Literature DB >> 16414376

Examination of GyE system for HIMAC carbon therapy.

Tatsuaki Kanai1, Naruhiro Matsufuji, Tadaaki Miyamoto, Junetsu Mizoe, Tadashi Kamada, Hiroshi Tsuji, Hirotoshi Kato, Masayuki Baba, Hirohiko Tsujii.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis was made to examine appropriateness in the estimation of the biologic effectiveness of carbon-ion radiotherapy using resultant data from clinical trials at the heavy-ion medical accelerator complex (HIMAC) at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Chiba, Japan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At HIMAC, relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) values of therapeutic carbon beams were determined based on experimental results of cell responses, on values expected with the linear-quadratic model, and based on experiences with neutron therapy. We use fixed RBE values independent of dose levels, although this apparently contradicts radiobiologic observations. Our RBE system depends only on LET of the heavy-ion radiation fields. With this RBE system, over 2,000 patients have been treated by carbon beams. With data from these patients, the local control rate of non-small-cell lung cancer was analyzed to verify the clinical RBE of the carbon beam. The local control rate was compared with rates published by groups from Gunma University and Massachusetts General Hospital. Using a simplified tumor control probability (TCP) model, clinical RBE values were obtained for different levels of TCP.
RESULTS: For the 50% level of the clinical TCP, the RBE values nearly coincide with those for in vitro human salivary gland cell survival at 10%. For the higher levels of clinical TCP, the RBE values approach closer to those adapted in clinical trials at HIMAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414376     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  39 in total

Review 1.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Preliminary study of apparent diffusion coefficient assessment after ion beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masayuki Kanamoto; Tosiaki Miyati; Kazuki Terashima; Daisaku Suga; Nobukazu Fuwa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-04-07

3.  Impact of treatment planning with deformable image registration on dose distribution for carbon-ion beam lung treatment using a fixed irradiation port and rotating couch.

Authors:  M Kumagai; S Mori; N Yamamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Dosimetric Comparison Between Carbon-ion Radiotherapy and Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Takakusagi; Daisaku Yoshida; Yohsuke Kusano; Kio Kano; Wataru Anno; Keisuke Tsuchida; Nobutaka Mizoguchi; Itsuko Serizawa; Hiroyuki Katoh; Koh Imura; Yoshiki Takayama; Shinichi Minohara; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Microdosimetric calculation of penumbra for biological dose in wobbled carbon-ion beams with Monte Carlo Method.

Authors:  Mikoto Tamura; Masataka Komori; Hiroshi Oguchi; Yasushi Iwamoto; Toshiya Rachi; Kenji Ota; Atsushi Hemmi; Tomohiro Shimozato; Yasunori Obata
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-04-25

Review 6.  Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tuan; Viviana Vitolo; Barbara Vischioni; Alberto Iannalfi; Maria Rosaria Fiore; Piero Fossati; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Uptake decrease of proliferative PET tracer 18FLT in bone marrow after carbon ion therapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Koizumi; Tsuneo Saga; Masayuki Inubushi; Toshimitsu Fukumura; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Naoyoshi Yamamoto; Mio Nakajima; Toshio Sugane; Masayuki Baba
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Physical and biological beam modeling for carbon beam scanning at Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujitaka; Yusuke Fujii; Hideaki Nihongi; Satoshi Nakayama; Masaaki Takashina; Noriaki Hamatani; Toshiro Tsubouchi; Masashi Yagi; Kazumasa Minami; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Junetsu Mizoe; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Changes in arrhythmogenic properties and five-year prognosis after carbon-ion radiotherapy in patients with mediastinum cancer.

Authors:  Mari Amino; Koichiro Yoshioka; Makiyoshi Shima; Tohru Okada; Mio Nakajima; Yoshiya Furusawa; Shigetaka Kanda; Sadaki Inokuchi; Teruhisa Tanabe; Yuji Ikari; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Vicki T Taasti; Andrew Jackson; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.