| Literature DB >> 32977432 |
Junlin Liu1,2, Peng Liu3, Fenglin Feng1,2, Junxuan Zhang1,2, Fulin Li1,2, Mianzhi Wang1,2, Yongxue Sun1,2.
Abstract
The increase in antimicrobial resistance is a threat to both human and animal health. The transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) via plasmids has been studied in detail whereas the contribution of bacteriophage-mediated ARG transmission is relatively little explored. We isolated and characterized two T7-like lytic bacteriophages that infected multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli hosts. The morphology and genomic analysis indicated that both phage HZP2 and HZ2R8 were evolutionarily related and their genomes did not encode ARGs. However, ARG-like raw reads were detected in offspring sequencing data with a different abundance level implying that potential ARG packaging had occurred. PCR results demonstrated that six fragments of genes (qnrS, cmlA, tetM, blaTEM, sul3, mcr-1) were potentially packaged by phage HZP2 and four (qnrS, cmlA, blaTEM, mcr-1) by phage HZ2R8. Further quantitative results showed that ARG abundance hierarchies were similar. The gene blaTEM was the most abundant (up to 1.38 × 107 copies/mL) whereas cmlA and qnrS were the least. Moreover, the clinically important mcr-1 gene was the second most abundant ARG indicating a possibility for spread through generalized transduction. Together, our results indicated that these structurally similar phage possessed similar characteristics and potential packaging during phage-host interaction displayed an ARG preference rather than occurring randomly.Entities:
Keywords: T7-like phage; antibiotic resistance genes (ARG); phage-host interaction; potential packaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32977432 PMCID: PMC7598189 DOI: 10.3390/v12101060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Isolated of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8. (A) Plaque morphology of phage HZP2. (B) Plaque morphology of phage HZ2R8. (C) Transmission electron microscopy of phage HZP2, where the scale bar represented 100 nm. (D) Transmission electron microscopy of phage HZ2R8, where the scale bar represented 50 nm.
Figure 2General features of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8. (A) Thermal stability test of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8. (B) pH stability test of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8. (C) Multiplicity of infection (MOI) experiments of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8. (D) One step-growth cure of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8.
Figure 3Map of the genome organization of phage HZP2 (A) and HZ2R8 (B). Different colors in the first circle represented putative open reading frames (ORFs) with different functions. Red represented DNA replication and regulation modules, blue represented packaging and structural modules, yellow represented lysis modules, pink represented host function inhibition modules, and gray represented hypothetical proteins modules. The second circle showed the G/C content: outward indicated that the G/C content of the region was higher than the average G/C content of the whole genome, and inward indicated that G/C content of the region was less than the average; The third circle showed the GC skew. Green outward indicated the area G > C, and pink inward indicated G < C.
Figure 4ORF-by-ORF comparison of the genomes of phage HZP2 and HZ2R8 and other homologous phages. The functional modules indicated by color. Similarities were showed in gray according to the scale on the left side.
Figure 5(A) Phylogenetic tree of various phages based on large terminase subunit. (B) Phylogenetic tree of various phages based on DNA polymerase.
Figure 6The potential packaging of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in phage HZP2 (A) and HZ2R8 (B). Data are from three independent cultures, and one standard deviation is shown. Significant changes were marked with two asterisks for p < 0.05, otherwise marked with one asterisk.
Target ARG results of hosts and phage.
| Gene | Size (bp) | HZA135 | HZA50 | HZP2 | HZ2R8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 247(28.7%) | + | + | + | + |
| 752(87.3%) | + | + | − | − | |
|
| 428 (65.1%) | + | + | + | + |
| 619 (94.2%) | + | + | − | − | |
|
| 158 (12.5%) | + | + | + | + |
| 1188 (94.3%) | + | + | − | − | |
|
| 220 (13.5%) | + | + | + | + |
| 1495 (92.0%) | + | + | − | − | |
|
| 171 (8.9%) | + | + | + | − |
| 1861 (96.9%) | + | − | − | − | |
|
| 128 (16.1%) | + | − | + | − |
| 714 (90.3%) | + | − | − | − | |
|
| 189 (25.6%) | + | − | − | − |
+: Positive. −: Negative. The content in brackets represents the percentage to full-length gene.