Sara Dastmalchian1, Ozden Kilinc1, Louisa Onyewadume2, Charit Tippareddy2, Debra McGivney3, Dan Ma3, Mark Griswold1,3, Jeffrey Sunshine1, Vikas Gulani4, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan5, Andrew E Sloan6,7, Chaitra Badve8. 1. Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 2. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, B1G503, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5030, USA. 5. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Wolstein Research Bldg. 2526, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 6. Departments of Neurosurgery and Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 7. Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 8. Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. chaitra.badve@uhhospitals.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This is a radiomics study investigating the ability of texture analysis of MRF maps to improve differentiation between intra-axial adult brain tumors and to predict survival in the glioblastoma cohort. METHODS: Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) acquisition was performed on 31 patients across 3 groups: 17 glioblastomas, 6 low-grade gliomas, and 8 metastases. Using regions of interest for the solid tumor and peritumoral white matter on T1 and T2 maps, second-order texture features were calculated from gray-level co-occurrence matrices and gray-level run length matrices. Selected features were compared across the three tumor groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each feature. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis with log rank tests. RESULTS: Low-grade gliomas and glioblastomas had significantly higher run percentage, run entropy, and information measure of correlation 1 on T1 than metastases (p < 0.017). The best separation of all three tumor types was seen utilizing inverse difference normalized and homogeneity values for peritumoral white matter in both T1 and T2 maps (p < 0.017). In solid tumor T2 maps, lower values in entropy and higher values of maximum probability and high-gray run emphasis were associated with longer survival in glioblastoma patients (p < 0.05). Several texture features were associated with longer survival in glioblastoma patients on peritumoral white matter T1 maps (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Texture analysis of MRF-derived maps can improve our ability to differentiate common adult brain tumors by characterizing tumor heterogeneity, and may have a role in predicting outcomes in patients with glioblastoma.
PURPOSE: This is a radiomics study investigating the ability of texture analysis of MRF maps to improve differentiation between intra-axial adult brain tumors and to predict survival in the glioblastoma cohort. METHODS: Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) acquisition was performed on 31 patients across 3 groups: 17 glioblastomas, 6 low-grade gliomas, and 8 metastases. Using regions of interest for the solid tumor and peritumoral white matter on T1 and T2 maps, second-order texture features were calculated from gray-level co-occurrence matrices and gray-level run length matrices. Selected features were compared across the three tumor groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each feature. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis with log rank tests. RESULTS: Low-grade gliomas and glioblastomas had significantly higher run percentage, run entropy, and information measure of correlation 1 on T1 than metastases (p < 0.017). The best separation of all three tumor types was seen utilizing inverse difference normalized and homogeneity values for peritumoral white matter in both T1 and T2 maps (p < 0.017). In solid tumor T2 maps, lower values in entropy and higher values of maximum probability and high-gray run emphasis were associated with longer survival in glioblastomapatients (p < 0.05). Several texture features were associated with longer survival in glioblastomapatients on peritumoral white matter T1 maps (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Texture analysis of MRF-derived maps can improve our ability to differentiate common adult brain tumors by characterizing tumor heterogeneity, and may have a role in predicting outcomes in patients with glioblastoma.
Authors: Jacob A Miller; Elizabeth E Bennett; Roy Xiao; Rupesh Kotecha; Samuel T Chao; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Lilyana Angelov; Erin S Murphy; Jennifer S Yu; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; John H Suh; Alireza M Mohammadi Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andrea Sottoriva; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sara G M Piccirillo; Anestis Touloumis; V Peter Collins; John C Marioni; Christina Curtis; Colin Watts; Simon Tavaré Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Howard Colman; Li Zhang; Erik P Sulman; J Matthew McDonald; Nasrin Latif Shooshtari; Andreana Rivera; Sonya Popoff; Catherine L Nutt; David N Louis; J Gregory Cairncross; Mark R Gilbert; Heidi S Phillips; Minesh P Mehta; Arnab Chakravarti; Christopher E Pelloski; Krishna Bhat; Burt G Feuerstein; Robert B Jenkins; Ken Aldape Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Thierry Gorlia; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Michael Weller; Johan M Kros; Johannes A Hainfellner; Warren Mason; Luigi Mariani; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Peter Hau; René O Mirimanoff; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert C Janzer; Roger Stupp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Olya Grove; Anders E Berglund; Matthew B Schabath; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; Hua Wang; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Philippe Lambin; Yuhua Gu; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Edward Eikman; Robert A Gatenby; Steven Eschrich; Robert J Gillies Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Elisabeth Springer; Pedro Lima Cardoso; Bernhard Strasser; Wolfgang Bogner; Matthias Preusser; Georg Widhalm; Mathias Nittka; Gregor Koerzdoerfer; Pavol Szomolanyi; Gilbert Hangel; Johannes A Hainfellner; Wolfgang Marik; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Darius Kalasauskas; Michael Kosterhon; Naureen Keric; Oliver Korczynski; Andrea Kronfeld; Florian Ringel; Ahmed Othman; Marc A Brockmann Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Bjoern H Menze; Marion I Menzel; Juan A Hernandez-Tamames; Carolin M Pirkl; Laura Nunez-Gonzalez; Florian Kofler; Sebastian Endt; Lioba Grundl; Mohammad Golbabaee; Pedro A Gómez; Matteo Cencini; Guido Buonincontri; Rolf F Schulte; Marion Smits; Benedikt Wiestler Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 2.804