Nizar M Tannir1, Eric Jonasch2, Laurence Albiges3, Emre Altinmakas4, Chaan S Ng4, Surena F Matin5, Xuemei Wang6, Wei Qiao6, Zita Dubauskas Lim2, Pheroze Tamboli7, Priya Rao7, Kanishka Sircar7, Jose A Karam5, David F McDermott8, Christopher G Wood5, Toni K Choueiri3. 1. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: ntannir@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 7. Pathology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 8. Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Sunitinib and everolimus are standard first-line and second-line therapies, respectively, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a randomized phase 2 trial comparing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with metastatic, non-ccRCC, or ccRCC with >20% sarcomatoid features (ccSRCC) were randomized to receive sunitinib or everolimus with crossover at disease progression. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy; 108 patients were needed to show improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 12 wk with sunitinib to 20 wk with everolimus. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Interim analysis of 68 patients (papillary [27], chromophobe [12], unclassified [10], translocation [7], ccSRCC [12]) prompted early trial closure. The mPFS in first-line therapy was 6.1 mo with sunitinib and 4.1 mo with everolimus (p=0.6); median overall survival (mOS) was not reached with sunitinib and was 10.5 mo with everolimus, respectively (p=0.014). At final analysis, mOS was 16.2 and 14.9 mo with sunitinib and everolimus, respectively (p=0.18). There were four partial responses (PRs) in first-line therapy (sunitinib: 3 of 33 [9%]; everolimus, 1 of 35 [2.8%]) and four PRs in second-line therapy (sunitinib: 2 of 21 [9.5%]; everolimus, 2 of 23 [8.6%]), with mPFS of 1.8 mo and 2.8 mo, respectively. In patients without sarcomatoid features in their tumors (n=49), mOS was 31.6 mo with sunitinib and 10.5 mo with everolimus (p=0.075). Genomic profiling of a chromophobe RCC from a patient with a PR to first-line everolimus revealed a somatic TSC2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, everolimus was not superior to sunitinib. Both agents demonstrated modest efficacy, underscoring the need for better therapies in non-ccRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This randomized phase 2 trial provides the first head-to-head comparison of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). The observed very modest efficacy underscores the need to develop more effective therapies for non-ccRCC.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Sunitinib and everolimus are standard first-line and second-line therapies, respectively, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a randomized phase 2 trial comparing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with metastatic, non-ccRCC, or ccRCC with >20% sarcomatoid features (ccSRCC) were randomized to receive sunitinib or everolimus with crossover at disease progression. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy; 108 patients were needed to show improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 12 wk with sunitinib to 20 wk with everolimus. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Interim analysis of 68 patients (papillary [27], chromophobe [12], unclassified [10], translocation [7], ccSRCC [12]) prompted early trial closure. The mPFS in first-line therapy was 6.1 mo with sunitinib and 4.1 mo with everolimus (p=0.6); median overall survival (mOS) was not reached with sunitinib and was 10.5 mo with everolimus, respectively (p=0.014). At final analysis, mOS was 16.2 and 14.9 mo with sunitinib and everolimus, respectively (p=0.18). There were four partial responses (PRs) in first-line therapy (sunitinib: 3 of 33 [9%]; everolimus, 1 of 35 [2.8%]) and four PRs in second-line therapy (sunitinib: 2 of 21 [9.5%]; everolimus, 2 of 23 [8.6%]), with mPFS of 1.8 mo and 2.8 mo, respectively. In patients without sarcomatoid features in their tumors (n=49), mOS was 31.6 mo with sunitinib and 10.5 mo with everolimus (p=0.075). Genomic profiling of a chromophobe RCC from a patient with a PR to first-line everolimus revealed a somatic TSC2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, everolimus was not superior to sunitinib. Both agents demonstrated modest efficacy, underscoring the need for better therapies in non-ccRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This randomized phase 2 trial provides the first head-to-head comparison of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). The observed very modest efficacy underscores the need to develop more effective therapies for non-ccRCC.
