Literature DB >> 3298156

X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation: marsupials, mouse, and man compared.

J L VandeBerg, E S Robinson, P B Samollow, P G Johnston.   

Abstract

The existence of paternal X inactivation in Australian and American marsupial species suggests that this feature of X-chromosome dosage compensation is not a recent adaptation, but probably predates the evolutionary separation of the Australian and American marsupial lineages. Although it is theoretically possible that the marsupial system is one of random X inactivation with p greater than 0.99 and q less than 0.01 and dependent on parental source, no instance of random X inactivation (p = q or p not equal to q) has ever been verified in any tissue or cell type of any marsupial species. Therefore, we conclude that the most fundamental difference in X inactivation of marsupials and eutherians is whether the inactive X is the paternal one or is determined at random (with p = q in most but not all cases). The only other unequivocal difference between eutherians and marsupials is that both X chromosomes are active in mice and human oocytes, but not in kangaroo oocytes. Apparently, the inactive X is reactivated at a later meiotic stage or during early embryogenesis in kangaroos. X-chromosome inactivation takes place early in embryogenesis of eutherians and marsupials. Extraembryonic membranes of mice exhibit paternal X inactivation, whereas those of humans seem to exhibit random X inactivation with p greater than q (i.e., preferential paternal X inactivation). In general, extraembryonic membranes of marsupial exhibit paternal X inactivation, but the Gpd locus is active on both X chromosomes in at least some cells of kangaroo yolk sac. It is difficult to draw any general conclusion because of major differences in embryogeny of mice, humans, and marsupials, and uncertainties in interpreting the data from humans. Other differences between marsupials and eutherians in patterns of X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation seem to be quantitative rather than qualitative. Partial expression of some genes on the inactive X is characteristic of marsupials, with species variation in the behavior of specific loci; some X-linked human genes on the inactive chromosome also are known to exhibit partial activity in vivo and in cultured cells. The X chromosomes of marsupials do not behave as units with respect to transcriptional activity, nor does the human X chromosome. In addition, Barr bodies have recently been detected at interphase in some marsupials, establishing that this manifestation of X chromosome inactivity is not restricted to eutherians.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3298156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isozymes Curr Top Biol Med Res        ISSN: 0160-3787


  13 in total

1.  X chromosome inactivation in female embryos of a marsupial mouse (Antechinus stuartii).

Authors:  P G Johnston; E S Robinson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Specific patterns of histone marks accompany X chromosome inactivation in a marsupial.

Authors:  Edda Koina; Julie Chaumeil; Ian K Greaves; David J Tremethick; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Histone underacetylation is an ancient component of mammalian X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  M J Wakefield; A M Keohane; B M Turner; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The X chromosome of monotremes shares a highly conserved region with the eutherian and marsupial X chromosomes despite the absence of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  J M Watson; J A Spencer; A D Riggs; J A Graves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  X-linked gene expression in metatherian fibroblasts: evidence from the Gpd and Pgk-A loci of the Virginia opossum and the red-necked wallaby.

Authors:  P B Samollow; P G Johnston; A L Ford; J L VandeBerg
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 6.  The X chromosome in development in mouse and man.

Authors:  M Monk
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 7.  The opossum genome: insights and opportunities from an alternative mammal.

Authors:  Paul B Samollow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genes flanking Xist in mouse and human are separated on the X chromosome in American marsupials.

Authors:  Alexander I Shevchenko; Irina S Zakharova; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Nicolay N Kolesnikov; Siobhan Whitehead; Christine Bird; Mark Ross; Jennifer R Weidman; Randy L Jirtle; Tatiana V Karamysheva; Nicolay B Rubtsov; John L VandeBerg; Nina A Mazurok; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Analysis of DNase 1 sensitivity and methylation of active and inactive X chromosomes of kangaroos (Macropus robustus) by in situ nick translation.

Authors:  D A Loebel; P G Johnston
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 10.  X-linked glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and autosomal 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) polymorphisms in baboons.

Authors:  J L VandeBerg; M J Aivaliotis; P B Samollow
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.