Darren R Feldman1,2, Yasser Ged1, Chung-Han Lee1,2, Andrea Knezevic3, Ana M Molina2, Ying-Bei Chen4, Joshua Chaim5, Devyn T Coskey1, Samuel Murray1, Satish K Tickoo4, Victor E Reuter4, Sujata Patil3, Han Xiao6, Jahan Aghalar7, Arlyn J Apollo8, Maria I Carlo1,2, Robert J Motzer1,2, Martin H Voss1,2. 1. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Basking Ridge, New Jersey. 7. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Commack, New York. 8. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Center at Rockville Center, Woodmere, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported on a phase 2 study of everolimus plus bevacizumab across various nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) histologies and observed encouraging activity among patients with papillary RCC (pRCC) and unclassified RCC (uRCC) with a major papillary component. We subsequently expanded the study to enroll additional patients with pRCC variants. METHODS: Everolimus plus bevacizumab was administered at standard doses until disease progression or intolerance to therapy. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Correlative analyses included next-generation sequencing (NGS) from tumor and germline across >341 genes of interest. RESULTS: In addition to 19 patients with pRCC variants in the original cohort, 20 patients with similar features were enrolled on the expansion cohort (uRCC with papillary features [n = 24], pRCC [n = 14], and translocation-associated RCC with papillary features [n = 1]). Among 37 evaluable patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 78%, the median PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.4 months), and the ORR was 35%. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, the median OS was 33.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-71.9). Tolerance was consistent with prior reports for everolimus plus bevacizumab. NGS results (n = 33) identified responses in patients with a wide spectrum of genomic alterations, including ARID1A, FH, and MET mutations. CONCLUSION: The expansion cohort results confirm robust activity of everolimus plus bevacizumab in metastatic pRCC variants, supporting this regimen as a standard option for this patient population.
BACKGROUND: We previously reported on a phase 2 study of everolimus plus bevacizumab across various nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) histologies and observed encouraging activity among patients with papillary RCC (pRCC) and unclassified RCC (uRCC) with a major papillary component. We subsequently expanded the study to enroll additional patients with pRCC variants. METHODS: Everolimus plus bevacizumab was administered at standard doses until disease progression or intolerance to therapy. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Correlative analyses included next-generation sequencing (NGS) from tumor and germline across >341 genes of interest. RESULTS: In addition to 19 patients with pRCC variants in the original cohort, 20 patients with similar features were enrolled on the expansion cohort (uRCC with papillary features [n = 24], pRCC [n = 14], and translocation-associated RCC with papillary features [n = 1]). Among 37 evaluable patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 78%, the median PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.4 months), and the ORR was 35%. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, the median OS was 33.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-71.9). Tolerance was consistent with prior reports for everolimus plus bevacizumab. NGS results (n = 33) identified responses in patients with a wide spectrum of genomic alterations, including ARID1A, FH, and MET mutations. CONCLUSION: The expansion cohort results confirm robust activity of everolimus plus bevacizumab in metastatic pRCC variants, supporting this regimen as a standard option for this patient population.
Authors: Andrew J Armstrong; Susan Halabi; Tim Eisen; Samuel Broderick; Walter M Stadler; Robert J Jones; Jorge A Garcia; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Joel Picus; Robert E Hawkins; John D Hainsworth; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Theodore F Logan; Igor Puzanov; Lisa M Pickering; Christopher W Ryan; Andrew Protheroe; Christine M Lusk; Sadie Oberg; Daniel J George Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Martin H Voss; Ana M Molina; Ying-Bei Chen; Kaitlin M Woo; Joshua L Chaim; Devyn T Coskey; Almedina Redzematovic; Patricia Wang; William Lee; S Duygu Selcuklu; Chung-Han Lee; Michael F Berger; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Sujata Patil; James J Hsieh; Robert J Motzer; Darren R Feldman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John D Hainsworth; David R Spigel; Howard A Burris; David Waterhouse; Bobby L Clark; Robert Whorf Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nizar M Tannir; Eric Jonasch; Laurence Albiges; Emre Altinmakas; Chaan S Ng; Surena F Matin; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; Zita Dubauskas Lim; Pheroze Tamboli; Priya Rao; Kanishka Sircar; Jose A Karam; David F McDermott; Christopher G Wood; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ana M Molina; Darren R Feldman; Michelle S Ginsberg; Glenn Kroog; Satish K Tickoo; Xiaoyu Jia; Murielle Georges; Sujata Patil; Michael S Baum; Victor E Reuter; Robert J Motzer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Arnoud J Templeton; Ignacio Duran; Alberto Ocana; Paulo de Gouveia; Priya Aneja; Jennifer J Knox; Ian F Tannock; Bernard Escudier; Eitan Amir Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Chung-Han Lee; Martin H Voss; Maria Isabel Carlo; Ying-Bei Chen; Mark Zucker; Andrea Knezevic; Robert A Lefkowitz; Natalie Shapnik; Chloe Dadoun; Ed Reznik; Neil J Shah; Colette Ngozi Owens; Deaglan Joseph McHugh; David Henry Aggen; Andrew Leonard Laccetti; Ritesh Kotecha; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Jack P Gleeson; Ines Nikolovski; Renzo Dinatale; Mark Zucker; Andrea Knezevic; Sujata Patil; Yasser Ged; Ritesh R Kotecha; Natalie Shapnik; Samuel Murray; Paul Russo; Jonathan Coleman; Chung Han Lee; Zsofia K Stadler; A Ari Hakimi; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer; Ed Reznik; Martin H Voss; Ying-Bei Chen; Maria I Carlo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 12.531