sergio Sánchez; Alvaro Chicote; Máximo Florín; Rafael Mateo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics.

Authors:  Thomas Borch; Ruben Kretzschmar; Andreas Kappler; Philippe Van Cappellen; Matthew Ginder-Vogel; Andreas Voegelin; Kate Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Nitrous oxide from soil denitrification: factors controlling its biological production.

Authors:  M K Firestone; R B Firestone; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Environmental factors influencing the prevalence of a Clostridium botulinum type C/D mosaic strain in nonpermanent Mediterranean wetlands.

Authors:  Dolors Vidal; Ibone Anza; Mark A Taggart; Elisa Pérez-Ramírez; Elena Crespo; Ursula Hofle; Rafael Mateo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced streamflow prediction with SWAT using support vector regression for spatial calibration: A case study in the Illinois River watershed, U.S.

Authors:  Lifeng Yuan; Kenneth J Forshay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.