| Literature DB >> 32977609 |
Bo-Ram Kim1,2, Sunil Babu Paudel3, Joo-Won Nam3, Chang Hyun Jin1, Ik-Soo Lee2, Ah-Reum Han1.
Abstract
A new polyacetylene glycoside, (5R)-6E-tetradecene-8,10,12-triyne-1-ol-5-O-β-glucoside (1), was isolated from the flower of Coreopsis lanceolata (Compositae), together with two known compounds, bidenoside C (10) and (3S,4S)-5E-trideca-1,5-dien-7,9,11-triyne-3,4-diol-4-O-β-glucopyranoside (11), which were found in Coreopsis species for the first time. The other known compounds, lanceoletin (2), 3,2'-dihydroxy-4-3'-dimethoxychalcone-4'-glucoside (3), 4-methoxylanceoletin (4), lanceolin (5), leptosidin (6), (2R)-8-methoxybutin (7), luteolin (8) and quercetin (9), were isolated in this study and reported previously from this plant. The structure of 1 was elucidated by analyzing one-dimensional and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and high resolution-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry data. All compounds were tested for their dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory activity and compounds 2-4, 6 and 7 inhibited DPP-IV activity in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values from 9.6 to 64.9 μM. These results suggest that C. lanceolata flower and its active constituents show potential as therapeutic agents for diseases associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: Coreopsis lanceolata; dipeptidyl peptidase IV; flavonoid; polyacetylene glycoside; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32977609 PMCID: PMC7582822 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds isolated from the ethyl acetate-soluble fraction of Coreopsis lanceolata.
1H-NMR (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) spectral data (DMSO-d6, δ in ppm) of 1 isolated from Coreopsis lanceolata.
| Position | 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| δH | δC | HMBC (carbon no.) | |
| 1 | 3.33 (2H, dd, | 61.1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1.35 (2H, dd, | 32.8 | 4 |
| 3 | 1.28 (2H, dd, | 21.7 | 5 |
| 4 | 1.45 (2H, dd, | 35.1 | 6 |
| 5 | 4.26 (1H, ddd, | 76.5 | 1′, 7 |
| 6 | 6.39 (1H, | 151.4 | 8 |
| 7 | 6.06 (1H, dd, | 108.6 | 9, 10 |
| 8 | 75.5 | ||
| 9 | 74.0 | ||
| 10 | 59.0 | ||
| 11 | 67.4 | ||
| 12 | 64.6 | ||
| 13 | 81.3 | ||
| 14 | 2.02 (3H, s) | 4.6 | 10, 11, 12 |
| 1′ | 4.00 (1H, d, | 101.3 | 5, 6 |
| 2′ | 2.92 (1H, dd, | 74.0 | |
| 3′ | 3.07 (1H, dd, | 77.3 | |
| 4′ | 2.99 (1H, m) | 70.6 | |
| 5′ | 2.99 (1H, m) | 77.4 | |
| 6′ | 3.38 (1H, m) | 61.7 | |
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY (–), 1H-1H NOESY (----), and 1H-13C HMBC (→) correlations of 1.
Figure 3Effects of compounds 2–4, 6 and 7 on DPP-IV activity. Values are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.