Authors: Nizar M Tannir; Elizabeth Plimack; Chaan Ng; Pheroze Tamboli; Nebiyou B Bekele; Lianchun Xiao; Lisa Smith; Zita Lim; Lance Pagliaro; John Araujo; Ana Aparicio; Surena Matin; Christopher G Wood; Eric Jonasch Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Caleb F Davis; Christopher J Ricketts; Min Wang; Lixing Yang; Andrew D Cherniack; Hui Shen; Christian Buhay; Hyojin Kang; Sang Cheol Kim; Catherine C Fahey; Kathryn E Hacker; Gyan Bhanot; Dmitry A Gordenin; Andy Chu; Preethi H Gunaratne; Michael Biehl; Sahil Seth; Benny A Kaipparettu; Christopher A Bristow; Lawrence A Donehower; Eric M Wallen; Angela B Smith; Satish K Tickoo; Pheroze Tamboli; Victor Reuter; Laura S Schmidt; James J Hsieh; Toni K Choueiri; A Ari Hakimi; Lynda Chin; Matthew Meyerson; Raju Kucherlapati; Woong-Yang Park; A Gordon Robertson; Peter W Laird; Elizabeth P Henske; David J Kwiatkowski; Peter J Park; Margaret Morgan; Brian Shuch; Donna Muzny; David A Wheeler; W Marston Linehan; Richard A Gibbs; W Kimryn Rathmell; Chad J Creighton Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Viktor Grünwald; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Sevil E Bavbek; Kurt Miller; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Se-Hoon Lee; James Larkin; Petri Bono; Sun Young Rha; Daniel Castellano; Christian U Blank; Jennifer J Knox; Robert Hawkins; Oezlem Anak; Marianne Rosamilia; Jocelyn Booth; Nicoletta Pirotta; István Bodrogi Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Christos E Kyriakopoulos; Namita Chittoria; Toni K Choueiri; Nils Kroeger; Jae-Lyun Lee; Sandy Srinivas; Jennifer J Knox; Georg A Bjarnason; Scott D Ernst; Lori A Wood; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Neeraj Agarwal; Sumanta K Pal; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Sun-Young Rha; Takeshi Yuasa; Frede Donskov; Scott A North; Daniel Y Heng; Brian I Rini Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Nikhil Wagle; Brian C Grabiner; Eliezer M Van Allen; Ali Amin-Mansour; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Mara Rosenberg; Nathanael Gray; Justine A Barletta; Yanan Guo; Scott J Swanson; Daniel T Ruan; Glenn J Hanna; Robert I Haddad; Gad Getz; David J Kwiatkowski; Scott L Carter; David M Sabatini; Pasi A Jänne; Levi A Garraway; Jochen H Lorch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ana M Molina; Darren R Feldman; Michelle S Ginsberg; Glenn Kroog; Satish K Tickoo; Xiaoyu Jia; Murielle Georges; Sujata Patil; Michael S Baum; Victor E Reuter; Robert J Motzer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Janice P Dutcher; Paul de Souza; David McDermott; Robert A Figlin; Anna Berkenblit; Alexandra Thiele; Mizue Krygowski; Andrew Strahs; Jay Feingold; Gary Hudes Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Jennifer Bacik; Lawrence H Schwartz; Victor Reuter; Paul Russo; Stephanie Marion; Madhu Mazumdar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew J Armstrong; Susan Halabi; Tim Eisen; Samuel Broderick; Walter M Stadler; Robert J Jones; Jorge A Garcia; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Joel Picus; Robert E Hawkins; John D Hainsworth; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Theodore F Logan; Igor Puzanov; Lisa M Pickering; Christopher W Ryan; Andrew Protheroe; Christine M Lusk; Sadie Oberg; Daniel J George Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Toni K Choueiri; Michael B Atkins; Ziad Bakouny; Maria I Carlo; Charles G Drake; Eric Jonasch; Payal Kapur; Bryan Lewis; W Marston Linehan; Michael J Mitchell; Sumanta K Pal; Kevin Pels; Susan Poteat; W Kimryn Rathmell; Brian I Rini; Sabina Signoretti; Nizar Tannir; Robert Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Hans J Hammers Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jozefina Casuscelli; Nils Weinhold; Gunes Gundem; Lu Wang; Emily C Zabor; Esther Drill; Patricia I Wang; Gouri J Nanjangud; Almedina Redzematovic; Amrita M Nargund; Brandon J Manley; Maria E Arcila; Nicholas M Donin; John C Cheville; R Houston Thompson; Allan J Pantuck; Paul Russo; Emily H Cheng; William Lee; Satish K Tickoo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Chad J Creighton; Elli Papaemmanuil; Venkatraman E Seshan; A Ari Hakimi; James J Hsieh Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-06-15
Authors: Nur P Damayanti; Justin A Budka; Heba W Z Khella; Mary W Ferris; Sheng Yu Ku; Eric Kauffman; Anthony C Wood; Khunsha Ahmed; Venkata Nithinsai Chintala; Remi Adelaiye-Ogala; May Elbanna; Ashley Orillion; Sreenivasulu Chintala; Chinghai Kao; W Marston Linehan; George M Yousef; Peter C Hollenhorst; Roberto Pili Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vivek Narayan; Maneka Puligandla; Naomi B Haas; Pearl Subramanian; Robert S DiPaola; Robert Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Martin H Voss; Ana M Molina; Ying-Bei Chen; Kaitlin M Woo; Joshua L Chaim; Devyn T Coskey; Almedina Redzematovic; Patricia Wang; William Lee; S Duygu Selcuklu; Chung-Han Lee; Michael F Berger; Satish K Tickoo; Victor E Reuter; Sujata Patil; James J Hsieh; Robert J Motzer; Darren R Feldman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544