Literature DB >> 23526160

Sex differences in memory for landmark arrays in C57BL/J6 mice.

Tania J Bettis1, Lucia F Jacobs.   

Abstract

The most robust sex differences in cognition across polygynous mammalian species are the sex-specific patterns of the use of spatial cues during encoding and orientation. In laboratory rats, wild rodents, and humans, females orient preferentially to the features and arrangement of local landmarks, while males preferentially attend to distant landmarks. Yet this sex-specific pattern is often absent or reversed in the laboratory mouse, a species representing a major laboratory model of neural mechanisms. We explored sex differences in the C57BL/J6 strain of laboratory mouse by employing tasks that were motivated by the natural patterns of exploration. We predicted that such tasks would unmask the predicted default polygynous patterns of cue use by females and males. We used two standard tasks, a novel object recognition task and a five-stage serial object dishabituation task. On the first task, the results showed a female advantage in detecting the novel object, as predicted by prior results from other polygynous species. In the second task, we found, also as predicted, a male advantage in performance when the polarization of the array was distorted and a female advantage in performance when the local array was re-arranged. The pattern of sex-specific advantages in performance in C57BL/J6 mouse is thus concordant with that found in other polygynous mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23526160     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0619-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

1.  Therapeutic Hypothermia Provides Variable Protection against Behavioral Deficits after Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia: A Potential Role for Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor.

Authors:  Johana Diaz; Suleiman Abiola; Nancy Kim; Oliver Avaritt; Debra Flock; Jenny Yu; Frances J Northington; Raul Chavez-Valdez
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Sex differences in the use of spatial cues in two avian brood parasites.

Authors:  Jimena Lois-Milevicich; Alex Kacelnik; Juan Carlos Reboreda
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The ventral hippocampal muscarinic cholinergic system plays a key role in sexual dimorphisms of spatial working memory in rats.

Authors:  Brandon J Hall; Yael Abreu-Villaça; Marty Cauley; Shaqif Junaid; Hannah White; Abtin Kiany; Edward D Levin
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Effects of placental growth factor deficiency on behavior, neuroanatomy, and cerebrovasculature of mice.

Authors:  Vanessa R Kay; Matthew T Rätsep; Lindsay S Cahill; Andrew F Hickman; Bruno Zavan; Margaret E Newport; Jacob Ellegood; Christine L Laliberte; James N Reynolds; Peter Carmeliet; Chandrakant Tayade; John G Sled; B Anne Croy
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Long-Range Respiratory and Theta Oscillation Networks Depend on Spatial Sensory Context.

Authors:  Andrew Sheriff; Guinevere Pandolfi; Vivian S Nguyen; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Focus on females: A less biased approach for studying strategies and mechanisms of memory.

Authors:  Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

7.  Sex Differences in Spatial Memory in Brown-Headed Cowbirds: Males Outperform Females on a Touchscreen Task.

Authors:  Mélanie F Guigueno; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton; David F Sherry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Navigation outside of the box: what the lab can learn from the field and what the field can learn from the lab.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.600

9.  Guppies Show Behavioural but Not Cognitive Sex Differences in a Novel Object Recognition Test.

Authors:  Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato; Marco Dadda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Examining the contribution of histone modification to sex differences in learning and memory.

Authors:  Ashley A Keiser; Marcelo A Wood
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.