Literature DB >> 32979023

The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.

Michele Hilton Boon1, Hilary Thomson1.   

Abstract

Effect direction (evidence to indicate improvement, deterioration, or no change in an outcome) can be used as a standardized metric which enables the synthesis of diverse effect measures in systematic reviews. The effect direction (ED) plot was developed to support the synthesis and visualization of effect direction data. Methods for the ED plot require updating in light of new Cochrane guidance on alternative synthesis methods. To update the ED plot, statistical significance was removed from the algorithm for within-study synthesis and use of a sign test was considered to examine whether patterns of ED across studies could be due to chance alone. The revised methods were applied to an existing Cochrane review of the health impacts of housing improvements. The revised ED plot provides a method of data visualization in synthesis without meta-analysis that incorporates information about study characteristics and study quality, using ED as a common metric, without relying on statistical significance to combine outcomes of single studies. The results of sign tests, when appropriate, suggest caution in over-interpreting apparent patterns in effect direction, especially when the number of included studies is small. The revised ED plot meets the need for alternative methods of synthesis and data visualization when meta-analysis is not possible, enabling a transparent link between the data and conclusions of a systematic review. ED plots may be particularly useful in reviews that incorporate nonrandomized studies, complex systems approaches, and diverse sources of evidence, due to the variety of study designs and outcomes in such reviews.
© 2020 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data visualization; effect direction; standardized metric; synthesis; vote counting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32979023      PMCID: PMC7821279          DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   9.308


  13 in total

Review 1.  Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

Authors:  J A Sterne; G Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-27

2.  Synthesizing Evidence in Public Policy Contexts: The Challenge of Synthesis When There Are Only a Few Studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Valentine; Sandra Jo Wilson; David Rindskopf; Timothy S Lau; Emily E Tanner-Smith; Martha Yeide; Robin LaSota; Lisa Foster
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  José A López-López; Matthew J Page; Mark W Lipsey; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.273

4.  Misuse of the sign test in narrative synthesis of evidence.

Authors:  Stavros Nikolakopoulos
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.273

Review 5.  An exploration of synthesis methods in public health evaluations of interventions concludes that the use of modern statistical methods would be beneficial.

Authors:  Felix Achana; Stephanie Hubbard; Alex Sutton; Denise Kendrick; Nicola Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The effect direction plot: visual display of non-standardised effects across multiple outcome domains.

Authors:  Hilary J Thomson; Sian Thomas
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 5.273

7.  The albatross plot: A novel graphical tool for presenting results of diversely reported studies in a systematic review.

Authors:  Sean Harrison; Hayley E Jones; Richard M Martin; Sarah J Lewis; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect.

Authors:  M Hassan Murad; Reem A Mustafa; Holger J Schünemann; Shahnaz Sultan; Nancy Santesso
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2017-03-20

9.  Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mhairi Campbell; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Amanda Sowden; Hilary Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  The harvest plot: a method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions.

Authors:  David Ogilvie; Debra Fayter; Mark Petticrew; Amanda Sowden; Sian Thomas; Margaret Whitehead; Gill Worthy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Acute Effects of Exercising in Air Pollution: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Andy Hung; Hannah Nelson; Michael S Koehle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 2.  Effects of β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation on muscle mass, function, and other outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carla M Prado; Camila E Orsso; Suzette L Pereira; Philip J Atherton; Nicolaas E P Deutz
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 12.063

3.  International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.

Authors:  Jacob Burns; Ani Movsisyan; Jan M Stratil; Renke Lars Biallas; Michaela Coenen; Karl Mf Emmert-Fees; Karin Geffert; Sabine Hoffmann; Olaf Horstick; Michael Laxy; Carmen Klinger; Suzie Kratzer; Tim Litwin; Susan Norris; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Peter von Philipsborn; Kerstin Sell; Julia Stadelmaier; Ben Verboom; Stephan Voss; Katharina Wabnitz; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-25

4.  Work Exposures and Development of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christian Moretti Anfossi; Magdalena Ahumada Muñoz; Christian Tobar Fredes; Felipe Pérez Rojas; Jamie Ross; Jenny Head; Annie Britton
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.779

5.  Smartphone-Based Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior and Promote Physical Activity Using Integrated Dynamic Models: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Reza Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; David Dunstan; Jenna McVicar; Mohamed Abdelrazek; Ralph Maddison
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  The Effects of Peanuts and Tree Nuts on Lipid Profile in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled-Feeding Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Jia-Yue Xia; Jun-Hui Yu; Deng-Feng Xu; Chao Yang; Hui Xia; Gui-Ju Sun
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Online synchronous chat counselling for young people aged 12-25: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Maria Tibbs; Aileen O'Reilly; Maeve Dwan O'Reilly; Amanda Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Workplace interventions for cardiovascular diseases: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christian Moretti Anfossi; Christian Tobar Fredes; Felipe Pérez Rojas; Francisca Cisterna Cid; Christian Siques Urzúa; Jamie Ross; Jenny Head; Annie Britton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 9.  Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.

Authors:  Sadia Janjua; Pippa Powell; Richard Atkinson; Elizabeth Stovold; Rebecca Fortescue
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-09

10.  The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.

Authors:  Michele Hilton Boon; Hilary Thomson
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.