Literature DB >> 32976062

One Algorithm May Not Fit All: How Selection Bias Affects Machine Learning Performance.

Alice C Yu1, John Eng1.   

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in identifying and categorizing disease on radiologic images. Despite the results of initial research studies that report ML algorithm diagnostic accuracy similar to or exceeding that of radiologists, the results are less impressive when the algorithms are installed at new hospitals and are presented with new images. This phenomenon is potentially the result of selection bias in the data that were used to develop the ML algorithm. Selection bias has long been described by clinical epidemiologists as a key consideration when designing a clinical research study, but this concept has largely been unaddressed in the medical imaging ML literature. The authors discuss the importance of selection bias and its relevance to ML algorithm development to prepare the radiologist to critically evaluate ML literature for potential selection bias and understand how it might affect the applicability of ML algorithms in real clinical environments. ©RSNA, 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32976062     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  9 in total

1.  External Validation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Radiologic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice C Yu; Bahram Mohajer; John Eng
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Deep learning for emergency ascites diagnosis using ultrasonography images.

Authors:  Zhanye Lin; Zhengyi Li; Peng Cao; Yingying Lin; Fengting Liang; Jiajun He; Libing Huang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  FPI Based Hyperspectral Imager for the Complex Surfaces-Calibration, Illumination and Applications.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Raita-Hakola; Leevi Annala; Vivian Lindholm; Roberts Trops; Antti Näsilä; Heikki Saari; Annamari Ranki; Ilkka Pölönen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Jaeil Kim; Hye Jung Kim; Chanho Kim; Won Hwa Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-11-12

5.  Diabetic Macular Edema Screened by Handheld Smartphone-based Retinal Camera and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Fernando Korn Malerbi; Giovana Mendes; Nathan Barboza; Paulo Henrique Morales; Roseanne Montargil; Rafael Ernane Andrade
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Possible Bias in Supervised Deep Learning Algorithms for CT Lung Nodule Detection and Classification.

Authors:  Nikos Sourlos; Jingxuan Wang; Yeshaswini Nagaraj; Peter van Ooijen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  [Construction of a Standard Dataset for Liver Tumors for Testing the Performance and Safety of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems].

Authors:  Seung-Seob Kim; Dong Ho Lee; Min Woo Lee; So Yeon Kim; Jaeseung Shin; Jin-Young Choi; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-08-05

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence Advances in the World of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Bhakti Patel; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14

9.  The Trials and Tribulations of Assembling Large Medical Imaging Datasets for Machine Learning Applications.

Authors:  Kirti Magudia; Christopher P Bridge; Katherine P Andriole; Michael H Rosenthal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.