Literature DB >> 32980971

Sex differences in the use of spatial cues in two avian brood parasites.

Jimena Lois-Milevicich1, Alex Kacelnik2, Juan Carlos Reboreda3.   

Abstract

Shiny and screaming cowbirds are avian interspecific brood parasites that locate and prospect host nests in daylight and return from one to several days later to lay an egg during the pre-dawn twilight. Thus, during nest location and prospecting, both location information and visual features are available, but the latter become less salient in the low-light conditions when the nests are visited for laying. This raises the question of how these different sources of information interact, and whether this reflects different behavioural specializations across sexes. Differences are expected, because in shiny cowbirds, females act alone, but in screaming cowbirds, both sexes make exploratory and laying nest visits together. We trained females and males of shiny and screaming cowbird to locate a food source signalled by both colour and position (cues associated), and evaluated performance after displacing the colour cue to make it misleading (cues dissociated). There were no sex or species differences in acquisition performance while the cues were associated. When the colour cue was relocated, individuals of both sexes and species located the food source making fewer visits to non-baited wells than expected by chance, indicating that they all retained the position as an informative cue. In this phase, however, shiny cowbird females, but not screaming, outperformed conspecific males, visiting fewer non-baited wells before finding the food location and making straighter paths in the search. These results are consistent with a greater reliance on spatial memory, as expected from the shiny cowbird female's specialization on nest location behaviour.

Keywords:  Brood parasitism; Cognition; Molothrus bonariensis; Molothrus rufoaxillaris; Spatial memory; Spatial orientation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32980971     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01434-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  27 in total

1.  How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension?

Authors:  Simon Benhamou
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Magpies can use local cues to retrieve their food caches.

Authors:  Gesa Feenders; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry.

Authors:  Emily R Gray; Laurie L Bloomfield; Anne Ferrey; Marcia L Spetch; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  What scatter-hoarding animals have taught us about small-scale navigation.

Authors:  Kristy L Gould; Debbie M Kelly; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species (Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus).

Authors:  S J Gaulin; R W FitzGerald; M S Wartell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Female cowbirds have more accurate spatial memory than males.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Danielle A Snow; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Sexual differences in memory in shiny cowbirds.

Authors:  A A Astié; A Kacelnik; J C Reboreda
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Sex differences in memory for landmark arrays in C57BL/J6 mice.

Authors:  Tania J Bettis; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Sexually dimorphic spatial learning in meadow voles Microtus pennsylvanicus and deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus.

Authors:  L A Galea; M Kavaliers; K P Ossenkopp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?

Authors:  Connor T Lambert; Gopika Balasubramanian; Andrés Camacho-Alpízar; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Can we build a neuroecology of innovativeness similar to that pioneered by David Sherry for spatial memory?

Authors:  Louis Lefebvre; Jean-Nicolas Audet
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Assessing sex differences in behavioural flexibility in an endangered bird species: the Southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri).

Authors:  Samara Danel; Nancy Rebout; Lucy Kemp
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.899

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.